Skip to main content
Download PDF

Analysis of occupational stress and its correlation with oxidative-antioxidant levels among employees of a power grid enterprise in Guangdong

BMC Psychiatry volume 22, Article number: 593 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Occupational stress and its health effects on occupational populations have attracted extensive attention from researchers in public health. The stressors faced by employees of power grid enterprises are increasing progressively, which is easy to cause occupational stress. The balance of the body’s oxidative-antioxidant levels plays an essential role in maintaining the body’s health status. This study aims to explore occupational stress and its correlation with oxidative-antioxidant levels in employees of a power grid enterprise.

Methods

A cluster random sampling method was used to investigate the basic information of 528 employees in a power grid enterprise and investigate the two occupational stress models of employees by using the Job Content Questionnaire based on the job demand-control-support (JDC) model, and the Effort-Reward Imbalance Questionnaire based on the effort-reward imbalance (ERI) model, respectively. Peripheral blood samples were collected from the employees to measure the levels of malondialdehyde (MDA), total antioxidant capacity (TAC), and superoxide dismutase (SOD). The correlation between different models of occupational stress level and the body’s oxidation-antioxidation level was further explored.

Results

The detection rate of high JDC model occupational stress was 50.6% and the detection rate of high ERI model occupational stress was 50.9%. The JDC model occupational stress was significantly associated with high-temperature and high-altitude operation, visual display terminal operation, monthly income, and exercise (all P < 0.05). The ERI model occupational stress was significantly associated with visual display terminal operation (all P < 0.05). The results of the generalized additive model showed that SOD levels had a non-linear relationship with the D/C ratio as well as the E/R ratio. With the D/C ratio close to 1, SOD levels raised rapidly. When the E/R ratio exceeded 1, the SOD level raised rapidly (all P<0.05) . TAC levels were negatively associated with the E/R ratio (P < 0.05).

Conclusion

The detection rates of occupational stress in both models among employees in a power grid enterprise are higher. ERI model occupational stress was associated with body TAC and SOD levels, and JDC model occupational stress was associated with body SOD levels.

Peer Review reports

Background

In recent years, occupational stress, characterized by increased job strain and effort-reward imbalance, has been detected more frequently due to changes in working conditions and organizational forms caused by globalization, technological innovation, and digitalization [1]. As a significant occupational health problem related to personal physical and mental health as well as work efficiency, occupational stress, also regarded as job strain or work stress, is the status of long-term exposure to occupation-related stressors that affect overall health [2, 3]. Long-term occupational stress not only causes mental and psychological problems, such as anxiety, depression, and burnout [4, 5], but also increases the risk of coronary heart disease, skeletal muscle disease, and other physical diseases [6, 7], which leads to a decrease in job satisfaction [8], turnover tendency [9] and sickness absence rate of the occupational population [10]. Focusing on stressors and taking measures to reduce occupational stress in occupational populations can improve the physical and mental health of employees [2] but also lead to higher economic benefits in terms of increased productivity through reduced absenteeism [11].

There was moderate level evidence from previous studies that high job demands, low job control, high effort-reward imbalance, low relational justice, low procedural justice, role stress, bullying, low social support in the workplace, and other occupational stressors are associated with mental health [12]. Intense job demands can contribute to constant stress and ultimately emotional exhaustion [13]. The altered secretion of cortisol caused by occupational stress mobilizes the energy needed to facilitate adaptation to environmental demands and generates an adaptive load that leads to “wear and tear” of the brain and body [14]. Occupational stressor has the potential to deplete physical and mental resources, which can deplete energy and lead to mental health symptoms if not given sufficient opportunity to replenish resources [15].

The job demand-control (JDC) model and the effort-reward imbalance (ERI) model are two assessment models that have an excellent explanatory effect on occupational stress. The combination of the JDC and ERI models can explain more differences in health outcomes and provide a basis for the formulation of occupational stress interventions [16]. The JDC model assumes that a mismatch between low job control (skill utilization, decision authority, personal control, and decision-making ability) and high job demand (workload, work rhythm, conflict requests, and insufficient time to perform tasks) regulation leads to occupational stress [17]. Focusing on the role of different task characteristics and job control, the JDC model is suitable for examining psychosocial job characteristics in the workplace [15]. At present, the JDC model is mostly used for medical staff, workers, civil servants, bus drivers, and other job groups, because naturally, these jobs pose some demand and control over work. The ERI model, incorporating both situational (extrinsic) and personal (intrinsic) characteristics, assumes that effort at work should properly obtain the reward, and the difference between the two will lead to disturbing and distressing events [13]. Effort refers to the perceived needs of the worker in performing the task, such as job tasks, duties, and so on. Reward such as money, respect, job security, job recognition, career prospects, job security, status, and so on, in turn, implies the benefits that result from effort [17]. In contrast to the JDC model, the ERI model focuses on the violation of reciprocal communication between employees and employers/managers [18]. Previous studies using the ERI model mostly focus on the medical staff, polices, teachers, and other committed personnel dealing with interpersonal communication.

With the rapid development of the social economy, grid enterprises’ workload of power generation, transmission, and distribution has gradually increased [19]. Power grid enterprise employees, especially those in different positions such as management, maintenance, dispatching, and substation operation, need to adjust work tasks and deal with emergency problems according to the structure of consumer load demand [20]. Not only are they exposed to occupational hazards such as noise, high temperature and altitude, video display terminal (VDT) operation, and electromagnetic radiation (EMR), but they are also exposed to stressors such as shift work, which can lead to increased risk of occupational stress [21, 22].

Oxidative stress (OS) is the imbalance of oxidative and antioxidant levels caused by the excessive synthesis of reactive oxygen species (ROS) or the disturbance of the body’s antioxidant system, which eventually leads to adverse reactions such as apoptosis and inflammation [23]. Oxidative stress is associated with various chronic diseases and pathologies, including diabetes, neurodegenerative diseases, obesity, liver and kidney damage, DNA damage, mitochondrial dysfunction, etc. [24] Commonly used markers of oxidative stress include malondialdehyde (MDA), total antioxidant capacity (TAC), and superoxide dismutase (SOD). MDA is a biomarker of oxidative damage and is produced in vivo through the peroxidation of polyunsaturated fatty acids, which can interact with proteins and participate in the pathological development of diabetes, chronic kidney disease, and cognitive impairment [25]. The antioxidant system in the body consists of endogenous antioxidant enzymes and non-enzymatic antioxidants. As an essential endogenous antioxidant enzyme, SOD controls the levels of reactive oxygen and nitrogen species by catalyzing the dismutation of superoxide into hydrogen peroxide and oxygen [26]. TAC can be used to reflect the total ability of the body to scavenge reactive oxygen/nitric oxide enzymes by intercepting and terminating free radical chain reactions and deactivating free radicals and oxidants through non-enzymatic antioxidants in the body, including vitamin E, vitamin C, and vitamin A [27], which is a measure of the total antioxidant capacity of the body.

Studies have shown that various stressors can increase glucocorticoids by activating the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis and that the inflammatory responses caused by stress can be dynamically regulated with oxidative stress processes to help the body adapt to different environments and maintain homeostasis in the body, which may have protective or detrimental effects [28]. There is no unified conclusion about the correlation between occupational stress and oxidative stress indicators. Studies of the ERI model occupational stress found a significant positive correlation between over-commitment and E/R ratio and MDA levels [29, 30]. Another survey of occupational stress in nurses found that the occupational stress level was negatively correlated with TAC and SOD [31]. Some studies have found a positive correlation between occupational stress and SOD [32,33,34,35]. However, some researchers did not find a significant association between TAC and occupational stress [30]. There are few studies on the correlation between occupational stress and oxidative-antioxidant levels in occupational populations, especially among employees in power grid enterprises. Therefore, the correlation between occupational stress and oxidative-antioxidant levels deserves further study. In this study, two occupational stress models were used to investigate the factors associated with the occupational stress of employees in a power grid enterprise and to analyze the correlation between occupational stress and oxidative-antioxidant levels. The results could provide a scientific basis for effective occupational stress interventions to improve employees’ physical and mental health and promote the healthy development of power grid enterprises.

Methods

Participants

A cluster random sampling method was used to select 528 workers from a power grid enterprise in Guangdong as the study population. Inclusion criteria for the study participants included age ≥ 18 years, working years≥1 year, no diagnosed psychiatric disorders and no family history of psychiatric disorders. The questionnaires were investigated face-to-face by trained investigators. Informed consent was obtained from participants. The study was reviewed and approved by the Committee for Medical Ethics of Guangdong Province Hospital for Occupational Disease Prevention and Treatment.

The demographic questionnaire

The survey includes personnel number, general demographic characteristics (gender, age, marital status, education level), occupational characteristics (working years, work category, shift system, monthly income), occupational hazards (noise, electromagnetic radiation, high-temperature and high-altitude operation, visual display terminal operation) and lifestyle (smoking situation, drinking situation, exercise situation, sleeping time). Smoking was defined as cumulative smoking > 100 cigarettes [36], drinking was defined as the frequency of drinking weekly≥3 times [37], exercise was defined as days of exercise per week ≥3 days and time per exercise > 10 min [38], sleeping time was divided into short (< 6 hours), medium (6 ~ hours) and long(7 ~ hours) groups [39].

Occupational stress survey

The Chinese version of the Job Content Questionnaire (JCQ) and the Effort-Reward Imbalance Questionnaire (ERIQ) were used to assess the JDC model and the ERI model occupational stress, respectively. Two kinds of questionnaires both used the 4-point Likert scale. Grading was scored on a scale from 1 to 4, which corresponded from ‘disagree entirely’ to ‘agree entirely’ in sequence. The JCQ contains three dimensions of job demand (5 items), job control (9 items), and social support (8 items), with a total of 22 items, The Cronbach’s alpha coefficients of three dimensions and the overall questionnaire were 0.767, 0.724, 0.912, and 0.898, respectively. The ERI contains three dimensions of effort (6 items), reward (11 items), and over-commitment (6 items), with a total of 23 items. The Cronbach’s alpha coefficients of three dimensions and the overall questionnaire were 0.841, 0.710, 0.728, and 0.863, respectively. The D/C ratio was calculated using the formula “job demand/(job control × 5/9)” [40]. The D/C ratio > 1 was defined as high JDC model occupational stress, and the D/C ratio ≤ 1 was defined as low JDC model occupational stress. The E/R ratio was calculated using “effort/(reward × 6/11)” [41]. The E/R ratio > 1 was defined as high ERI model occupational stress, and the E/R ratio ≤ 1 was defined as low ERI model occupational stress.

Testing of oxidative stress marker levels

Two weeks before the survey, the subjects were advised to avoid excessive alcohol consumption, a high-fat diet, and medication. All subjects have fasted for 12 hours before blood sample collection. Five milliliters peripheral venous blood was drawn from all subjects when the investigation was performed. Then plasma was collected by centrifugation at 4 °C, 2000 r/min for 5 min. The levels of MDA, TAC, and SOD in plasma were measured according to the instructions for the Lipid Oxidation (MDA) Assay Kit, Total SOD Activity Assay Kit (WST-8 method), and Total Antioxidant Capacity Assay Kit (ABTS method), respectively (Beyotime Biotechnology Co., Ltd.). The levels of MDA, TAC and SOD were measured at 535 nm, 734 nm, and 450 nm respectively using an enzyme marker. The levels of each oxidative-antioxidant index were calculated based on the standard curves. MDA, TAC, and SOD levels were measured in μM, mM, and units, respectively.

Quality control

Before the survey, the investigators are trained uniformly and introduced to the survey content and precautions for subjects. After a detailed explanation of the purpose and content of the survey by the surveyor to the respondents before the survey, face-to-face questioning is used to collect information from the study participants. The questionnaires were checked and collected on-site. Questionnaires with more than 10% of entries missing were rejected as invalid. Epidata double entry and consistency checks were carried out to ensure that the data were authentic and reliable.

Statistical analysis

EpiData 3.1 was used to build the database, and SPSS 25.0 software as well as R version 4.0.5 was used for statistical analysis. Firstly, we examined the association between individual characteristics and the detection rate of occupational stress. By comparing rates of count data (Pearson χ2 test), we identified any significant variables on occupational stress. To further made summary models, binary logistic regression analysis was used to examine the association between individual characteristics and occupational stress (enter method, with an entry criterion of 0.05 and an exclusion criterion of 0.10). The logistic regression models took into account all individual characteristic variables with P < 0.05 in the Pearson χ2 test and took the occupational stress group as the dichotomous outcome variable. Dummy variables were created for multi-categorical covariates (monthly income and sleeping time). Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) for each variable were reported.

Measurement data of oxidative-antioxidant levels were described as mean ± standard deviation. The comparison of means between two groups was performed using a t-test for two independent samples of data. The comparison of means among multiple groups was performed using ANOVA, and a two-by-two comparison between groups was performed using the Bonferroni test. To further examine the relationship between occupational stress and oxidative-antioxidant levels, we used generalized additive models (GAM) to conduct smooth curve fitting. The R package adopted in generalized additive models is the mgcv package. MDA, TAC, and SOD levels were analyzed as dependent variables, and E/R ratio and D/C ratio as independent variables respectively. The generalized cross-validation (GCV) method was used to select the number of nodes, and the cubic spline function was used to fit the curve. For the oxidative indexes that did not show a non-linear relationship with occupational stress, multiple linear regression was used to further explore variables significantly related to oxidative-antioxidant levels (stepwise method, with an entry criterion of 0.05 and an exclusion criterion of 0.10). Dependent variables were oxidative-antioxidant levels and independent variables with P < 0.05 in t-test or ANOVA. The results were reported by Beta and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) for each variable. The test level α = 0.05 (two-sided).

Results

Demographic characteristics

Among the 528 study subjects, 463 (87.7%) were male, and 65 (12.3%) were female. The average age was (39.04 ± 9.94) years old, and the average working years was (17.26 ± 11.21) years. More people were married, accounting for 76.1%. And 52.3% of those with an educational level of undergraduate. The work categories were mainly in substation operation and maintenance, accounting for 44.5 and 35.4%, respectively. There were 373 shift workers, accounting for 70.6%. Employees’ monthly income was mainly 5000 ~ and 7000 ~ yuan, accounting for 39 and 33%, respectively. Electromagnetic radiation exposure and high-temperature and high-altitude operation were more numerous, accounting for 62.5 and 62.7%, respectively. In comparison, noise exposure and visual display terminal operation accounted for 33.9 and 33.3%, respectively. The proportion of employees who smoke, drink and exercise is higher, accounting for 30.3, 65.5, and 75.6%, respectively. Most of the employees’ sleeping time was 6 ~ hours, accounting for 46.4%.

Occupational stress

As shown in Table 1, the detection rate of high occupational stress was 50.6% (267/528) for the JDC model and 50.9% (269/528) for the ERI model among the 528 study participants. In the JDC model, the differences in the detection rates of occupational stress between the groups of monthly income, high-temperature and high-altitude operation, visual display terminal operation, exercise situation, and sleeping time were all statistically significant (all P < 0.05). In the ERI model, the differences in the detection rates of occupational stress between the groups of gender, age, marital status, working years, noise, electromagnetic radiation, high-temperature and high-altitude operation and, visual display terminal operation were all statistically significant (all P < 0.05).

Table 1 Comparison with detection rates of occupational stress among employees with different individual characteristics
Full size table

To examine the association between sociodemographic variables and occupational stress in two different models, binary logistic regression analysis was performed by taking JDC and ERI occupational stress as dependent variables and the variables with the statistical difference (P < 0.05) in Table 1 as independent variables. The results of the analysis were shown in Tables 2 and 3. In the JDC model, high-temperature and high-altitude operation (OR = 2.168, 95% CI: 1.489 to 3.158), visual display terminal operation (OR = 1.815, 95% CI: 1.234 to 2.669), and exercise (OR = 0.591, 95% CI: 0.386 to 0.905) were significantly associated with occupational stress among the employees. Compared with the monthly income group of < 5000 yuan, both the monthly income group of 7000 ~ yuan (OR = 1.853, 95% CI: 1.093 to 3.142) and 9000 ~ yuan (OR = 3.031, 95% CI: 1.453 to 6.321) significantly increased the risk of JDC model occupational stress. In the ERI model, visual display terminal operation (OR = 2.146, 95% CI: 1.450 to 3.176) significantly increased the risk of occupational stress among the employees.

Table 2 Logistic regression analysis for factors associated with the JDC model occupational stress among employees
Full size table
Table 3 Logistic regression analysis for factors associated with the ERI model occupational stress among employees
Full size table

Oxidative-antioxidant level

The mean level of MDA, TAC, and SOD of the 528 participants was 1.907 ± 1.231 μM, 1.288 ± 0.175 mM, and 0.354 ± 0. 095 units, respectively. As shown in Table 4, the differences in MDA levels among workers of different age, marital status, education, working years, and EMR exposure were statistically significant (all P < 0.05). The differences in TAC levels among workers of different age, smoking, and drinking were statistically significant (all P < 0.05).

Table 4 The results of oxidative-antioxidation levels in employees with different individual characteristics
Full size table

In both JDC and ERI models, the serum SOD levels of employees in the high occupational stress group were higher than those in the low occupational stress group, and the differences were statistically significant (P < 0.05). In the ERI model, the serum TAC levels of employees in the high occupational stress group were lower than those in the low occupational stress group, and the differences were statistically significant (P < 0.05). See Table 5.

Table 5 Comparison of oxidative-antioxidation levels of employees with different levels of occupational stress
Full size table

The results of generalized additive models showed there were non-linear relationships between SOD with E/R ratio as well as D/C ratio, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). The non-linear relationships between TAC with E/R ratio are approximately statistically significant (P = 0.04) (Fig. S1). However, there were no non-linear relationships between TAC and D/C ratio, MDA and E/R ratio, as well as MDA and D/C ratio, without statistically significant difference (P = 0.16, P = 0.12, P = 0.56) (Figs. S2, S3 and S4). As shown in Fig. 1, the relationship between the SOD and D/C ratio is in an inverted L shape. When the D/C ratio is close to 1.0, SOD increases rapidly, and then tends to be flat. As shown in Fig. 2, when the E/R ratio was in the range of 0.5–1.0, SOD levels showed a U-shape. When the E/R ratio exceeded 1, SOD levels rose rapidly and then slowed down and reached a plateau. Compared with linear models of SOD levels about D/C ratio and E/R ratio respectively, nonparametric regression models constructed using the generalized additive models showed better effects, with statistically significant differences (P < 0.05).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Smooth curve fitting by the generalized additive model of SOD level and D/C ratio

Full size image
Fig. 2
figure 2

Smooth curve fitting by the generalized additive model of SOD level and E/R ratio

Full size image

The results of multiple linear regression analysis were shown in Fig. 3. In the stepwise regression model to test the correlation between D/C ratio or E/R ratio (independent variable) and MDA (dependent variable), we additionally adjusted variables as follows (with P < 0.05 in Table 4): age, marital status, educational level, working years, and electromagnetic radiation exposure. In stepwise regression models using MDA levels as the dependent variable, D/C ratio and E/R ratio were neither allowed to enter the models. While married (β = 0.288, 95% CI: 0.045 to 0.531) and EMR exposure (β = − 0.418, 95% CI: − 0.632 to − 0.204) were associated with the MDA levels. In the stepwise regression model to test the correlation between D/C ratio or E/R ratio (independent variable) and TAC (dependent variable), we additionally adjusted variables as follows (with P < 0.05 in Table 4): age, smoking, and drinking. In the model to test the correlation between TAC levels and JDC model occupational stress, the D/C ratio was neither allowed to enter the models, while drinking (β = − 0.041, 95% CI: − 0.072 to − 0.010) was correlated with the TAC levels. In the model to test the correlation between TAC levels and ERI model occupational stress, E/R ratio (β = − 0.065, 95% CI: − 0.127 to − 0.002) and drinking (β = − 0.041, 95% CI: − 0.072 to − 0.009) was correlated with the TAC levels.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Multiple linear regression analysis of factors associated with MDA and TAC levels of employees. Note: Independent variables assigned: marriage: single = 1, married = 2; EMR exposure, drinking: no = 0, yes = 1; E/R ratio are all continuous variables and are not assigned a value

Full size image

Discussion

Among occupational populations, general demographic characteristics, occupational characteristics, occupational hazards, and lifestyle all have potential impacts on occupational health. We conduct research on occupational stress as well as oxidative-antioxidant levels in specific occupational groups, and various variables on these aspects were looked at. In this case, a significant result may be obtained by chance by multiple comparisons. To avoid the statistical bias caused by the difference of variables in the multivariate analysis, we used the conservative Bonferroni test for a two-by-two comparison of means among multiple groups, performed smooth curve fitting by the generalized additive model, and only included significant variables in the univariate analysis as covariates to adjust the multivariate model.

The study result reveals that the detection rate of JDC and ERI model occupational stress among employees in a power grid enterprise was 50.6 and 50.9%, respectively. Our results were higher than Li et al. [19], who reported in 2015 that the detection rate of JDC and ERI model occupational stress among workers in a power supply was 28.7 and 19.4%, respectively. The possible explanations could be the increasing demand for power supply, the heavier workload of power supply grid enterprises, and the increase in stressors, which may affect employees’ mental health. In the present study, high-temperature and high-altitude operation, visual display terminal operation, monthly income, and exercise situation were significantly associated with JDC model occupational stress. Statistically significant associations were also found between the visual display terminal operation and ERI model occupational stress among employees in a power grid enterprise.

Martinez et al. [22] used the Work Stress Scale (WSS) to survey workers’ stress from a utility electric power company in Brazil and found that regular exercise and monthly income were negatively associated with stress levels, which is consistent with the findings of our study that exercise reduces JDC model occupational stress. It is possibly because exercise can reduce occupational stress by various mechanisms, such as decreased neural activity and increased parasympathetic activity, suggesting that exercise may help decrease stress levels. Our study found that the risk of JDC model occupational stress was higher in the group with higher monthly income. This may be due to differences in regional, time, and job content, the higher the monthly income of employees in our study, the higher rank in the enterprise, and more responsibility they possibly performed than just technical employees, thus increasing the risk of occupational stress. Our study found that high-temperature and high-altitude operations can increase the risk of occupational stress among employees in power grid enterprises, which may be related to significantly higher job demands. In addition, employees in positions such as maintenance and dispatch often work outdoors at high temperatures and altitudes, where changes in temperature and height can affect the expression levels and dynamic balance of neurotransmitters such as serotonin and dopamine in the brain [42]. As a lesser concern occupational hazard, visual display terminal operation often requires employees to maintain the same posture for long periods, focusing on the same position on the screen and the work content is repetitive and monotonous, often causing occupational stress, musculoskeletal problems, visual fatigue, and anxiety [43].

Our study found that MDA levels were significantly associated with marital status and electromagnetic radiation exposure and TAC levels were significantly associated with drinking. However, there were no statistically significant differences between the two models of occupational stress and MDA levels among employees in a power grid enterprise. Salem et al. [30] surveyed on the nurses’ population found a significant positive correlation between MDA levels and ERI model occupational stress. Previous studies found that due to the secretion of testosterone, aging, and other factors, males and young people have significantly lower MDA levels than females and old people, respectively [44, 45]. The difference between our study and Salem’s study may be because the subjects of our study were employees of a power grid enterprise, and a relatively large proportion of the study population was 40–50. In contrast, the population studied by Salem et al. was mainly a female nurse group aged 20–40 years.

Our results showed an approximately statistically significant non-linear relationship between the ERI model occupational stress and TAC levels(P = 0.04). Multiple linear regression analysis found a negative association between the ERI model occupational stress and TAC levels (P = 0.043), but this was much less significant than the correlation between the E/R ratio and SOD. This may be because our questionnaires did not contain dietary status factors to adjust for the relationship between occupational stress and TAC levels, leading to underestimation or overestimation of the association between exposure and outcome. Although non-enzymatic antioxidants are involved in maintaining redox homeostasis, the TAC levels may be reduced due to the dietary habits and composition of employees who were unable to supplement with antioxidants in a timely manner [26].

In addition to non-enzymatic antioxidants such as endogenous substances like bilirubin and nutritional compounds such as tocopherols, antioxidant enzymes such as SOD, as important antioxidant indicators, can enhance cellular defense by effectively neutralizing increased levels of oxidation in the body [26]. And another study suggests that environmental and psychological stress may promote inflammatory responses by activating the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis to increase cortisol levels, thereby causing changes in oxidative stress levels and increasing SOD levels [28]. In this study, the results of generalized additive models and smooth curve fitting shown with the increase of D/C ratio or E/R ratio, SOD levels rose rapidly when employees of the power grid enterprise shifted from the low occupational stress group to the high occupational stress group in particular. This suggests a greater change in the body’s oxidative stress changes when employees shift from low occupational stress to high occupational stress. Casado et al. [32,33,34] found higher levels of SOD activity in night shift nurses, palliative care workers, and prehospitalary emergency service, who had high job demand, stress, and burnout levels, suggesting that high occupational stress is associated with increased SOD levels, consistent with our study. Zhu et al. used the Occupational Stress Inventory (OSI) to investigate 172 nurses and found that SOD levels were positively associated with job risk and negatively associated with tolerance [35]. This suggests increasing job risk, which decreased job security and rewards as well as increased ERI occupational stress levels, was possibly associated with increasing SOD levels of employees in a power grid enterprise. For another, decreasing tolerance, which decreased job control and increased JDC occupational stress levels, was also probably associated with increasing SOD levels of subjects. Therefore, our study suggests that two models of occupational stress can cause oxidative stress among employees in a power grid enterprise and that antioxidant enzymes such as SOD, as the first line of defense, may neutralize oxidative damage in the body by increasing its expression level.

There are some limitations. For example, this study is a cross-sectional study of a power grid enterprise, and it is difficult to determine the causal association between occupational stress and oxidative stress levels. In addition, this study did not include a survey on diet, which may affect the analysis of the results. And this information needs to be considered in subsequent studies on occupational stress and oxidative-antioxidant levels in large samples.

Conclusion

In summary, monthly income, exercise, high-temperature, and high-altitude operation, and video display terminal operation are factors associated with the occupational stress of employees in power grid enterprises. JDC model occupational stress, ERI model occupational stress, drinking, EMR, and marital status are correlated with oxidative-antioxidant levels. With the development of power grid enterprises, the impact of changes in the working environment and job content on the mental health of workers may lead to changes in TAC and SOD levels. Power grid enterprises should introduce advanced equipment, improve the level of automation, reduce the difficulty of operation, and at the same time provide and ensure the supply to employees with cooling, anti-electromagnetic radiation, visual fatigue relief, and other labor protection appliance. It is also vital for enterprises to focus on employees’ work difficulties and mental health, especially high-income earners, which need to arrange regular medical check-ups and training on mental health for employees. Employees should also maintain moderate exercise, combine work and rest, reduce alcohol consumption, eat a balanced diet, and take timely supplements of foods rich in antioxidants.

There are few studies on the correlation between occupational stress and oxidative stress levels. Based on the occupational populations of power grid enterprise employees, our study comprehensively analyzes the correlation between two models occupational stress and oxidative stress from demographic characteristics, occupational characteristics, and lifestyle, especially in occupational hazardous. It could provide a scientific basis for early intervention and health risk assessment research of occupational stress in the occupational populations in power grid industry.

Availability of data and materials

The data that support the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Abbreviations

EMR:

Electromagnetic radiation

ERI:

Effort-reward imbalance

ERIQ:

Effort-Reward Imbalance Questionnaire

HPA:

Hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal

JCQ:

Job Content Questionnaire

JDC:

Job demand-control

MDA:

Malondialdehyde

OR:

Odds Ratio

OS:

Oxidative stress

ROS:

Reactive oxygen species

SOD:

Superoxide dismutase

TAC:

Total antioxidant capacity

VDT:

Video display terminal

References

  1. Rigó M, Dragano N, Wahrendorf M, Siegrist J, Lunau T. Work stress on rise? Comparative analysis of trends in work stressors using the European working conditions survey. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2021;94(3):459–74. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00420-020-01593-8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Şanlıtürk D. Perceived and sources of occupational stress in intensive care nurses during the COVID-19 pandemic. Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2021;67:103107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iccn.2021.103107.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Zhang M, Murphy B, Cabanilla A, Yidi C. Physical relaxation for occupational stress in healthcare workers: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Occup Health. 2021;63(1):e12243. https://doi.org/10.1002/1348-9585.12243.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Mengist B, Amha H, Ayenew T, Gedfew M, Akalu TY, Assemie MA, et al. Occupational stress and burnout among health Care Workers in Ethiopia: a systematic review and Meta-analysis. Arch Rehabil Res Clin Transl. 2021;3(2):100125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arrct.2021.100125.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Zhang X, Zhao K, Zhang G, Feng R, Chen J, Xu D, et al. Occupational stress and mental health: a comparison between frontline medical staff and non-frontline medical staff during the 2019 novel coronavirus disease outbreak. Front Psychiatry. 2020;11:555703. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2020.555703.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Wang C, Lê-Scherban F, Taylor J, Salmoirago-Blotcher E, Allison M, Gefen D, et al. Associations of job strain, stressful life events, and social strain with coronary heart disease in the Women's Health Initiative observational study. J Am Heart Assoc. 2021;10(5):e017780. https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.120.017780.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Li X, Yang X, Sun X, Xue Q, Ma X, Liu J. Associations of musculoskeletal disorders with occupational stress and mental health among coal miners in Xinjiang, China: a cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health. 2021;21(1):1327. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-11379-3.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Aloisio LD, Coughlin M, Squires JE. Individual and organizational factors of nurses' job satisfaction in long-term care: a systematic review. Int J Nurs Stud. 2021;123:104073. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2021.104073.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Said RM, El-Shafei DA. Occupational stress, job satisfaction, and intent to leave: nurses working on front lines during COVID-19 pandemic in Zagazig City, Egypt. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2021;28(7):8791–801. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-11235-8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Duchaine CS, Aubé K, Gilbert-Ouimet M, et al. Psychosocial stressors at work and the risk of sickness absence due to a diagnosed mental disorder: a systematic review and Meta-analysis. JAMA Psychiatry. 2020;77(8):842–51. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2020.0322.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. W Duchaine CS, Aubé K, Gilbert-Ouimet M, Vézina M, Ndjaboué R, Massamba V, et al. Implementing interventions to reduce work-related stress among healthcare workers: an investment appraisal from the employer's perspective. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2020;93(1):123–32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00420-019-01471-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Harvey SB, Modini M, Joyce S, Milligan-Saville JS, Tan L, Mykletun A, et al. Can work make you mentally ill? A systematic meta-review of work-related risk factors for common mental health problems. Occup Environ Med. 2017;74(4):301–10. https://doi.org/10.1136/oemed-2016-104015.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Suleman Q, Hussain I, Shehzad S, Syed MA, Raja SA. Relationship between perceived occupational stress and psychological well-being among secondary school heads in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan. PLoS One. 2018;13(12):e0208143. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0208143.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Marchand A, Juster RP, Durand P, Lupien SJ. Work stress models and diurnal cortisol variations: the SALVEO study. J Occup Health Psychol. 2016;21(2):182–93. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0039674.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Sawhney G, Jennings KS, Britt TW, Sliter MT. Occupational stress and mental health symptoms: examining the moderating effect of work recovery strategies in firefighters. J Occup Health Psychol. 2018;23(3):443–56. https://doi.org/10.1037/ocp0000091.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Jachens L, Houdmont J. Effort-reward imbalance and job strain: a composite Indicator approach. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019;16(21):4169. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16214169 PMID: 31671748; PMCID: PMC6862176.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Gomes MR, Araújo TM, Soares JFS, Sousa CC, Lua I. Occupational stressors and work accidents among health workers. Rev Saude Publica. 2021;55:98. https://doi.org/10.11606/s1518-8787.2021055002938.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Hoven H, Wahrendorf M, Siegrist J. Occupational position, work stress and depressive symptoms: a pathway analysis of longitudinal SHARE data. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2015;69(5):447–52. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech-2014-205206.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Li H, Liu Z, Liu R, Li L, Lin A. The relationship between work stress and work ability among power supply workers in Guangdong, China: a cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health. 2016;16:123. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-016-2800-z.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Madurai Elavarasan R, Shafiullah GM, Raju K, Mudgal V, Arif MT, Jamal T, et al. COVID-19: impact analysis and recommendations for power sector operation. Appl Energy. 2020;279:115739. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.115739.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Meade RD, Lauzon M, Poirier MP, Flouris AD, Kenny GP. An evaluation of the physiological strain experienced by electrical utility Workers in North America. J Occup Environ Hyg. 2015;12(10):708–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/15459624.2015.1043054.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Martinez MC, Fischer FM. Stress at work among electric utility workers. Ind Health. 2009;47(1):55–63. https://doi.org/10.2486/indhealth.47.55.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Behl T, Makkar R, Sehgal A, Singh S, Sharma N, Zengin G, et al. Current trends in Neurodegeneration: cross talks between oxidative stress, cell death, and inflammation. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22(14):7432. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22147432.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Janciauskiene S. The beneficial effects of antioxidants in health and diseases. Chronic Obstr Pulm Dis. 2020;7(3):182–202. https://doi.org/10.15326/jcopdf.7.3.2019.0152.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Mas-Bargues C, Escrivá C, Dromant M, Borrás C, Viña J. Lipid peroxidation as measured by chromatographic determination of malondialdehyde. Human plasma reference values in health and disease. Arch Biochem Biophys. 2021;709:108941. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.abb.2021.108941.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Pisoschi AM, Pop A. The role of antioxidants in the chemistry of oxidative stress: a review. Eur J Med Chem. 2015;97:55–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmech.2015.04.040.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Sies H. Oxidative stress: concept and some practical aspects. Antioxidants (Basel). 2020;9(9):852. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox9090852.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Ghezzi P, Floridi L, Boraschi D, Cuadrado A, Manda G, Levic S, et al. Oxidative stress and inflammation induced by environmental and psychological stressors: a biomarker perspective. Antioxid Redox Signal. 2018;28(9):852–72. https://doi.org/10.1089/ars.2017.7147.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Bardhan R, Heaton K, Davis M, Chen P, Dickinson DA, Lungu CT. A cross sectional study evaluating psychosocial job stress and health risk in emergency department nurses. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019;16(18):3243. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16183243.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Salem EA, Ebrahem SM. Psychosocial work environment and oxidative stress among nurses. J Occup Health. 2018;60(2):182–91. https://doi.org/10.1539/joh.17-0186-OA.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Biganeh J, Ashtarinezhad A, Behzadipour D, Khanjani N, Tavakoli Nik A, Bagheri HM. Investigating the relationship between job stress, workload and oxidative stress in nurses. Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 2021:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1080/10803548.2021.1877456.

  32. Casado A, Castellanos A, López-Fernández ME, Ruíz R, Aroca CG, Noriega F. Relationship between oxidative and occupational stress and aging in nurses of an intensive care unit. Age (Dordr). 2008;30(4):229–36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11357-008-9052-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Casado Á, Castellanos A, López-Fernández ME, Ruiz R, López Imedio E, Castillo C, et al. Determination of oxidative and occupational stress in palliative care workers. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2011;49(3):471–7. https://doi.org/10.1515/CCLM.2011.061.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Moragón AC, De Lucas GN, Encarnación López Fernández M, Rodriguez-Manzaneque AS, Jimenez Fraile JA. Antioxidant enzymes, occupational stress and burnout in workers of a prehospitalary emergency service. Eur J Emerg Med. 2005;12(3):111–5. https://doi.org/10.1097/00063110-200506000-00003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Zhu L, Tian H, Mou Y, Tu L, Ge X. A research of antioxidant enzymes impact by nurse's occupational stress. J Neurosci Mental Health. 2011;11(5):530–3. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1009-6574.2011.05.034 in Chinese.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Dutra LM, Glantz SA. Electronic cigarettes and conventional cigarette use among U.S. adolescents: a cross-sectional study. JAMA Pediatr. 2014;168(7):610–7. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2013.5488.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Wilson MN, Langille DB, Ogilvie R, Asbridge M. When parents supply alcohol to their children: exploring associations with drinking frequency, alcohol-related harms, and the role of parental monitoring. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2018;183:141–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2017.10.037.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Rugbeer N, Ramklass S, Mckune A, van Heerden J. The effect of group exercise frequency on health related quality of life in institutionalized elderly. Pan Afr Med J. 2017;26:35. https://doi.org/10.11604/pamj.2017.26.35.10518.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Åkerstedt T, Ghilotti F, Grotta A, Zhao H, Adami HO, Trolle-Lagerros Y, et al. Sleep duration and mortality - does weekend sleep matter? J Sleep Res. 2019;28(1):e12712. https://doi.org/10.1111/jsr.12712.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Yi X, Li X, Ma X, Li F. The relationship between occupational stress and job burnout in coal miners: interactions between GCCR and SLC6A4 gene polymorphisms and the environment. J Affect Disord. 2022;297:76–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2021.10.002.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Kong L, Li W, Wang H, Xu N, Xu Q, Sun L, et al. The relationship between effort-reward imbalance and empathy among clinical nurses: a cross-sectional online survey. J Clin Nurs. 2020;29(17–18):3363–72. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.15367.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Liu J, Varghese BM, Hansen A, Xiang J, Zhang Y, Dear K, et al. Is there an association between hot weather and poor mental health outcomes? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Environ Int. 2021;153:106533. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2021.106533.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Sun CC, Lee CY, Hwang YS, Michihito I, Tagami K, Hsiao CH. Effect of warming eyelids on tear film stability and quality of life in visual display terminal users: a randomized controlled trial. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):16919. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-73779-6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Capuzzi E, Ossola P, Caldiroli A, Auxilia AM, Buoli M. Malondialdehyde as a candidate biomarker for bipolar disorder: a meta-analysis. Prog Neuro-Psychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2022;113:110469. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnpbp.2021.110469.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Zhu M, Liu Z, Guo Y, Sultana MS, Wu K, Lang X, et al. Sex difference in the interrelationship between TNF-α and oxidative stress status in first-episode drug-naïve schizophrenia. J Neuroinflammation. 2021;18(1):202. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12974-021-02261-5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank all the participants who helped to get the written informed consent about the survey and to distribute the questionnaires to the subjects.

Funding

This research was supported by the Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Occupational Disease Prevention and Treatment (grant number: 2017B030314152), the Medical Scientific Research Foundation of Guangdong Province (grant numbers: A2019246, A2021209) and the Guangzhou Science and Technology Plan Project (grant numbers: 202102080135).

Author information

Author notes

  1. Lingyu Zhang and Bin Liu contributed equally to this work.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Guangdong Province Hospital for Occupational Disease Prevention and Treatment, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Occupational Disease Prevention and Treatment, Guangzhou, 510300, Guangdong, China

    Lingyu Zhang, Bin Liu, Linqian Zhou, Yashi Cai, Weizhen Guo, Weixu Huang, Xuehua Yan & Huifeng Chen

  2. School of Public Health, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 511436, Guangdong, China

    Lingyu Zhang & Linqian Zhou

  3. Shenzhen Luohu People’s Hospital, Shenzhen, 518000, Guangdong, China

    Bin Liu

  4. School of Public Health, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510515, Guangdong, China

    Yashi Cai

Authors
  1. Lingyu Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Bin Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Linqian Zhou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Yashi Cai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Weizhen Guo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Weixu Huang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Xuehua Yan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Huifeng Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

LYZ undertook the statistical analysis and wrote the paper; BL, XHY and HFC designed the study. BL and LQZ performed the survey, collected data and input data. YSC, WZG,WXH and HFC made valuable suggestions and revised the manuscript. XHY and HFC are the corresponding authors. The author(s) read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Xuehua Yan or Huifeng Chen.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by the Committee for Medical Ethics of Guangdong Province Hospital for Occupational Disease Prevention and Treatment (GDHOD MEC 2010034). The study process was in accordance with the ethical standards. This study gained informed consent from all the participants. The data obtained was kept confidential and anonymous to protect their privacy.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1: Fig. S1.

Smooth curve fitting by the generalized additive model of TAC level and E/R ratio.

Additional file 2: Fig. S2.

Smooth curve fitting by the generalized additive model of TAC level and D/C ratio.

Additional file 3: Fig. S3.

Smooth curve fitting by the generalized additive model of MDA level and E/R ratio.

Additional file 4: Fig. S4.

Smooth curve fitting by the generalized additive model of MDA level and D/C ratio.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, L., Liu, B., Zhou, L. et al. Analysis of occupational stress and its correlation with oxidative-antioxidant levels among employees of a power grid enterprise in Guangdong. BMC Psychiatry 22, 593 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-022-04226-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-022-04226-1

Keywords

BMC Psychiatry

ISSN: 1471-244X

Contact us