Skip to main content
Download PDF

Catatonia in adult anti-NMDAR encephalitis: an observational cohort study

BMC Psychiatry volume 23, Article number: 94 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Anti-N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (NMDAR) encephalitis is one of the most prevalent autoimmune encephalitis and is closely related to catatonia. This study aimed to investigate the clinical features and disease outcomes of adult catatonic anti-NMDAR encephalitis patients.

Methods

Adult patients diagnosed with anti-NMDAR encephalitis between January 2013 and October 2021 were retrospectively enrolled in this study. According to the Bush Francis Catatonia screening instrument (BFCSI), patients were divided into two groups: those with catatonia and those without catatonia. The modified Rankin scale (mRS), Clinical Assessment Scale for Autoimmune Encephalitis (CASE), Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI), Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) and 7-item Generalized Anxiety Disorder Questionnaire (GAD-7) scores were assessed at follow-up. The Mann–Whitney U test (nonparametric), Student’s t test (parametric), and chi-squared test were used to analyse the differences between the two groups.

Results

Eighty-four patients were recruited, including twenty-five catatonic patients and fifty-nine noncatatonic patients. Among them, 28 had positive antibody only in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), 4 had positive antibody only in serum and 52 had positive antibody both in CSF and serum. Catatonic patients experienced more disturbance of consciousness (p = 0.01), aggression (p = 0.046) and affective disorders (p = 0.043) than noncatatonic patients. The mRS scores of the catatonia group assessed at admission (p = 0.045) were worse than those of the non-catatonia group. Catatonic patients were more inclined to develop deep vein thrombosis (p = 0.003), decubitus (p = 0.046), pneumonia (p = 0.025), and to be admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) (p = 0.011) than noncatatonic patients. All patients in the catatonia group received first-line immunotherapy. At the 24-month follow-up, 2 patients in the catatonia group did not achieve good outcomes. At the last follow-up, the catatonia group had more relapses (p = 0.014) and more neuropsychiatric problems (p = 0.035).

Conclusions

Adult anti-NMDAR encephalitis patients with catatonia present distinct clinical features in disease course and are prone to experience more relapses and long-term neuropsychiatric problems than those without catatonia.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

Catatonia, a subtype of schizophrenia in the past, is a psychomotor syndrome consisting of several symptoms, such as stupor, mutism, and agitation. However, according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5) [1], the catatonic subtype of schizophrenia has been eliminated and catatonia can be diagnosed not only as an episode specifier for schizophrenia, but also as a specifier for major mood disorders and several other psychotic disorders. It can also be diagnosed as secondary to general medical condition and as unspecified category without clear recognition of underlying causes. In the 11th revision of the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-11), new diagnostic grouping has been added and catatonia can be divided into three conditions: (1) associated with another mental disorder; (2) induced by psychoactive substances, including medications; and (3) secondary catatonia due to a medical condition [2]. These changes made catatonia no longer limited to schizophrenia, but become an independent nosological entity, facilitating the identification of catatonia in the context of other psychotic disorders, the use of substances and general medical conditions, such as encephalitis [3, 4]. Several studies revealed that serious medical complications might occur if catatonia cannot be recognized and interventions are not initiated in a timely manner [5, 6]. With improper management, catatonia can be aggravated to malignant forms, namely neuroleptic malignant syndrome (NMS) or malignant catatonia (MC), usually presenting as hyperpyrexia and severe autonomic dysfunction or muscle rigidity with lethal potential [7, 8]. It is of great importance to recognize catatonia and signs of deterioration in patients with diseases with life-threatening conditions.

Anti-N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (NMDAR) encephalitis, mediated by antibodies against the GluN1 subunit of the NMDAR [9], is one of the most common types of autoimmune encephalitis and characterized by psychiatric symptoms, cognitive impairment, seizures, abnormal movements, autonomic dysfunction or a decreased level of consciousness. Catatonia is closely associated with anti-NMDAR encephalitis [10]. In a systematic review of all cases of catatonia in autoimmune diseases, anti-NMDAR encephalitis accounted for 72% of cases [11]. Although this proportion is large, only a few studies have focused on the description of catatonic syndrome in anti-NMDAR encephalitis [12,13,14]. In addition, autoimmune disease-related catatonia was found to be associated with other severe psychiatric features and more relapses in children [15]. Etiological treatment is fundamental for the treatment of catatonia secondary to various disorders. And benzodiazepines are recommended as the first-line symptomatic medication for catatonia. Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is an alternative treatment when benzodiazepines are ineffective or malignant situations occur. Other management strategies have also been proposed [16, 17]. The specific symptomatic therapies showed various efficacy in different populations and etiologies, and the treatment of etiology is sufficient or even more important than the specific one, for example in the elderly, schizophrenia spectrum disorders, obsessive-compulsive disorder, or in different cases of organic causes such as anti-NMDAR encephalitis [14, 18,19,20]. Although the treatment strategy for catatonia in anti-NMDAR encephalitis has not been well formulated, immunotherapy usually brought clinical improvement for catatonia in anti-NMDAR encephalitis [12]. The administration of antipsychotics is prevalent in anti-NMDAR encephalitis due to the high morbidity of psychiatric symptoms. Although in a few cases relief from agitation and psychotic symptoms is achieved in patients with catatonia, antipsychotic drugs can aggravate the syndrome and lead to malignant forms [21]. To date, research on the clinical features and prognosis of patients with catatonia in anti-NMDAR encephalitis is still lacking.

Therefore, the purposes of this study are as follows: (1) to describe the frequency, characteristics, treatment and clinical outcomes of catatonia in adults with anti-NMDAR encephalitis and (2) to explore the occurrence of severe complications and the malignant forms of catatonia in patients with anti-NMDAR encephalitis.

Methods and materials

Participants

For this single-centre retrospective observational cohort study, we consecutively enrolled inpatients definitively diagnosed with anti-NMDAR encephalitis, according to the criteria proposed by Graus et al. [22], at the Neurology Department of Tongji Hospital from January 2013 to October 2021. Antibodies were detected in serum or cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) by a commercial cell-based assay (CBA) before the initiation of immunotherapy and if only serum was available, antibody may also be tested by immunohistochemistry of rat brain. Patients who met the following criteria were excluded: (1) patients who could be reasonably diagnosed with other central nervous system disorders mimicking anti-NMDAR encephalitis; (2) patients with incomplete medical records; and (3) patients under the age of 18 years.

The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science and Technology. Informed consent was obtained from all patients or their representatives when the patients were unable to understand and provide valid consent. The anonymity of patients was preserved in the study.

Catatonia assessment

All patients were screened by the 14-item Bush-Francis Catatonia Screening Instrument (BFCSI) [23], the most widely used catatonia rating scale, given its excellent reliability and validity [24, 25]. When patients showed two or more out of the following 14 signs: excitement, immobility, mutism, staring, posturing, grimacing, echopraxia/echolalia, stereotypy, mannerisms, verbigeration, rigidity, negativism, waxy flexibility and withdrawal, they were assigned to the catatonia group. According to the symptoms present, catatonia was also divided into agitated, withdrawn or fluctuating types.

MC and NMS were both viewed as malignant forms of catatonia in this study [8, 26,27,28,29,30]. Patients with MC were defined as those with catatonia developing severe autonomic disorders (tachycardia, elevated/instable blood pressure, diaphoresis, and tachypnoea) and fever (body temperature ≥ 38.0 °C) [31]. According to the DSM-IV criteria, patients with NMS were characterized by severe muscle rigidity and elevated temperature and the additional presence of two or more of the following characteristic features: altered blood pressure, altered consciousness, diaphoresis, dysphagia, incontinence, laboratory evidence of muscle injury, leucocytosis, mutism, rigor, tachycardia and tremor.

Clinical variables and outcomes

The medical records of each patient were checked separately by 3 neurologists, and any discrepancies were discussed. The following information was collected: age, sex, duration of hospitalization, antibody titres in serum and CSF, major neuropsychiatric manifestations (psychotic symptoms, cognitive impairment, speech disturbance, seizures, movement disorder, change in consciousness and autonomic disturbance), presence and type of catatonia, presence of malignant forms of catatonia, presence of neoplasm, complications, immunotherapy received, psychiatric treatments prescribed (benzodiazepines and antipsychotics). We also obtained and recorded abnormal findings on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), electroencephalograpy (EEG) and CSF examinations. CSF was initially tested at a 1:1 dilution, and serum was tested at a 1:10 dilution. Antibody titres of 1:10 in serum or 1:1 in CSF were considered low, ≤ 1:100 in serum or ≤ 1:10 in CSF were considered moderate, and ≥ 1:320 in serum or ≥ 1:32 in CSF were considered high. In addition to catatonia, psychotic symptoms were subdivided into abnormal behaviour, psychosis (delusion or hallucination), mood (anxiety, depression, irritability and so on), sleep, suicidality, eating and obsessive-compulsive disorders [32]. First-line immunotherapy included corticosteroids, intravenous immunoglobulin and plasmapheresis. Second-line immunotherapy consisted of rituximab, cyclophosphamide and mycophenolate mofetil. The order of treatments administered or their combination within or between each line of treatments was not specified.

The Clinical Assessment Scale in Autoimmune Encephalitis (CASE) [33] is a novel severity scale for autoimmune encephalitis with good reliability and validity. To compare the outcomes at different courses, we evaluated both the modified Rankin scale (mRS) and CASE score at onset and at months 6, 12, and 24. Poor outcomes were defined as an mRS score ≥ 3 at follow-up. Unfavourable clinical outcomes were also defined by a CASE score ≥ 4 [34]. Relapse was identified as the presence of any new symptoms or a worsening of previous symptoms after being stable for 2 months. At the last follow-up, the Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI), the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) and the 7-item Generalized Anxiety Disorder Questionnaire (GAD-7) were administered to assess the long-term neuropsychiatric outcomes.

Statistical analysis

Data analysis was performed by SPSS software (version 26). Quantitative variables with a normal distribution are shown as the mean ± SD, and Student’s t test was applied for intergroup comparisons. Continuous variables with nonnormal distributions are presented as medians with interquartile ranges (IQRs) and were compared using the Mann–Whitney U test. Categorical variables are presented as frequencies (percentages) and were compared by either the chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test. Relapse frequency was analysed by Kaplan–Meier curves with log-rank statistics. A value of p less than 0.05 was considered significant.

Results

General findings

This study initially included 84 adult patients with anti-NMDAR encephalitis (Fig. 1). Eighty samples from CSF and 63 samples from serum were obtained. Among them, 28 had positive antibody only in CSF, 4 had positive antibody only in serum, and 52 had positive antibody both in CSF and serum. Twenty-six paediatric patients were excluded. Table 1 shows the main characteristics of our patients. Of the 84 patients, 53.6% were female and 46.4% were male. The median age was 29.0 (21.0-43.0) years. The median duration of hospitalization was 19.0 (13.0-31.0) days.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Flow chart of study patients

Full size image
Table 1 Characteristics and treatment in catatonia group and non-catatonia group with anti-NMDAR encephalitis
Full size table

The most prevalent manifestations in anti-NMDAR encephalitis according to frequency were as follows: psychiatric symptoms (81.0%), seizures (66.7%), cognitive dysfunction (59.5%), decreased level of consciousness (46.4%), speech disorder (42.9%), movement disorder (25.0%), and autonomic disturbance (22.6%). Thirty-three (39.3%) patients initially presented with psychiatric abnormalities. The proportion of patients with leucocytosis in CSF and abnormal EEG and MRI examinations was 71.4% (60/84), 70.6% (36/51) and 55.1% (43/78), respectively. Of the patients with EEG records, 31.4% (16/51) were with diffuse slow-wave activity, 21.6% (11/51) were with epileptiform discharges, 5.9% (3/51) were with extreme delta brush, 3.9% (2/51) were with focal slow-wave activity, and the remaining abnormal records (19.6%, 10/51) lacked detailed description, thus it was difficult to further analyse the significance of abnormal waveform like extreme delta brush in clinical. Of the patients with MRI records, 35.9% (28/78) had multifocal lesions, 16.7% (13/78) had lesions on temporal lobe, 5.1% (4/78) had lesions on other lobes. Three patients were found to have ovarian teratomas, and uterine leiomyoma was detected in one patient. A total of 35.0% (28/80) and 19.0% (12/63) of the patients had high antibody titres in CSF and serum, respectively. At admission, the median mRS score was 3. Overall, 95.2% (80/84), 6.0% (5/84) and 67.9% (57/84) of patients received first-line immunotherapy, second-line immunotherapy and antipsychotic drugs, respectively (Table 1).

At the 24-month follow-up, the median mRS score of 58 patients was 0 (0-2), and the median CASE score was 1 (1-3). A total of 15.5% of patients had poor outcomes according to mRS scores, and 19.0% had unfavourable outcomes according to CASE scores (Additional file 1: Supplementary Table S1). We kept contact with those patients to assess their long-term psychiatric outcomes. The mortality rate in this study was 7.1% (6/84) and 6 patients all died within 6 months of follow-up. In non-catatonic group, two patients died of severe pneumonia, two patients died of unclear causes and one patient was suspected to die of cerebral venous thrombosis. One catatonic patient died of multiple organ failure. Fifty-two patients were evaluated by the scales mentioned previously at the last follow-up (Table 2). The median time from discharge to the latest follow-up was 46 (30-76) months.

Table 2 Outcomes of patients with anti-NMDAR encephalitis between two groups at the last follow-up
Full size table

Catatonia group

Twenty-three patients were defined with catatonia according to BFCSI. Sixteen (64.0%) patients had a history of prodrome. Regarding the psychopathology of catatonic patients, 92.0% presented with abnormal behaviours, 24.0% presented with psychosis symptoms such as hallucinations and delusions, 52.0% exhibited mood disorders, 52.0% had sleep disturbances and 8.0% showed eating disorders (Table 1). One patient was diagnosed with ovarian teratoma. The most common signs of catatonia syndrome were excitement (68.0%), mutism (52.0%), negativism (44.0%) and immobility/stupor (24.0%). Symptoms such as echopraxia/echolalia, grimacing and mannerism were not found in medical records (Fig. 2). In the catatonia group, 28.0, 40.0, and 32.0% of patients were diagnosed with the agitated, withdrawn and fluctuating type of catatonia, respectively.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Frequency of catatonic signs and symptoms in catatonia group with anti-NMDAR encephalitis

Full size image

Patients in the catatonia group were more likely to have disturbance of consciousness (p = 0.01), aggression (p = 0.046) and mood disorders (p = 0.043) than those in the non-catatonia group (Table 1). The median mRS score assessed at onset was worse in the catatonia group (p = 0.045). There was no significant difference in antibody titres detected in serum (p = 0.864) or CSF (p = 0.971) between two groups.

All patients with catatonia received first-line immunotherapy. Thirteen (52.0%) patients received intravenous injection of gamma globulin, and three (12.0%) patients underwent plasmapheresis. Two (8.0%) patients received second-line immunotherapy. Antipsychotics were administered to 23 (92.0%) patients (p = 0.002). Benzodiazepines were used in 17 (68.0%) patients. The difference in the proportion of patients receiving first-line and second-line therapies did not reach significance (Table 1).

During the disease course, malignant forms of catatonia were recorded in 4 (16.0%) patients. All four of these patients suffered from significant hypotension. One of them had severe tachycardia, tachypnoea, sialorrhea and rigidity.

According to the findings of a detailed search, the occurrence rates of deep vein thrombosis, decubitus, pneumonia and acute kidney failure in the catatonia group were 24.0, 28.0, 64.0, and 4.0%, respectively. Catatonic patients were more likely to develop deep vein thrombosis (p = 0.003), decubitus (p = 0.046), pneumonia (p = 0.025), and to be admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) (p = 0.011) (Table 1).

At the 24-month follow-up, the long-term outcomes as determined by the mRS (p = 0.551) and CASE (p = 0.929) were not different between the groups with and without catatonia. Catatonic patients were more likely to suffer from relapses (p = 0.014) and neuropsychiatric problems (p = 0.035), and had a tendency to develop anxiety (p = 0.05) at the last follow-up (Table 2). The curve showing the relapse frequency of patients in different groups (p < 0.05) is presented in Fig. 3.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Frequency of relapses in catatonia group and non-catatonia group

Full size image

Discussion

Catatonia in anti-NMDAR encephalitis has drawn increasing attention, and this is the first study focusing on the long-term prognosis of adult patients with anti-NMDAR encephalitis and catatonia. In our study, we observed that (1) patients in the catatonia group tended to have more neuropsychiatric and medical complications during the acute stage; (2) the majority of patients with catatonia achieved favourable outcomes with use of immunotherapy; and (3) the presence of catatonia might serve as a predictor of more relapses and long-term neuropsychiatric problems. Considering the scarcity of research, our study provides a comprehensive view of catatonia in anti-NMDAR encephalitis.

Anti-NMDAR encephalitis predominates as the cause of autoimmune-related catatonia, accounting for 72% (249/346) of cases [11]. In two retrospective clinical studies, the incidence of catatonia in anti-NMDAR encephalitis was 13.9% (15/108) and 47% (14/30), respectively [35, 36]. And the rate was reported at 32.7% in a systematic literature review of 633 cases diagnosed with anti-NMDAR encephalitis [37]. Consistent with these findings, our study showed that the rate of catatonia in anti-NMDAR encephalitis was 29.8% (25/84), demonstrating the common catatonic manifestations in anti-NMDAR encephalitis. However, with multiple rating scales and improved criteria, the incidence rate was up to 70.6% in a prospective study recruiting 58 anti-NMDAR encephalitis [12]. It was even much higher (83.3%, 10/12) in a prospective study enrolling patients initially diagnosed with schizophrenia, mood disorder, or epilepsy with psychiatric symptoms [38]. It was also reported in another prospective research that four NMDAR antibody-positive patients whose initial diagnosis was mood disorder all showed catatonic symptoms [39]. The gap of prevalence between prospective and retrospective studies brought out the significance of consistent diagnostic protocols and systematic application of psychopathological measures, which could otherwise cause an underestimation or misdiagnosis of catatonia, especially for secondary catatonia. This may also explain the discrepancy of catatonic signs and symptoms, and accompanied neuropsychiatric symptoms between studies, as mentioned below.

The spectrum of clinical features of catatonia in anti-NMDAR encephalitis still needs to be explored. A review including 189 patients showed that the most frequent signs were immobility/stupor, mutism, excitement, posturing/catalepsy, stereotypy and rigidity [13]. In another review involving 30 cases, excitement, immobility/stupor, mutism, withdrawal, posturing, rigidity, stereotypy and perseveration were successively the most common catatonic symptoms [40]. Our study found that the most frequent catatonic signs in descending order were excitement, mutism, negativism and immobility/stupor, while symptoms such as echopraxia/echolalia, grimacing and mannerisms did not appear in the records. In a prospective study, Espinola-Nadurille et al. observed that the most prevalent catatonic symptoms were immobility, staring, mutism and posturing [12], which not only covered the results of the retrospective studies, but also reported additional common symptoms. Despite the limited number of patients, this discrepancy in signs and symptoms supported the heterogeneous presentations of catatonia in anti-NMDAR encephalitis. Moreover, the lack of consistent operational definitions and systematic division of psychopathology may also make the discrepancy. The stuporous type and the excited type are two classic types of catatonia [13]; however, approximately 33 to 56.1% of catatonic patients with anti-NMDAR encephalitis presented with fluctuations between stuporous and excited symptoms [12, 13, 40]. The fluctuating type was found in a large proportion of patients in our cohort (32.0%), replicating this unique phenomenon in catatonia with anti-NMDAR encephalitis.

Catatonia in anti-NMDAR encephalitis is likely to be accompanied by several neuropsychiatric symptoms. Espinola-Nadurille et al. reported catatonia with more delirium, hallucinations and psychomotor agitation during hospitalization [12]. Serra-Mestres et al. reported that catatonia was frequently combined with dysfunctions of psychosis, mood (anxiety, elation, or depression) and cognition [13]. In our study, we found that symptoms tended to occur together with signs such as aggression, mood disorder and decreased consciousness. The coexistence of those symptoms implied the complexity of the disease and well supported the wide use of psychiatric drugs in catatonia. Nevertheless, clinicians should be cautious about the risk of aggravating catatonia with drug management [21]. The proportion of malignant forms of catatonia caused by anti-NMDAR encephalitis was significantly higher than that due to other causes, with up to 46.7% of patients receiving antipsychotics suspected to have NMS [41]. The prospective study also displayed a high prevalence (12.1%) of NMS/MC [12]. Consistently, the occurrence rate of malignant forms in the present catatonia cohort was 16.0%. Another life-threatening condition in catatonia was the presence of severe medical complications [5]. Our catatonic patients were found to have more deep venous thrombosis, which might be why anticoagulant therapies have been recommended for prevention [42]. The high risk of complications might partially be related to the long-time immobile state and the failure to improve symptoms in a timely manner.

Several factors have been found to be closely associated with the pathogenesis of catatonia including gamma-aminobutyric-acid (GABA)-ergic and glutamatergic dysregulation [11], which was supported by the efficacy of benzodiazepines, the GABA-A receptor agonists, and NMDAR antagonists for the treatment of catatonia. In addition, the activation of the innate immune system, and adaptive immunity by the downstream effects of specific actions on extracellular antigens are also potential related factors [11]. The nosological changes in the DSM-5 [1] and ICD-11 [2] improved the recognition of catatonia due to multiple general medical conditions, indicating the core of etiological treatment in secondary catatonia. Thus, immunotherapy should be fundamental treatment for catatonia due to anti-NMDAR encephalitis, and the simultaneous management of specific treatment (such as benzodiazepines or ECT) and prevention of potential complications may be optimal. Similarly, a prospective study revealed that catatonic syndrome in patients with anti-NMDAR encephalitis was ameliorated by immunotherapy but not lorazepam, and 60% (3/5) of patients achieved only mild relief with ECT [12]. The low response to benzodiazepines may suggest variable underlying mechanisms of catatonia in anti-NMDAR encephalitis. In our cohort, 68.0% of catatonic patients received benzodiazepines, yet it is difficult to judge efficacy in a noncontrolled study. Unfortunately, we were also not able to observe the efficacy of ECT because of its unavailability at our centre. A review concluded that the application of atypical antipsychotics may alleviate the symptoms of non-MC and manic or psychotic episodes. In this cohort, atypical antipsychotics were frequently (92.0%) prescribed in the catatonia group and helped relieve agitation before immunotherapy in 25.0% (6/24). Approximately 42.1% (8/19) of catatonic patients failed to recover from psychiatric symptoms until immunotherapy. Our data suggested the critical value of immunotherapy and the potential positive efficacy of the combined regimen, which was recommended in a previous review [17, 43]. It is worth noting that antipsychotics were withdrawn in three catatonic patients after the aggravation to malignant forms of catatonia in our study, illustrating that the antipsychotics should be administered with caution.

In our study, we found that the catatonia group had higher mRS scores at admission and more ICU admissions, implying that catatonia may either be a marker or a result of a severe disease condition in the acute phase. Considering the causative hypothesis of catatonia, such symptoms might refer to more severe glutamatergic hypofunction in anti-NMDAR encephalitis. The long-term outcomes evaluated by the mRS and CASE were all good, and few differences were observed between the two groups, further indicating that severe glutamatergic dysregulation was immune-related and could be successfully remediated by timely immunotherapy. It has been reported that paediatric autoimmune encephalopathy patients with catatonia suffered more relapses [15]. We found a similar result in adult catatonic anti-NMDAR encephalitis patients. Why and how catatonia is related to relapses remain unknown. Consistent immunotherapy and symptomatic treatment are recommended in these patients.

Anxiety is frequently combined with catatonia [44,45,46], and catatonic psychiatric inpatients experienced more severe anxiety and affective symptoms than noncatatonic patients at the ictal stage [47]. It is quite interesting to follow up the long-term psychiatric outcomes in patients with anti-NMDAR encephalitis. Our catatonic patients scored poor on the GAD-7 and NPI at follow-up, adding evidence for a long-term relationship between mental behaviour and catatonia in anti-NMDAR encephalitis. However, both the mRS and CASE lack assessments of affective symptoms and catatonic symptoms. Given that, the improvement of long-term global neuropsychiatric evaluation is necessary, including comprehensive assessment combining scales for affective symptoms and specific scale for catatonia (such as the Bush-Francis Catatonia Rating Scale).

Limitations

Several limitations of this study should be acknowledged. First, our study included only adult patients, and the results do not necessarily apply to younger patients. Second, our study was retrospective, and we lost contact with some patients during follow-up, leading to bias. Third, the sample size of our single-centre study was small, and the statistical analysis was exploratory without Bonferroni correction between comparisons. Considering the limitations of the study, further large-scale and multicentre prospective studies are needed.

Conclusions

Our study revealed that the characteristics of catatonia in anti-NMDAR encephalitis are heterogeneous. Despite more neuropsychiatric and medical complications in the acute phase, catatonic patients with anti-NMDAR encephalitis can achieve favourable long-term outcomes with prompt immunotherapy initiation. Over the long term, patients with anti-NMDAR encephalitis with catatonia tend to suffer from more relapses and psychiatric problems than those without catatonia.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

NMDAR:

N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor

mRS:

Modified Rankin scale

CASE:

Clinical Assessment Scale for Autoimmune Encephalitis

NPI:

Neuropsychiatric Inventory

PHQ-9:

Patient Health Questionnaire-9

GAD-7:

7-item Generalized Anxiety Disorder Questionnaire

CSF:

Cerebrospinal fluid

ICU:

Intensive care unit

DSM-5:

Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition

ICD-11:

11th revision of the International Classification of Diseases

CSF:

Cerebrospinal fluid

BFCSI:

Bush-Francis Catatonia Screening Instrument

MC:

Malignant catatonia

NMS:

Neuroleptic malignant syndrome

MRI:

Magnetic resonance imaging

EEG:

Electroencephalograpy

IQRs:

Interquartile ranges

ECT:

Electroconvulsive therapy

GABA:

Gamma-aminobutyric-acid

References

  1. Tandon R, Heckers S, Bustillo J, Barch DM, Gaebel W, Gur RE, et al. Catatonia in DSM-5. Schizophr Res. 2013;150(1):26–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Reed GM, First MB, Kogan CS, Hyman SE, Gureje O, Gaebel W, et al. Innovations and changes in the ICD-11 classification of mental, behavioural and neurodevelopmental disorders. World Psychiatry. 2019;18(1):3–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Taylor MA, Fink M. Catatonia in psychiatric classification: a home of its own. Am J Psychiatry. 2003;160(7):1233–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Espi Forcen F, Respino M, Eloge J, Baldwin M, Burns K, Patron V, et al. Catatonia in the medically ill: differences and parallels in etiology, phenomenology and management. Int J Psychiatry Med. 2022;57(1):80–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Gross AF, Smith FA, Stern TA. Dread complications of catatonia: a case discussion and review of the literature. Prim Care Companion J Clin Psychiatry. 2008;10(2):153–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Worku B, Fekadu A. Symptom profile and short term outcome of catatonia: an exploratory clinical study. BMC Psychiatry. 2015;15:8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Blumer D. Catatonia and the neuroleptics: psychobiologic significance of remote and recent findings. Compr Psychiatry. 1997;38(4):193–201.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Fink M, Taylor MA. The many varieties of catatonia. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2001;251(Supplement 1):1.8–1.13.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Dalmau J, Graus F. Antibody-mediated encephalitis. N Engl J Med. 2018;378(9):840–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hansen N, Timaus C. Autoimmune encephalitis with psychiatric features in adults: historical evolution and prospective challenge. J Neural Transm. 2021;128(1):1–14.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Rogers JP, Pollak TA, Blackman G, David AS. Catatonia and the immune system: a review. Lancet Psychiatry. 2019;6(7):620–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Espinola-Nadurille M, Flores-Rivera J, Rivas-Alonso V, Vargas-Canas S, Fricchione GL, Bayliss L, et al. Catatonia in patients with anti-NMDA receptor encephalitis. Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2019;73(9):574–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Serra-Mestres J, Villagrasa-Blasco B, Thacker V, Jaimes-Albornoz W, Sharma P, Isetta M. Catatonia in N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antibody encephalitis: phenomenological characteristics from a systematic review of case reports. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2020;64:9–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Marques Macedo I, Gama MJ. Catatonia secondary to anti-N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (NMDAr) encephalitis: a review. CNS Spectr. 2020;25(4):475–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ferrafiat V, Riquin E, Freri E, Granata T, Nardocci N, Medjkane F, et al. Psychiatric autoimmune conditions in children and adolescents: is catatonia a severity marker? Prog Neuro-Psychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2021;104:9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Sienaert P, Dhossche DM, Vancampfort D, De Hert M, Gazdag G. A clinical review of the treatment of catatonia. Front Psychiatry. 2014;5:9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Beach SR, Gomez-Bernal F, Huffman JC, Fricchione GL. Alternative treatment strategies for catatonia: a systematic review. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2017;48:1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Jaimes-Albornoz W, Ruiz de Pellon-Santamaria A, Nizama-Vía A, Isetta M, Albajar I, Serra-Mestres J. Catatonia in older adults: a systematic review. World. J Psychiatry. 2022;12(2):348–67.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Tanguturi YC, Cundiff AW, Fuchs C. Anti-N-methyl D-aspartate receptor encephalitis and electroconvulsive therapy literature review and future directions. Child Adolesc Psychiatr N Am. 2019;28(1):79–+.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Rasmussen SA, Mazurek MF, Rosebush PI. Catatonia: our current understanding of its diagnosis, treatment and pathophysiology. World J Psychiatry. 2016;6(4):391–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Van Den Eede F, Van Hecke J, Van Dalfsen A, Van den Bossche B, Cosyns P, Sabbe BGC. The use of atypical antipsychotics in the treatment of catatonia. Eur Psychiat. 2005;20(5-6):422–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Graus F, Titulaer MJ, Balu R, Benseler S, Bien CG, Cellucci T, et al. A clinical approach to diagnosis of autoimmune encephalitis. Lancet Neurol. 2016;15(4):391–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Bush G, Fink M, Petrides G, Dowling F, Francis A. Catatonia: I. rating scale and standardized examination. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1996;93(2):129–36.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Wilson JE, Niu K, Nicolson SE, Levine SZ, Heckers S. The diagnostic criteria and structure of catatonia. Schizophr Res. 2015;164(1-3):256–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Zingela Z, Stroud L, Cronje J, Fink M, van Wyk S. Assessment of catatonia and inter-rater reliability of three instruments: a descriptive study. Int J Ment Heal Syst. 2021;15(1):8.

    Google Scholar 

  26. White DA. Catatonia and the neuroleptic malignant syndrome--a single entity? Br J Psychiatry. 1992;161:558–60.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Northoff G. Neuroleptic malignant syndrome and catatonia: one entity or two? Biol Psychiatry. 1996;40(5):431–3.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Koch M, Chandragiri S, Rizvi S, Petrides G, Francis A. Catatonic signs in neuroleptic malignant syndrome. Compr Psychiatry. 2000;41(1):73–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Vesperini S, Papetti F, Pringuey D. Are catatonia and neuroleptic malignant syndrome related conditions? Encephale. 2010;36(2):105–10.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Ghaziuddin N, Hendriks M, Patel P, Wachtel LE, Dhossche DM. Neuroleptic malignant syndrome/malignant catatonia in child psychiatry: literature review and a case series. J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol. 2017;27(4):359–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Cronemeyer M, Schonfeldt-Lecuona C, Gahr M, Keller F, Sartorius A. Malignant catatonia: severity, treatment and outcome - a systematic case series analysis. World J Biol Psychiatry. 2022;23(1):78–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Al-Diwani A, Handel A, Townsend L, Pollak T, Leite MI, Harrison PJ, et al. The psychopathology of NMDAR-antibody encephalitis in adults: a systematic review and phenotypic analysis of individual patient data. Lancet Psychiatry. 2019;6(3):235–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Lim JA, Lee ST, Moon J, Jun JS, Kim TJ, Shin YW, et al. Development of the clinical assessment scale in autoimmune encephalitis. Ann Neurol. 2019;85(3):352–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Lee ST, Lee HS, Lee WJ, Cha HA, Kim SH, Shin SY, et al. The safety and efficacy of intravenous immunoglobulin in autoimmune encephalitis. Ann Clin Transl Neurol. 2022;9(5):610–21.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Wang W, Zhang L, Chi XS, He L, Zhou D, Li JM. Psychiatric symptoms of patients with anti-NMDA receptor encephalitis. Front Neurol. 2020;10:8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Warren N, O'Gorman C, McKeon G, Swayne A, Blum S, Siskind D. Psychiatric management of anti-NMDAR encephalitis: a cohort analysis. Psychol Med. 2021;51(3):435–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Warren N, Siskind D, O'Gorman C. Refining the psychiatric syndrome of anti-N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor encephalitis. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2018;138(5):401–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Hinotsu K, Miyaji C, Yada Y, Kawai H, Sakamoto S, Okahisa Y, et al. The validity of atypical psychosis diagnostic criteria to detect anti-NMDA receptor encephalitis with psychiatric symptoms. Schizophr Res. 2022;248:292–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Kawai H, Takaki M, Sakamoto S, Shibata T, Tsuchida A, Yoshimura B, et al. Anti-NMDA-receptor antibody in initial diagnosis of mood disorder. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2019;29(9):1041–50.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Warren N, Grote V, O'Gorman C, Siskind D. Electroconvulsive therapy for anti-N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) receptor encephalitis: a systematic review of cases. Brain Stimul. 2019;12(2):329–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Lejuste F, Thomas L, Picard G, Desestret V, Ducray F, Rogemond V, et al. Neuroleptic intolerance in patients with anti-NMDAR encephalitis. Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflammation. 2016;3(5):7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Clinebell K, Azzam PN, Gopalan P, Haskett R. Guidelines for preventing common medical complications of catatonia: case report and literature review. J Clin Psychiatry. 2014;75(6):644–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Schieveld JNM, Strik JJMH, Van Kraaij S, Nicolai J. Psychiatric manifestations and psychopharmacology of autoimmune encephalitis: a multidisciplinary approach. In: Reus VI, Lindqvist D, editors. Psychopharmacology of neurologic disease. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2019. p. 285–307.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  44. Northoff G. Catatonia and neuroleptic malignant syndrome: psychopathology and pathophysiology. J Neural Transm (Vienna). 2002;109(12):1453–67.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Moskowitz AK. “Scared stiff”: catatonia as an evolutionary-based fear response. Psychol Rev. 2004;111(4):984–1002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Northoff G, Steinke R, Nagel Dczerwenka C, Grosser O, Danos P, Genz A, et al. Right lower prefronto-parietal cortical dysfunction in akinetic catatonia: a combined study of neuropsychology and regional cerebral blood flow. Psychol Med. 2000;30(3):583–96.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Cuevas-Esteban J, Iglesias-González M, Serra-Mestres J, Butjosa A, Canal-Rivero M, Serrano-Blanco A, et al. Catatonia in elderly psychiatric inpatients is not always associated with intense anxiety: factor analysis and correlation with psychopathology. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2020;35(11):1409–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to acknowledge all participants of this study and investigators for collecting data.

Funding

This research was supported by Hubei Technological Innovation Special Fund (CN) [Grant NO.2019ACA132] and The Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [Grant NO. 2019kfyXKJC075].

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Neurology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, 1095 Jiefang Avenue, Wuhan, 430030, Hubei, China

    Huiting Wu, Chunmei Wu, Yingying Zhou, Shanshan Huang & Suiqiang Zhu

Authors
  1. Huiting Wu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Chunmei Wu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Yingying Zhou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Shanshan Huang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Suiqiang Zhu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

SZ and SH led the study. HW performed the data analysis and implemented the methodology. HW, CW, and YZ collected the data. SH and HW were major contributors in writing the manuscript. SZ reviewed and edited the final manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Shanshan Huang or Suiqiang Zhu.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology (Approved No. of ethic committee: TJ-IRB20171108). The study was conducted according to the Helsinki Declaration, and all participants gave written informed consent. The anonymity of patients was preserved in the study.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial partnership that could be considered as a potential conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1: Supplementary Table S1.

Outcomes of patients assessed by mRS and CASE at follow-up.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wu, H., Wu, C., Zhou, Y. et al. Catatonia in adult anti-NMDAR encephalitis: an observational cohort study. BMC Psychiatry 23, 94 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-022-04505-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-022-04505-x

Keywords

BMC Psychiatry

ISSN: 1471-244X

Contact us