Skip to main content

The social support, mental health, psychiatric symptoms, and functioning of persons with schizophrenia participating in peer co-delivered vocational rehabilitation: a pilot study in Taiwan



Vocational peer support (VPS) services are recovery-oriented interventions in modern psychiatric care for persons with schizophrenia. However, few VPS services are found in Taiwan. Hence, a pilot program of peer co-delivered vocational rehabilitation to support persons with schizophrenia in Taiwan was proposed and evaluated.


Six peers were trained and were willing to co-lead and assist workplace problem-solving groups and care skills training in an extended vocational rehabilitation program from August 2017 to December 2018. The social support, mental health, psychiatric symptoms, and functioning of service users were assessed before and after peer co-delivered services, and the assessments were based on the following: Social Support Scale (SSS), Chinese Health Questionnaire-12 (CHQ-12), Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS), Global Assessment of Function (GAF), and the Chinese version of the Social Functioning Scale (C-SFS).


The recruited 46 service users were mostly middle-aged (49.1 ± 9.8), with 27 being male (58.7%). After interventions, 42 service users who completed the program had a significantly increased SSS score (149.1 ± 31.8 vs. 161.2 ± 35.0, df = 41, t = 2.70, p = 0.01) and subscale of friend-peer dimension (44.4 ± 12.0 vs. 53.2 ± 13.2, df = 41, t = 4.72, p < 0.001). The objective (GAF: 69.8 ± 9.8 vs. 72.6 ± 8.8, df = 41, t = 3.50, p = 0.001) and subjective social functional scores (C-SFS: 75.2 ± 8.8 vs. 78.1 ± 9.5, df = 41, t = 2.59, p = 0.01) both significantly increased. The weekly wage elevated significantly (37.5 ± 35.5 vs. 43.6 ± 38.0, df = 41, t = 2.57, p = 0.01) and the BPRS-18 score decreased significantly, too (31.2 ± 6.7 vs. 29.3 ± 5.0, df = 41, t = − 2.83, p = 0.007).


Peer co-delivered vocational rehabilitation services may enhance the social support received by persons with schizophrenia and improve their occupational outcomes. The pilot program proposed can thus be a model for non-Western countries with limited resources allocated by governments to support persons with schizophrenia. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials NCT04767204, retrospectively registered on Feb 23, 2021.

Peer Review reports


Persons with schizophrenia may see their social and/or occupational functions deteriorate during the course of their illness [1, 2], due to the psychotic, affective, and/or cognitive symptoms triggered by the illness [2, 3]. These individuals also tend to be ill-equipped to make necessary adjustments when facing discrimination in living environments, because of low self-efficacy and internalized stigma [4, 5].

To overcome these challenges, recovery-oriented services have been integrated into mental health care systems for decades to support persons with schizophrenia [6]. Peer-delivered intervention is one such service that has emerged in the past 20 years. Unlike trained professionals, peer support workers who also live with schizophrenia can share lived experiences and make decisions together with service users [7]. Hence, self-determination and self-efficacy are emphasized in peer support services to help service users overcome internalized stigma and the sense of powerlessness [4, 6, 8]. Empirical evidence also shows that peer support services can be effective in instilling hope and overcoming the aforementioned difficulties, and can help persons who experience severe mental illness to engage more actively in their journey of recovery [9, 10]. Delivered as part of the case management service, peer support services can also reduce hospitalization rates and psychiatric symptoms [9, 11].

Given the proven effectiveness of supported employment [12, 13], peer support services have also been integrated into vocational rehabilitation systems for persons who experience severe mental illness [14, 15]. During job matching, peer support services delivered as part of supported employment offer individualized assistance, and the preferences of persons with disabilities are always respected [12, 13]. Peer support workers draw from their own lived experiences to help persons who experience severe mental illness overcome internalized stigma and low self-esteem and/or self-efficacy at work [4, 13]. Peer support workers also serve as role models for persons with disabilities, by exemplifying the positive outcomes that are achievable if persons with disabilities tap into their own preferences, potential, and advantages for employment through self-determination [14, 16]. An earlier study found that peer support worker’s “lived experience” motivated persons with disabilities to engage in relationship-building and instilled in them a sense of normalcy, both of which facilitated the forming of mutual support and the pursuit of vocational goals by persons who experience severe mental illness [14].

In Taiwan, mental health services are primarily provided through hospital-based treatment but they have shifted to community care gradually in recent decades. In 2017, a total of 23,404 beds for psychiatric treatment in hospitals were provided for the general population in Taiwan, with a ratio of 99.4/100,000 persons [17]. This coverage ratio is higher than those in countries where community care for persons with severe mental illness is emphasized (UK: 23.9/100,000, USA: 29.8/100,000 and AUS: 29.0/100,000 between 2015 and 2017) [18]. In contrast to hospital treatment, in 2017, there were 67 community rehabilitation centers and 144 halfway houses in local communities, with ratios of 13.5/100,000 and 25.8/100,000 persons in Taiwan, respectively [17]. Sheltered or supported employment in Taiwan is still primarily delivered by trained professionals or paraprofessionals in community facilities for persons with severe mental illness. Although trained peers can deliver vocational support based on recovery concepts at least as well as professionals in supported employment services [14,15,16], the large absence of peer support workers is rooted in the lack of insurance coverage and limited government budgets in Taiwan. Accordingly, further investigations are warranted to evaluate the effectiveness of peer support services in vocational rehabilitation among persons with severe mental illness under the development of peer-deliver services in Taiwan.

Therefore, we designed a 2-phase pilot program: Phase I includes the training of peers to become service providers of peer support services through the completion of a curriculum designed by the professionals in community rehabilitation center, and phase II includes the measurement of effectiveness among service users under peer co-delivered services (Table 1). The investigated effectiveness among persons with schizophrenia in this study included the received social support, mental health, psychiatric symptoms, and functional and occupational outcomes.

Table 1 Study phases: training & service content, participants, and stakeholders



The pilot program was held from April 2017 to December 2018 at the Taipei Veterans General Hospital Yuli Branch (TVGH-YL). The hospital provides treatment and community care for patients with mental illness who reside in the rural area of eastern Taiwan. The TVGH-YL administers a half-way house, a community rehabilitation center, and a supported housing program. The hospital also provides sheltered and supported employment as part of its community care services for persons with mental illness [19]. In the month before the Phase I program (Table 1), we invited participants with schizophrenia who had cared for elderly persons, such as provided meal-delivery, housekeeping or care attendant services under the supported or sheltered employment, to join the training curriculum in the Phase I program, because these persons were peer support worker candidates who could share their work experiences from the Phase II program. The invitation to Phase I was given by the principal investigator through individual interviews and based on the list of recommendations by the staff in the community rehabilitation center. In Phase II (Table 1), we recruited the participants by posting posters on bulletin boards in the half-way house and community rehabilitation center 1 month before initiation.

The inclusion criteria for both phases of the program were: (i) Having disability certification with diagnoses of schizophrenia in the social welfare system, or catastrophic illness of schizophrenia in the health insurance system; (ii) living in half-way houses or receiving services from the supported housing program; (iii) participating in a sheltered or supported employment program; and (iv) showing interest in the job of care attendant. The exclusion criteria were: (i) Comorbidity of severe physical illnesses which could lead to hospitalization; (ii) acute exacerbation of psychosis; and (iii) a reading ability below the age of 6 years. For Phase I, there was one additional inclusion criterion which required experience of caring for elderly persons in the community for at least 1 year.

Pilot program

Training for peer support workers

Initially, there were seven professionals who had at least 5 years of experience in community facilities discussing the framework and content of the training curriculum for peer support workers in the focus groups (Table 1). These seven professionals who are specialized in 6 medical disciplines were also the teachers in the curriculum. Table 2 details the themes of the curriculum with the principles of recovery and operations of peer support. The various intervention levels oriented the teacher to emphasize the range of social connections in the provided services (Table 2). The trainees participated in the curriculum which includes 1–2 classes per week on average, lasting for a total of 16 weeks. Each trainee can be helped by his or her tutor, who is also one of the teachers in the curriculum. At the end of each lecture session, four questions were proposed by the teacher to examine the trainees with respect to the core concepts of the class. In the practice session, the performance of trainees was examined through case discussions, role playing, or simulated situations. There was no final examination in the Phase I program. However, the trainee was required to pass all classes with the assent of the teachers. If the trainee needed to improve their knowledge or skills, he or she was allotted personal time with the teacher to receive more help. Each trainee could only miss two classes and he or she would need extracurricular learning, taught by the tutor.

Table 2 Levels of intervention and themes of curriculum for peer support worker training

The extended vocational rehabilitation services co-led & assisted by peer support workers

The Phase II program was held twice, in August of 2017 and June of 2018 (Table 1). Based on the needs of elderly persons with disabilities or dementia in local communities, the 2 occupational therapists organized the extended work training course, which focused on improving the care skills of Phase II program participants (service users). The 2 occupational therapists also held workplace problem-solving groups once every 2 weeks for service users. The above interventions were originally part of supported employment services in the community rehabilitation center, but the participation rate was previously unsatisfactory. Therefore, we integrated the peer support service into this service system. Before each training session, peer support workers discussed with 2 occupational therapists (“stakeholders”) to decide on the content and process of the session. Peer support workers’ involvement should account for at least 50% of the session time to ensure the intensity of support. The supervisor (KYC) had weekly discussions with the occupational therapist and monthly discussions with the peer support worker based on feedback from satisfaction questionnaires for service users and the group records. Four instances of observation by the supervision were also arranged to audit the performance of the occupational therapist and peer support workers in all the sessions of the Phase II program. More specifics on this phase of the program can be found in Table 1.


Social support

We used the Social Support Scale (SSS)—initially designed by Liu and later modified by Sung and Yeh [20]—to measure the social support received by service users. The Kaiser–Meyer–Olkin (KMO) value of 0.82 and the Bartlett test of sphericity (BT) of 815.37 (P < 0.001) in factor analysis confirm the construct validity of the scale. Internal consistency is also confirmed by the Cronbach’s α of 0.86 [18]. Three dimensions of social support were measured: relatives or family (SSS-R), staff or professionals (SSS-S), and friends or peers (SSS-F).

Mental health and psychiatric symptoms

The Chinese Health Questionnaire-12 (CHQ-12) was employed to measure the mental health of service users. The value of the area under the Relative Operating Characteristic curve is 0.85, and the cutoff value is 3/4 [21]. The sensitivity of the questionnaire is 78%, and the specificity, 77% [20]. The lower the score, the better the mental health.

We also measured the psychiatric symptoms of the service users by using the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale-18 (BPRS-18). According to Bell et al., the α values, which measure internal consistency for positive, negative, and general symptoms in the BPRS, are 0.69, 0.68, and 0.46, respectively, which are deemed satisfactory to acceptable [22]. The interrater reliability (r = 0.87) is also deemed satisfactory [22].

Social function

We measured the social functions of service users objectively by using the Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF) and subjectively by using the Chinese version of the Social Functioning Scale (C-SFS). Jones et al. reported a reliability coefficient of 0.72 and a significant negative association between the GAF score and patients’ medication/support needs [23].

The Chinese version of the Social Functioning Scale (C-SFS) was adapted by Song [24] from the Social Functioning Scale (SFS) developed by Birchwood et al., by factoring in distinct cultural characteristics in Taiwan. The internal consistencies are deemed acceptable to good, with a Cronbach’s α value of 0.86 for the scale as a whole and Cronbach’s α values ranging from 0.48 to 0.88 for the subscales [24]. The higher the score, the better the social function.

Earned income from employment

The weekly wages of service users from sheltered or supported employment were collected from users’ records on file for the 3 months before and after the intervention of vocational rehabilitation. The average weekly income and working hours during the 3 months were used as the measure of occupational outcome.

Process of assessment

The pre- and post-intervention self-report questionnaires were completed with assistance from the occupational therapist (MPK). The BPRS-18 and GAF scales were measured by a board psychiatrist (KYC) who had experience in the multiple-center clinical trial. The assistant and investigator both belonged to the intervention group, because there was no control group or blind procedure in the study design.

Statistical methods

As all indicators examined in this study were continuous variables, we used the paired t-test to compare the measurements before and after the intervention. IBM SPSS Statistics 16.0 was employed for statistical analysis.


Characteristics of service users

Among the 187 persons with severe mental illness under community care in the study site, 8 peers were trained to be peer support workers during phase I of the program. All the 8 peers passed the training curriculum (Table 2). However, only six persons were willing to provide the services.

Respectively, 24 and 22 service users participated in the Phase II program in the first and second year. Table 3 presents the characteristics of users of the peer-supported vocational rehabilitation services. Most of them are middle-aged, and approximately three-fifths are male. Most are single and have received formal education for more than 9 years. Nearly three-fourths live in halfway houses, while the rest joined the supported housing program. The most common social welfare support which service users have received is disability welfare, followed by exemption from the copayment of health insurance, and low-income subsidy, in that order (Table 3). Roughly two-thirds of service users participated in the sheltered employment program, and the rest joined the supported employment program. The main types of jobs of the service users are cleaner (n = 11, 23.9%) and manpower dispatch (n = 9, 19.6%) (Table 3). Most service users experienced the onset of mental illness during young adulthood and have a long history of hospitalization. About two-fifths have a history of suicide attempts or violent behavior.

Table 3 Characteristics of service users receiving vocational peer support services

Out of the 46 users who signed up for the vocational rehabilitation support, 4 later withdrew. One experienced acute exacerbation of psychosis and also exhibited the most severe psychiatric symptoms (BPRS-18 = 45) among all service users and poorest self-reported mental health (CHQ = 6) when enrolling in the program. One user gained knowledge and skills caring for her disabled elderly mother at home. The other two failed to reach the attendance rate threshold of 80% (Table 1).

Pre- vs. post-intervention of peer co-delivered services

As shown in Table 4, despite scoring the lowest before intervention, the social support from friends or peers (SSS-F) is the only dimension that scores significantly higher after the intervention (44.4 ± 12.0 vs. 53.2 ± 13.2, df = 41, t = 4.72, p < 0.001), and contributes directly to the higher post-intervention score of social support as a whole (149.1 ± 31.8 vs. 161.2 ± 35.0, df = 41, t = 2.70, p = 0.01). The post-intervention score of psychiatric symptoms (BPRS-18) is significantly lower than the pre-intervention score (31.2 ± 6.7 vs. 29.3 ± 5.0, df = 41, t = − 2.83, p = 0.007), although the scores of mental health (CHQ-12) do not vary significantly before and after the intervention (3.1 ± 2.6 vs. 2.8 ± 2.5, df = 41, t = − 1.08, p = 0.29). The scores of social function as measured by the GAF (69.8 ± 9.8 vs. 72.6 ± 8.8, df = 41, t = 3.50, p = 0.001) and the C-SFS (75.2 ± 8.8 vs. 78.1 ± 9.5, df = 41, t = 2.59, p = 0.01) increase significantly after the intervention. The weekly wages earned from sheltered or supported employment also increased significantly after the rehabilitation program (37.5 ± 35.5 vs. 43.6 ± 38.0, df = 41, t = 2.57, p = 0.01). Weekly working hours did not significantly change after the intervention (20.0 ± 7.6 vs. 21.9 ± 8.7, df = 41, t = 1.72, p = 0.09). The increase of income among the service users primarily came from two participants with supported employment originally obtaining competitive employment of care attendant in daycare center and eight shifting the sheltered work to supported employment, housekeeping for the elderly persons.

Table 4 Pre- vs. post-interventions: social support, mental health, psychiatric symptoms, social function, and earned income


In this pilot study, the trained peers could cooperate with therapists in the extended work training course to enhance the social and occupational functions of service users with schizophrenia through the integration of peer support services into the current community settings for mental health in Taiwan. The correlation between social support and occupation has been reported in previous studies [25, 26]. In Switzerland, Rüesch et al. found that subjects (261 persons with schizophrenia or affective disorders) with an occupation tended to have a larger social network and that social support mediated the relationship between occupation and quality of life. However, income was barely or even negatively related to subjects’ perceived quality of life [26]. Rollins and colleagues also reported that workplace network characteristics positively correlated with job satisfaction, after studying 100 persons with severe mental illnesses in Chicago [25]. Yet, workplace network characteristics were not strongly related to hourly wages or the overall job tenure, indicating declining perceived social network support (from supervisors and coworkers) with job tenure [25].

Contrariwise, a significant improvement in weekly wage was found in the current study after persons with schizophrenia received vocational rehabilitation support co-delivered by peers (Table 4). Two factors may have contributed to these divergent findings. First, the pilot program proposed in this study emphasized support from peers who also suffer from mental illnesses themselves, which further enriched the quality of the support and connection between peer support workers and service users. Studies by Rüesch et al. and Rollins et al. examined, instead, the more common social network support at the workplace (from supervisors and coworkers who were not mental illness patients) [25, 26]. Secondly, most of the persons with schizophrenia in our study were middle-aged, had an earlier onset of mental illness, and had a long history of hospitalization. As various dimensions of social support dwindled over time, the peer co-delivered service support proved particularly timely to bridge the growing gap in their need for support. These two factors might also explain the findings in this study showing that the social support from friends or peers (SSS-F) was the only dimension that scored significantly higher after the intervention, despite scoring the lowest among all 3 social support dimensions before the intervention (Table 4).

It is worth noting that the weekly wage earned by the 42 service users in the pilot program grew by 16.7% after the intervention. This increase contrasted with a growth of merely 5% (43.3 USD to 45.5 USD) among the 156 persons with mental illness participating in the supported employment program from 2017 to 2018 at the community rehabilitation center in Yuli. Hence, the peer co-delivered rehabilitation intervention proposed in this study appears to improve the occupational function of persons with mental illness more than the regular rehabilitation program.

Our study also revealed positive effects on social functions of persons with schizophrenia after they received peer co-delivered interventions, as measured both subjectively (C-SFS) and objectively (GAF) (Table 4). This finding echoes the evidence documented in the literature that peer support services can yield more improvement in social functions among individuals with mental illnesses than traditional mental health care. This positive outcome may be derived from the more robust social engagement of service users with peer support workers through mutual interactions and as peer support workers shared their own recovery stories [27]. In our study, as social function also measures the occupational dimension, a higher score associated with the employment component can also lift up the overall social function score. Additionally, the care and skills training that service users received from peer support workers contributed positively to service users’ social functions.

Improvements in psychiatric symptoms and reduced rehospitalization have been reported in studies of persons with mental illness who received peer-delivered services as part of case management [11, 28]. Our study also demonstrated diminished psychiatric symptoms among persons with schizophrenia after peer co-delivered interventions (Table 4). This positive outcome may be underscored by the multi-pronged emphasis placed on mental illness management throughout the vocational rehabilitation sessions. To ensure that service users are ready to care for the elderly with disabilities or dementia (one of the objectives of vocational rehabilitation in this pilot program), the learning of coping skills for psychotic symptoms was elaborated on during the workplace problem-solving sessions and reinforced through role-playing under demonstration by peers. Peer support workers also served as “role models” for service users by sharing experiences of how they managed their own illnesses. Peer support workers’ empathic and nonjudgmental attitudes were conducive to establishing equal relationships with service users, which allowed peer support workers to share their creativity and knowledge with service users and address challenges arising from mental illnesses [8, 27].

Although there was no significant change to mental health in the service users after peer co-delivered intervention (Table 4), the participant with the worst mental health among the users suffered from acute exacerbation of psychosis during the service period. As the vocational rehabilitation program helped service users acquire new care skills, the program also added stress to service users by requiring them to juggle between their current employment and the extended vocational training. The peers or therapists could monitor how service users who are suffering more from mental illness are adjusting during the service period to prevent from acute psychosis under the stress.

There are a number of limitations in this study. First, there was no control group or blind procedure, so possible confounding factors were not excluded, such as the improvement of the vocational rehabilitation system as a whole in the society and changes of wage in the overall labor market during the study period. Second, whether the benefits observed during the current study can be sustained over a longer period of time remains unknown, given the lack of long-term follow-up. The positive effects demonstrated could be the result of focused attention paid during the relatively short timeframe, or the design and implementation of the program by participating professionals trained in various medical disciplines.


Peer co-delivered services, when integrated into an extended vocational rehabilitation program, can enhance the social support received by persons with schizophrenia and improve their occupational function. The pilot program proposed in the current study can be a model for non-Western countries where only limited resources are allocated from the government to support persons with schizophrenia. The pilot program can also serve as the basis for building a more advanced vocational rehabilitation system jointly supported by peer support workers and trained professionals. The results of this pilot study should be confirmed by further randomized controlled trials to further understand the benefits and risks of peer co-delivered services in the settings of supported employment, especially occupational outcomes and changes in mental illness courses.

Availability of data and materials

The data used and/or analyzed in this study are available upon request from the first author.



Social Support Scale


Chinese Health Questionnaire-12


Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale-18


Global Assessment of Function


Chinese version of the Social Functioning Scale


  1. 1.

    Marwaha S, Johnson S. Schizophrenia and employment - a review. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2004;39(5):337–49.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Lysaker PH, Davis LW. Social function in schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder: associations with personality, symptoms and neurocognition. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2004;2(1):15.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Rosenheck R, Leslie D, Keefe R, McEvoy J, Swartz M, Perkins D, et al. Barriers to employment for people with schizophrenia. Am J Psychiatry. 2006;163(3):411–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Verhaeghe M, Bracke P, Bruynooghe K. Stigmatization and self-esteem of persons in recovery from mental illness: the role of peer support. Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2008;54(3):206–18.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Jones N, Corrigan PW, James D, Parker J, Larson N. Peer support, self-determination, and treatment engagement: a qualitative investigation. Psychiatr Rehabil J. 2013;36(3):209–14.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Wrobleski T, Walker G, Jarus-Hakak A, Suto MJ. Peer support as a catalyst for recovery: a mixed-methods study. Can J Occup Ther. 2015;82(1):64–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Mead S, Hilton D, Curtis L. Peer support: a theoretical perspective. Psychiatr Rehabil J. 2001;25(2):134–41.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Thomas EC, Salzer MS. Associations between the peer support relationship, service satisfaction and recovery-oriented outcomes: a correlational study. J Ment Health. 2018;27(4):352–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Lloyd-Evans B, Mayo-Wilson E, Harrison B, Istead H, Brown E, Pilling S, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials of peer support for people with severe mental illness. BMC Psychiatry. 2014;14(1):39.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Davidson L, Chinman M, Sells D, Rowe M. Peer support among adults with serious mental illness: a report from the field. Schizophr Bull. 2006;32(3):443–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Sledge WH, Lawless M, Sells D, Wieland M, O'Connell MJ, Davidson L. Effectiveness of peer support in reducing readmissions of persons with multiple psychiatric hospitalizations. Psychiatr Serv. 2011;62(5):541–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Modini M, Tan L, Brinchmann B, Wang MJ, Killackey E, Glozier N, et al. Supported employment for people with severe mental illness: systematic review and meta-analysis of the international evidence. Br J Psychiatry. 2016;209(1):14–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Marino LA, Dixon LB. An update on supported employment for people with severe mental illness. Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2014;27(3):210–5.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Balogun-Mwangi O, Rogers ES, Maru M, Magee C. Vocational peer support: results of a qualitative study. J Behav Health Serv Res. 2019;46(3):450–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Yam KKN, Lo WTL, Chiu RLP, Lau BSY, Lau CKS, Wu JKY, et al. A pilot training program for people in recovery of mental illness as vocational peer support workers in Hong Kong - job buddies training program (JBTP): a preliminary finding. Asian J Psychiatr. 2018;35:132–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Kern RS, Zarate R, Glynn SM, Turner LR, Smith KM, Mitchell SS, et al. A demonstration project involving peers as providers of evidence-based, supported employment services. Psychiatr Rehabil J. 2013;36(2):99–107.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Ministry of Health and Welfare in Taiwan. The Statistics of Psychiatric Treatment and Community Mental Health Resource. Accessed 20 April 2020.

  18. 18.

    World Health Organization. Mental Health Service Availability. Accessed 20 April 2020.

  19. 19.

    Cheng KY, Chen SY, Lin CY. Mortality among patients with schizophrenia and vocational rehabilitation program services under Taiwan's psychiatric care reform. Int J Ment Health Syst. 2016;10(1):32.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Sung SC, Yeh MY. Factors related to quality of life in depressive outpatients in Taiwan. Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2007;61(6):610–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Chong MY, Wilkinson G. Validation of 30- and 12-item versions of the Chinese health questionnaire (CHQ) in patients admitted for general health screening. Psychol Med. 1989;19(2):495–505.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Bell M, Milstein R, Beam-Goulet J, Lysaker P, Cicchetti D. The positive and negative syndrome scale and the brief psychiatric rating scale. Reliability, comparability, and predictive validity. J Nerv Ment Dis. 1992;180(11):723–8.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Jones SH, Thornicroft G, Coffey M, Dunn G. A brief mental health outcome scale-reliability and validity of the global assessment of functioning (GAF). Br J Psychiatry. 1995;166(5):654–9.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Song LY, Singer M. The social functioning of persons with chronic mental illness: an empirical typology of consumers and correlates of social functioning. Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2001;47(1):36–51.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Rollins AL, Bond GR, Jones AM, Kukla M, Collins LA. Workplace social networks and their relationship with job outcomes and other employment characteristics for people with severe mental illness. J Vocat Rehabil. 2011;35(3):243–52.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Rüesch P, Graf J, Meyer PC, Rossler W, Hell D. Occupation, social support and quality of life in persons with schizophrenic or affective disorders. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2004;39(9):686–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Repper J, Carter T. A review of the literature on peer support in mental health services. J Ment Health. 2011;20(4):392–411.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Scanlan JN, Hancock N, Honey A. Evaluation of a peer-delivered, transitional and post-discharge support program following psychiatric hospitalisation. BMC Psychiatry. 2017;17(1):307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


The authors would like to thank Meng-Ping Kao, Ching-Hui Wu, and Po-Yu Chen for assisting the extended vocational training program and data collection. We also deeply appreciate Huey-Hwa Jiang, Yi-Lin Wang, Wen-Fa Chen, Hsin-Mien Yang, and Sue-Ling Yang for training the peer support workers, and Fang-Pei Chen for intellectual discussions about the study results.


This study was supported by the grant from the Workforce Development Agency of Minister of Labor, Taiwan in the design of study and data collection and the Research Foundation of Taipei Veterans General Hospital Yuli Branch in data analysis, result interpretation and manuscript writing.

Author information




CKY conceived the study, collected and analyzed data, and wrote the manuscript. YCF supervised the study process and manuscript writing. Both authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kan-Yuan Cheng.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This service development program was agreed to and initiated by the Minister of Labor in Taiwan. The team also applied for approval from the Institute Review Board of the Antai Tian-Sheng Memorial Hospital (#18–062-B) and received permission to use the service record under the informed consent signed by participants.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cheng, KY., Yen, CF. The social support, mental health, psychiatric symptoms, and functioning of persons with schizophrenia participating in peer co-delivered vocational rehabilitation: a pilot study in Taiwan. BMC Psychiatry 21, 268 (2021).

Download citation


  • Peer support
  • Mental illness
  • Vocational rehabilitation