Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Influence of postpartum onset on the course of mood disorders

BMC Psychiatry20066:4

https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-244X-6-4

Received: 23 August 2005

Accepted: 26 January 2006

Published: 26 January 2006

Abstract

Background

To ascertain the impact of postpartum onset (PPO) on the subsequent time course of mood disorders.

Methods

This retrospective study compared per year rates of excited (manic or mixed) and depressive episodes between fifty-five women with bipolar (N = 22) or major depressive (N = 33) disorders with first episode occurring postpartum (within four weeks after childbirth according to DSM-IV definition) and 218 non-postpartum onset (NPPO) controls. Such patients had a traceable illness course consisting of one or more episodes alternating with complete symptom remission and no additional diagnoses of axis I disorders, mental retardation or brain organic diseases. A number of variables reported to influence the course of mood disorders were controlled for as possible confounding factors

Results

Bipolar women with postpartum onset disorder had fewer excited episodes (p = 0.005) and fewer episodes of both polarities (p = 0.005) compared to non-postpartum onset subjects. No differences emerged in the rates of depressive episodes. All patients who met criteria for rapid cycling bipolar disorder (7 out of 123) were in the NPPO group. Among major depressives, PPO patients experienced fewer episodes (p = 0.016). With respect to clinical and treatment features, PPO-MDD subjects had less personality disorder comorbidity (p = 0.023) and were less likely to be on maintenance treatment compared to NPPO comparison subjects (p = 0.002)

Conclusion

Such preliminary findings suggest that PPO mood disorders may be characterized by a less recurrent time course. Future research in this field should elucidate the role of comorbid personality disorders and treatment. Moreover it should clarify whether PPO disorders are also associated with a more positive outcome in terms of social functioning and quality of life.

Background

The lifetime time course of mood disorders ranges from a single episode of illness to a recurrent pattern with few or no intervals [1]. This heterogeneity would suggest abundance of course predictors. To date, however, despite considerable efforts by several research groups, only a few of them have been identified. The strongest prognostic factor is the number of previous affective episodes [2, 3]. There is mounting evidence that cycle length gets progressively shorter within the first three to five episodes, then it approaches a level corresponding to the maximum individual frequency of episodes [3]. Therefore episode number is a late predictor. On the contrary it would be desirable to influence illness process before it comes to its peak. This necessarily leads to search early predictors, most of which should be related to the first episode.

Amongst such variables polarity has probably been investigated the most: a number of studies have consistently demonstrated that bipolar disorders with manic or mixed onset are associated with a worse outcome than depressive onset forms, although such a difference seems to disappear with illness duration [46].

The role of age at onset is more controversial: some authors have indicated a worse prognosis for early onset patients [7] but others failed to confirm this finding [8] or even reported an association in the opposite direction [9]

The presence of psychotic symptoms has also been associated with a higher rate of relapse and a rapid deteriorating course [1013], along with other descriptors such as family history of psychiatric illness [14], comorbidity with anxiety or personality disorders [15] and substance abuse [16].

The aim of this study was to assess the influence of postpartum onset on mood disorder course.

Methods

Subjects

This retrospective study is based on the data of a large population of women consecutively admitted to the Center for Mood Disorders of S. Raffaele Hospital (HSR-CMD) in Milan during the period between January 1990 and January 2000. These subjects have participated in previous genetic and clinical trials undertaken by our research group [1721] and we remand to those publications for a thorough description of their recruitment. Informed consent was obtained after the procedure was explained to subjects and studies were performed after approval of the local ethical committee.

Eligible subjects were bipolar I and major depressive women aged between 15 and 44 years at illness onset who had a traceable illness course characterized by one or more affective episodes alternating with complete remission defined as a HDRS17 score <7 [22] and no symptoms of DSM-IV hypomanic, manic or mixed episodes [23]. Their minimum length of illness was 1 year calculated from the onset of the intake episode to study entry. Rapid cycling, the occurrence of ≥ 4 episodes within one year [24], was not considered among exclusion criteria. Instead additional diagnoses of mental retardation, substance-related disorders or other Axis I disorders and the presence of any organic disease impairing psychiatric evaluation were considered exclusion criteria. Moreover we excluded all patients without reliable treatment histories.

1,080 women charts were reviewed to be included in the study, of whom 125 had their first episode during the postpartum period (within 4 weeks after childbirth according to DSM IV definition) [23]. By applying the selection criteria mentioned above the study sample was reduced to 55 women with postpartum onset (PPO) mood disorders and 218 non-postpartum onset (NPPO) controls. These subjects did not significantly differ from the original population as for age, diagnostic subtype (BP vs MDD) and familiarity.

Diagnostic assessment and data collection

Lifetime diagnoses were assigned by two independent psychiatrists according to DSM-III-R and DSM-IV criteria [23, 25] on the basis of structural clinical interviews – SCID version 1.0 [26], SCID-I/P version 2.0 [27] and SCID II for personality disorders [28] – and complementary information gathered from the patients' relatives, other health professionals and, when available, medical records [29]. The treating psychiatrist proposed preliminary diagnoses of Axis I and Axis II disorders which had to be confirmed by a senior psychiatrist blind to his colleague's evaluation. If there was no agreement, a second senior psychiatrist was involved. If disagreement persisted, the case was ruled out. Actually no patient was excluded because of discordant classification.

A similar consensus procedure was employed to ascertain illness time course and treatment history. Through a method similar to the LIFE technique [30], except for a longer follow up period, the two psychiatrists produced detailed life-charts accounting for the number and characteristics of all affective episodes. These included age of onset, DSM-IV type, severity (1 to 3, according to DSM-IV classification), duration, drug used and dose, response to treatment (0 = no response, 1 = partial, 2 = complete), time of response, concomitant drugs and, for the intake episode, occurrence in the postnatal period. Treatment was coded using the Antidepressant Treatment History Form (ATHF [31]). This is a scale ranging from 1 to 4 where a score of 1 corresponds to an administration of any drug for less than 4 weeks or less than 100 mg of imipramine equivalents, a score of 2 between 100 and 199 mg of imipramine equivalents for 4 weeks or more, a score of 3 between 200 and 299 mg of imipramine equivalents for 4 weeks or more and a score of 4 more than 300 mg imipramine equivalents. We included only those subjects who scored 3 or more at the rating confidence scale (RCS) of the Antidepressant Treatment History Form (range 1–5, from no to high confidence level [31]). Among predictive variables, drug maintenance played a crucial role. A better outcome is observed with regular maintenance. However the retrospective approach hampers a complete assessment of this issue (e.g. stable compliance, blood mood stabilizer levels). Maintenance was performed with mood stabilizers at adequate doses for prophylaxis and antidepressant scoring 2–4 on the ATHF (1–4 for >60 years old patients). We scored this variable as maintenance absent (0) if maintenance was not taken or if it was taken for less than one third of the disease duration, present (2) if taken regularly for more than two thirds of the illness length, partial (1) if taken between one and two thirds and unknown if no or unreliable information (ATHF-RCS <3) was available [6].

Family psychiatric history was collected throughout a structured interview [32] and scored as follows: 0 = no first or second degree relative affected by mood disorders; 1 = one to three second degree affected relatives; 2 = one affected first degree relative or more than three second degree affected relatives; 3 = more than one affected first degree relative. All patients were evaluated on their lifetime symptomatology with the operational criteria (OPCRIT) checklist [33]. This is a 90 item scale which covers most psychotic and affective disorder symptoms. It was originally administered to identify the factor structure of major psychoses [3436], in the present paper it was used to investigate psychotic features (delusions and/or hallucinations).

Statistical analyses

Bipolar I and major depressive patients were analyzed separately. Per year rates of excited (manic + mixed) and depressive episodes were compared between PPO and NPPO mood disorders by means of Student's t test. Manic and mixed episodes were pooled together since the retrospective nature of our investigation hampered a clear distinction between these two subtypes. In particular psychotic mania could hardly be distinguished from a delusional mixed state. Confounding variables – the list included age of onset, length of illness, total number of episodes, polarity of the intake episode, family history of psychiatric disorders, psychotic features, comorbid personality disorders and treatment history – asymmetrically distributed between PPO and NPPO samples (p < 0.05) were controlled for using ANCOVA.

The power of our bipolar and MDD samples to detect differences between PPO and NPPO groups was calculated considering an alpha value of 0.01 two tailed. With these parameters in each diagnostic sample we had a high power (0.80) to detect a medium effect size (d = 0.80) that corresponded to a difference of approximately 0.3 points in the episode frequency (14% of variance explained) between the two comparison groups [37]

Results

Bipolar sample

In the bipolar sample (N = 123) the mean age at illness onset was 27.6 ± 7.3 years, at study entry it was 42.1 ± 13.5 years. Mean duration of illness was 14.5 ± 11.4 years; family history of mood disturbance were reported in 92.% of probands: 76% of them had one to three cases of affective illness among their second degree relatives, the remaining 16% had more than three cases among their second degree relatives or one affected first degree relative. Mood episodes were on average 2.59 ± 2.07 for excited and 3.37 ± 2.88 for depressive ones.

The characteristics of PPO and NPPO bipolar patients are reported in table I. Women with postpartum onset disorders significantly differed from non-postpartum controls as they were more frequently married (p = 0.002), with a lower recurrence of both excited (p = 0.005) and total affective episodes (p = 0.005). Confounding variables were all symmetrically distributed between comparison groups, so they were not controlled by performing analysis of covariance. One bipolar woman had a single episode disorder. 7 out of 123 bipolar women (5.6%) met criteria for rapid cycling disorder (see above): they were all in the NPPO group.
Table 1

Comparison between postpartum and non-postpartum bipolar patients (N = 123)

 

Postpartum (N = 22)

Non-postpartum (N = 101)

Statistical Analyses

Age (years)

44.4 ± 12.4

41.7 ± 13.7

t = 0.89

p = 0.372

Marital status (Single/Married) 1

1/21

36/60

X2 = 9.0

p = 0.002*

Education (years)

9.5 ± 3.0

10.4 ± 4.3

t = 1.16

p = 0.251

Workers for pay (Yes/No) 2

9/13

56/39

X2 = 2.3

p = 0.125

Personality disorders (Yes/No) 3

9/4

43/28

X2 = 0.3

p = 0.554

Age of onset (years)

27.2 ± 6.5

27.6 ± 7.5

t = 0.25

p = 0.800

Polarity at onset (excited/depressive)

5/17

35/66

X2 = 1.2

p = 0.279

Length of illness (years)

17.2 ± 11.2

13.9 ± 11.5

t = 1.22

p = 0.225

Familiarity (0 to 3)

1.00 ± 0.56

1.10 ± 0.85

t = 0.38

p = 0.379

Psychotic symptoms (Yes/No)

14/8

82/19

X2 = 3.2

p = 0.071

Maintenance (0 to 2)

0.95 ± 0.94

1.33 ± 0.91

t = 1.73

p = 0.086

Any polarity episodes (total number)

6.00 ± 3.6

5.96 ± 3.4

t = 0.05

p = 0.961

Any polarity episodes (number/year)

0.50 ± 0.34

0.81 ± 0.80

t = 2.85

p = 0.005*

Excited episodes (number/year)

0.21 ± 0.26

0.42 ± 0.45

t = 2.89

p = 0.005*

Depressive episodes (number/year)

0.29 ± 0.21

0.39 ± 0.51

t = 1.48

p = 0.141

*Significant p < 0.05. 1assessed in 118 patients; 2assessed in 117 patients; 3assessed in 84 patients

Major depressive sample

Unipolar women (N = 150) mean age at illness onset was 29.4 ± 7.6 years, at study entry it was 48.6 ± 13.1 years. Mean length of illness was 18.7 ± 13.2 years; family history of mood disturbance was reported in 83.% of probands: 66% of them had one to three cases of affective illness among their second degree relatives, the remaining 17% had more than three cases among their second degree relatives or one affected first degree relative. An average of 3.59 ± 3.27 mood disorder episodes were observed in the sample.

The characteristics of PPO and NPPO major depressive patients are reported in table 2. Compared to NPPO controls, PPO patients were more frequently married (p = 0.004) and had a lower prevalence of comorbid personality disorders (p = 0.023). This latter feature was assessed in 96 out of 150 patients (64%). In addition PPO patients showed lower scores on the scale of maintenance treatment (p = 0.002). With respect to illness course, PPO patients had lower recurrence rates than their NPPO counterpart (p = 0.016). This finding was no longer significant after controlling for maintenance (ANCOVA: F = 1.31 p = 0.25).
Table 2

Comparison between postpartum and non-postpartum major depressive patients (N = 150)

 

Postpartum (N = 33)

Non-postpartum (N = 117)

Statistical Analyses

Age (years)

50.8 ± 13.0

48.0 ± 13.1

t = 0.58

p = 0.565

Marital status (Single/Married) 1

0/33

24/89

X2 = 8.4

p = 0.004*

Education (years)

8.6 ± 3.6

9.9 ± 4.2

t = 1.57

p = 0.119

Workers for pay (Yes/No) 2

13/20

57/55

X2 = 1.3

p = 0.245

Personality disorders (Yes/No) 3

7/15

44/30

X2 = 5.2

p = 0.023*

Age of onset (years)

30.1 ± 6.6

29.9 ± 7.9

t = 0.14

p = 0.887

Length of illness (years)

20.7 ± 11.9

18.1 ± 13.5

t = 1.02

p = 0.308

Familiarity (0 to 3)

1.03 ± 0.5

1.00 ± 0.6

t = 0.27

p = 0.786

Psychotic symptoms (Yes/No)

11/22

34/83

X2 = 0.3

p = 0.562

Maintenance (0 to 2)

0.36 ± 0.7

0.85 ± 0.9

t = 3.15

p = 0.002*

Depressive episodes (total number)

3.06 ± 2.4

3.74 ± 3.5

t = 1.06

p = 0.291

Depressive episodes (number/year)

0.26 ± 0.3

0.41 ± 0.4

t = 2.45

p = 0.016*

*Significant p < 0.05. 1assessed in 146 patients; 2assessed in 145 patients; 3assessed in 96 patients

27 major depressive women were diagnosed with single episode disorder, 7 in the PPO (21%) and 20 in the NPPO (17%) group (p = 0.59) Their mean length of illness was 12.7 ± 13.7 years compared to 17.3 ± 12.4 years of subjects with recurrent episodes (p = 0.07). No major depressive woman met criteria for rapid cycling disorder.

Discussion

This study addressed the topic of predicting the course of mood disorders at early stages. For researchers, specific time course predictors might help in identifying endophenotypes for biological and genetic investigations [38]. For clinicians, the early recognition of disorders with a relatively good prognosis would warrant less intensive treatment and, as such, a minor burden of side effects.

Among possible early course predictors we focused on postpartum onset because:

1) pregnancy and the postpartum period are distinct neurobiological states with regard to brain function and the incidence of psychiatric disorders is different during these periods [39, 40];

2) to know how the disease may evolve is even more important for a mother who has to take care of her child in the early "critical" years of life.

Therefore we retrospectively evaluated illness course in mood disorders with and without postpartum onset. Since bipolar disorders have repeatedly been associated with a poorer prognosis [3, 41], bipolar and major depressed patients were analyzed separately.

Bipolar sample

The most striking result was the lower recurrence of total affective episodes and excited (manic/mixed) episodes in PPO bipolar I disorder. In addition all bipolar women with a rapid cycling disorder (7 out of 133) did not have their intake episode during the postpartum period. Altogether these findings suggest that in bipolar I disorder postpartum onset may predict a time course characterized by a lower recurrence. Whether this implies a better outcome in terms of social functioning and quality of life was an issue not addressed in the present study. We only found that PPO bipolars were more frequently married compared to NPPO comparison patients, while the two groups were similar in education level and employment status. Future research in this field should incorporate the assessment of social adjustment and quality of life. On the contrary, excited depressive episodes had a similar recurrence rate in PPO and NPPO bipolar disorders. A possible explanation for this fact is based on recent evidence that postpartum relapse in bipolar women is usually depressive [42]. Another possible explanation is that in our PPO group some bipolars might have an overall higher threshold for relapse with the majority of episodes occurring only in the postpartum period: such individuals are expected to have fewer episodes during illness course, almost exclusively depressive and in the postpartum period. This would lead to a slight decrease in the rates of depressive episodes but a significant decrease in manic episodes. Such a hypothesis could not be verified here as we had no information on postpartum episodes other than the first one. Another explanation is that our findings could be artefacts due to an asymmetric distribution of established course predictors. Of such variables, anxiety disorders [43, 44], alcohol/substance abuse [4547] and inter-episode residual symptoms [4850] were exclusion criteria. Other confounding factors such as personality disorders [15, 51] and clinical features including age [52] and polarity at onset [4, 5, 53], psychotic manifestations [10, 11], length of illness and number of episodes prior to study entry [2, 3, 54] were similarly distributed between PPO and NPPO samples. Drug maintenance was a crucial issue in this study, although its effect is not clear. Lithium prophylaxis in bipolar patients produces a significant reduction of the mean number of episodes [55, 56]. Unfortunately, even with sustained lithium prophylaxis, the likelihood of at least one recurrence exceeded 70% within 5 years of recovery [57]. Moreover some have suggested that antidepressant drugs may increase the recurrence rate in bipolars [58, 59]. In our bipolar sample drug maintenance could not bias results as it did not significantly differ between PPO and NPPO subjects. However there was no available information on patients' compliance (e.g plasma levels of antidepressants [60] and mood stabilizers [61]).

Depressive sample

Patients with PPO major depressive disorder experienced fewer episodes during illness course compared to the NPPO sample. The latter subjects were more likely to be on maintenance treatment which could have lowered their "natural" relapse rate. This strengthen the hypothesis that PPO depressive disorder has a better course. However the control for maintenance treatment greatly reduced the difference between PPO and NPPO patients. It is a paradoxical finding whose most likely implication is the lack of a protective effect of maintenance therapy in our MDD sample. It should be noted that PPO unipolar women were also associated with a lower prevalence of personality disorders. This may (at least partially) explain why they were less likely to relapse given the known negative impact of axis II comorbidity on the outcome of mood disorders [51]. The retrospective design of the study could bias data collection toward a decreased detection of past episodes and unreliable estimates of clinical variables. In particular we found a very low prevalence of rapid cycling. To control this bias we used a set of strategies: clinical information was obtained by interviewing patients, their relatives and previous health professionals and, whenever possible, by examining records [29]; a blind experienced psychiatrist reviewed charts; unreliability was assessed and considered as exclusion criterion. Another caveat is related to the atypical features of our sample collected in a tertiary care setting. These are illustrated by the high percentage of bipolar disorders, the high rate of positive family history and the fact that this value was not different between BPD and MDD patients. Such flaws limit the generalizability of our results and emphasize the need for further prospective studies.

Conclusion

Our preliminary data suggest that postpartum onset may be associated with a less severe time course of mood disorders. The present study design does not allow to suggest postpartum affective disorder as a stand alone diagnostic category. In fact an onset of the disease during the postpartum period is not a good criterion to exclude "pseudopostpartum" patients, that is bipolar and major depressive patients with episodes fortuitously occurring during postpartum. Furthermore not all women in our control group were parous, a prerequisite to understand their susceptibility to postpartum recurrence.

Declarations

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Psychiatry, Vita-Salute University, San Raffaele Institute

References

  1. Goodwin F, Jamison K: Manic-depressive illness. 1990, New York, Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
  2. Kessing LV, Andersen PK, Mortensen PB: Predictors of recurrence in affective disorder. A case register study. Journal of Affective Disorders. 1998, 49: 101-108.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Kessing LV, Andersen PK, Mortensen PB, Bolwig TG: Recurrence in affective disorder. I. Case register study. British Journal of Psychiatry. 1998, 172: 23-28.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Keller MB: The course of manic-depressive illness. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry. 1988, 49: 4-7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Tohen M, Waternaux CM, Tsuang MT: Outcome in Mania. A 4-year prospective follow-up of 75 patients utilizing survival analysis. Archives of General Psychiatry. 1990, 47: 1106-1111.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Cusin C, Serretti A, Lattuada E, Mandelli L, Smeraldi E: Impact of clinical variables on illness time course in mood disorders. Psychiatry Research. 2000, 97: 217-227.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Giles DE, Jarrett RB, Biggs MM, Guzick DS, Rush AJ: Clinical predictors of recurrence in depression. American Journal of Psychiatry. 1989, 146: 764-767.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Keitner GI, Ryan CE, Miller IW, Zlotnick C: Psychosocial factors and the long-term course of major depression. Journal of Affective Disorders. 1997, 44: 57-67.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Winokur G, Kadrmas A: A polyepisodic course in bipolar illness: possible clinical relationships. Comprehensive Psychiatry. 1989, 30: 121-127.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Coryell W, Leon A, Winokur G, Endicott J, Keller M, Akiskal HS, Solomon D: Importance of psychotic features to long-term course in major depressive disorder. American Journal of Psychiatry. 1996, 153: 483-489.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Thakur M, Hays J, Krishnan KRR: Clinical, demographic and social characteristics of psychotic depression. Psychiatry Research. 1999, 86: 99-106.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Kessing LV: Subtypes of depressive episodes according to ICD-10. Prediction of risk of relapse and suicide. Psychopathology. 2003, 36: 285-291.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Kessing LV: Subtypes of manic episodes according to ICD-10. Prediction of time to remission and risk of relapse. J Affect Disord. 2004, 279-285.Google Scholar
  14. Neuman RJ, Geller B, Rice JP, Todd RD: Increased prevalence and earlier onset of mood disorders among relatives of prepubertal versus adult probands. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry. 1997, 36: 466-473.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Black DW, Bell S, Hulbert J, Nasrallah A: The importance of Axis II in patients with major depression. A controlled study. Journal of Affective Disorders. 1988, 14: 115-122.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Mueller TI, Lavori PW, Keller MB, Swartz A, Warshaw M, Hasin D, Coryell W, Endicott J, Rice J, Akiskal H: Prognostic effect of the variable course of alcoholism on the 10-year course of depression. American Journal of Psychiatry. 1994, 151: 701-706.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Lattuada E, Serretti A, Cusin C, Gasperini M, Macciardi F, Smeraldi E: Symptomatologic analysis of psychotic and non-psychotic depression. Journal of Affective Disorders. 1999, 54: 183-187.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Serretti A, Rietschel M, Lattuada E, Krauss H, Held T, Nothen M, Smeraldi E: Factor analysis of Mania. Archives of General Psychiatry. 1999, 56: 671-672.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Serretti A, Lattuada E, Smeraldi E: Outcome of affective psychosis. Depression and Anxiety. 1999, 10: 50-54.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Serretti A, Lattuada E, Cusin C, Macciardi F, Smeraldi E: Analysis of depressive symptomatology in mood disorders. Depression and Anxiety. 1998, 8: 80-85.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Serretti A, Lilli R, Lorenzi C, Lattuada E, Smeraldi E: DRD4 exon 3 variants associated with delusional symptomatology in major psychoses: A study on 2,011 affected subjects. Am J Med Genet. 2001, 105: 283-290.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Nierenberg AA, DeCecco LM: Definitions of antidepressant treatment response, remission, nonresponse, partial response, and other relevant outcomes: a focus on treatment-resistant depression. J Clin Psychiatry. 2001, 62 Suppl 16: 5-9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. American Psychiatric Association: Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th Edition. 1994, Washington DC, American Psychiatric AssociationGoogle Scholar
  24. Ananth J, Wohl M, Ranganath V, Beshay M: Rapid cycling patients: conceptual and etiological factors. Neuropsychobiology. 1993, 27: 193-198.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. American Psychiatric Association: Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 3rd Edition revised. 1987, Washington DC, American Psychiatric AssociationGoogle Scholar
  26. Spitzer RL, Williams JBW, Gibbon M, First MB: Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-III-R, Version 1.0 (SCID). 1990, Washington, DC, American Psychiatric PressGoogle Scholar
  27. First MB, Spitzer RL, Gibbon M, Williams JB: Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis I Disorders - Patient Edition (SCID - I/P, Version 2.0). 1995, , New York: Biometrics Research Department, New York State Psychiatric InstituteGoogle Scholar
  28. First MB, Spitzer RL, Gibbon M, Williams BW, Benjamin L: Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis II Personality Disorders (SCID-II). 1990, , New York: Biometrics Research Department, New York State Psychiatric InstituteGoogle Scholar
  29. Leckman JF, Sholomskas D, Thompson WD, Belanger A, Weissman MM: Best estimate of lifetime psychiatric diagnosis: a methodological study. Archives of General Psychiatry. 1982, 39: 879-883.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Keller MB, Lavori PW, Friedman B, Nielsen E, Endicott J, McDonald-Scott P, Andreasen NC: The Longitudinal Interval Follow-up Evaluation. A comprehensive method for assessing outcome in prospective longitudinal studies. Archives of General Psychiatry. 1987, 44: 540-548.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Shapira B, Lidsky D, Gorfine M, Lerer B: Electroconvulsive therapy and resistant depression: Clinical implications of seizure threshold. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry. 1996, 57: 32-38.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Andreasen NC, Endicott J, Spitzer RL, Winokur G: The family history method using diagnostic criteria: reliability and validity. Archives of General Psychiatry. 1977, 34: 1229-1233.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. McGuffin P, Farmer A, Harvey I: A polydiagnostic application of operational criteria in studies of psychotic illness. Development and reliability of the OPCRIT system. Archives of General Psychiatry. 1991, 48: 764-770.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Serretti A, Rietschel M, Lattuada E, Krauss H, Schulze T, Müller D, Maier W, Smeraldi E: Major psychoses symptomatology: factor analysis of 2241 psychotic subjects. European Archives of Psychiatry & Clinical Neuroscience. 2001, 251: 193-198.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Serretti A, Olgiati P: Dimensions of major psychoses: a confirmatory factor analysis of six competing models. Psychiatry Research. 2004, 127: 101-109.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Serretti A, Olgiati P: Profiles of "manic" symptoms in bipolar I, bipolar II and major depressive disorders. Journal of Affective Disorders. 2005, 84: 159-166.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Cohen J: Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. 1988, Hillsdale, New Jersey, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 8-14.Google Scholar
  38. Merikangas KR, Wicki W, Angst J: Heterogeneity of depression. Classification of depressive subtypes by longitudinal course. British Journal of Psychiatry. 1994, 164: 342-348.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. O'Hara MW, Schlechte JA, Lewis DA: Prospective study of postpartum blues. Biologic and psychosocial factors. Archives of General Psychiatry. 1991, 48: 801-806.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Brockington IF, Chernik KF, Schofield EM: Puerperal psychosis. Archives of General Psychiatry. 1981, 38: 829-833.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Angst J, Preisig M: Course of a clinical cohort of unipolar, bipolar and schizoaffective patients. Results of a prospective study from 1959 to 1985. Schweiz Arch Neurol Psychiatr. 1995, 146: 5-16.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Freeman MP, Smith KW, Freeman SA, McElroy SL, Kmetz GE, Wright R, Keck PEJ: The impact of reproductive events on the course of bipolar disorder in women. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry. 2002, 284-287.Google Scholar
  43. Gorman JM, Coplan JD: Comorbidity of depression and panic disorder. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry. 1996, 57: 34-41; discussion 42-3.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Perugi G, Toni C, Frare F, Travierso MC, Hantouche E, Akiskal HS: Obsessive-compulsivebipolar comorbidity: a systematic exploration of clinical features and treatment outcome. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry. 2002, 63: 1129-1134.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Brady KT, Sonne SC: The relationship between substance abuse and bipolar disorder. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry. 1995, 56: 19-24.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Hasin DS, Tsai WY, Endicott J, Mueller TI, Coryell W, Keller M: Five-year course of major depression: effects of comorbid alcoholism. Journal of Affective Disorders. 1996, 41: 63-70.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Levin FR, Hennessy G: Bipolar disorder and substance abuse. Biol Psychiatry. 2004, 56: 738-748.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Steffens DC, McQuoid DR, Krishnan KR: Partial response as a predictor of outcome in geriatric depression. . American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry. 2003, 11: 340-348.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Benazzi F: Inter-episode mood lability in mood disorders: residual symptom or natural course of illness?. Psychiatry and clinical neuroscience. 2004, 58: 480-486.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  50. McIntyre RS, O'Donovan C: The human cost of not achieving full remission in depression. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry. 2004, 49: 10-16.Google Scholar
  51. Alnaes R, Torgersen S: Personality and personality disorders predict development and relapses of major depression. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica. 1997, 95: 336-342.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Ernst CL, Goldberg JF: Clinical features related to age at onset in bipolar disorder. Journal of Affective Disorders. 2004, 82: 21-27.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Perugi G, Micheli C, Akiskal HS, Madaro D, Socci C, Quilici C, Musetti L: Polarity of the first episode, clinical characteristics, and course of manic depressive illness: a systematic retrospective investigation of 320 bipolar I patients. Compr Psychiatry. 2000, 41: 13-18.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Coryell W, Endicott J, Maser JD, Mueller T, Lavori P, Keller M: The likelihood of recurrence in bipolar affective disorder: the importance of episode recency. Journal of Affective Disorders. 1995, 33: 201-206.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Maj M: Long-term impact of lithium prophylaxis on the course of bipolar disorder. Issues in Preventive Psychiatry. Edited by: Christodoulou G, Lecic-Tosevski D and Kontaxakis VP. 1999, Basel, Karger, 79-82.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  56. Maj M: The impact of lithium prophylaxis on the course of bipolar disorder: a review of the research evidence. Bipolar Disorders. 2000, 2: 93-101.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Coryell W, Winokur G, Solomon D, Shea T, Leon A, Keller M: Lithium and recurrence in a long-term follow-up of bipolar affective disorder. Psychological Medicine. 1997, 27: 281-287.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Altshuler LL, Post RM, Leverich GS, Mikalauskas K, Rosoff A, Ackerman L: Antidepressant-induced mania and cycle acceleration: a controversy revisited. Am J Psychiatry. 1995, 152: 1130-1138.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Wehr TA, Goodwin FK: Can antidepressants cause mania and worsen the course of affective illness?. American Journal of Psychiatry. 1987, 144: 1403-1411.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Melfi CA, Chawla AJ, Croghan TW, Hanna MP, Kennedy S, Sredl K: The effects of adherence to antidepressant treatment guidelines on relapse and recurrence of depression. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1998, 55: 1128-1132.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Fawcett J, Kravitz HM: The long-term management of bipolar disorders with lithium, carbamazepine, and antidepressants. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry. 1985, 46: 58-60.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Pre-publication history

    1. The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-244X/6/4/prepub

Copyright

© Serretti et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2006

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement