Skip to main content
Download PDF

Prognostic prediction of subjective cognitive decline in major depressive disorder based on immune biomarkers: a prospective observational study

BMC Psychiatry volume 23, Article number: 54 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Objective

Subjective cognitive decline (SCD) is highlighted in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD), which impairs objective cognitive performance and worsens the clinical outcomes. Immune dysregulation is supposed to be the potential mechanism of cognitive impairment. However, the peripheral immune biomarkers in patients troubled with MDD and SCD are not conventionally described.

Methods

A prospective-observational study was conducted for 8 weeks. Subjective cognitive function was measured using the Chinese version of the 20-item perceived deficits questionnaire-depression (PDQ-D) and depression symptoms were evaluated with Hamilton Depression Rating Scale-17 (HDRS-17). Luminex assays were used to measure 48 immune cytokines in plasma at baseline. Integrating these results and clinicopathological features, a logistic regression model was used to develop a prognostic prediction.

Results

Totally, 114 patients were enrolled in this study. Among the patients who completed follow-up, 56% (N = 50) had residual subjective cognitive decline, and 44% (N = 50) did not. The plasma levels of FGF basic, INF-γ, IL-1β, MCP-1, M-CSF and SCF were increased and the levels of IL-9, RANTES and PDGF-BB were decreased in the SCD group. Additionally, Basic FGF, IFN-γ, IL-1β, and SCF were positively correlated and IL-9, RANTES, and PDGF-BB were negatively correlated with the PDQ-D scores after treatment. Notably, combinations of cytokines (SCF and PDGF-BB) and PDQ-D scores at baseline showed good performance (The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve = 0.818) in the prediction of subjective cognitive decline.

Conclusion

A prognostic model based on protein concentrations of SCF, PDGF-BB, and scores of PDQ-D showed considerable accuracy in predicting residual subjective cognitive decline in depression.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a worldwide psychiatric condition associated with high recurrence rates and disability causes great financial losses [1]. The World Health Organization (WHO) reported that nearly 322 million people (estimated to be 4.4%) living with depression and the total rate increased by 18.4% between 2005 and 2015 [2]. While in China, MDD is the most prevalent mood disorder reported in 2019, and the lifetime prevalence and the 12-month prevalence of MDD are 3.4 and 2.1% respectively [3]. Despite the typical symptoms of MDD are depressed mood, diminished interests, and vegetative symptoms, accumulating evidence shows that cognitive impairment is one of the core symptoms of MDD [4, 5]. It is reported that cognitive problems persist 85–94% of the time during depressive episodes and 39–44% of the time during remissions [6]. And both in "The International Classification of Diseases-10" (ICD-10) and "The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-5" (DSM-5), cognitive dysfunction is defined as one of the diagnostic criteria [7]. The symptoms of cognitive impairment contain memory decline, executive dysfunction, and decision-making difficulties both subjectively and objectively reported [8]. Subjective cognitive decline (SCD) reported by patients themselves, called cognitive symptoms, is more prominently correlated with depressive symptoms and clinical outcomes than objective cognitive impairment that represents cognitive performance [9]. Specifically, approximately half of the objectively remitted patients are not in subjective remission, and residual subjective cognitive problems such as memory or concentration trouble in 70% of outpatients with MDD [10], which contributes to an underestimation of the cognitive function causing worsen performance on cognitive tests [11]. Furthermore, evidence hypothesis that subjective function can represent the pre-morbid cognitive function [12], hence, subjective cognitive decline has been pointed to be a significant factor that causes poor socio-occupational ability and productivity [13].

Numerous studies have confirmed that immune dysfunction plays a key role in the pathological process of mental diseases such as schizophrenia, Alzheimer's disease(AD), bipolar disorder, and major depressive disorder [14,15,16,17]. One of the hypotheses is that peripheral immune marker activation damages the blood–brain system (BBB) which causes neuroinflammation and then exacerbates the pathogenic processes of depression [18]. On the other hand, neuroinflammation directly affects the microstructure of the hippocampus, thereby reducing the brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) level and signaling, resulting in diminished dendritic arborization, and leading to cognitive dysfunction in patients with MDD [19]. Existing evidence shows that plasma levels of interleukin-1β (IL-1β), a pro-inflammatory cytokine, are negatively associated with overall cognitive function in MDD patients [20], and interleukin-1Ra (IL-1Ra) is negatively associated with visual cognition, memory, and executive function [21]. Both the tumor necrosis factors (TNF-α) and the soluble tumor necrosis factor receptor 1 (sTNF-R1) are negatively correlated with impaired verbal memory, and elevated expression of tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily member 1A (TNFRSF1A) and tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily member 1B (TNFRSF1B) are negatively correlated with cognitive performance including working memory, executive functions, attention, auditory-verbal memory, the effectiveness of learning processes, and verbal fluency [22]. Besides the pro-inflammatory cytokines, studies also prove that chemokines and growth factors participate in the mechanism of linking depression and cognitive impairment, such as interleukin-8 (IL-8) is positively correlated with verbal fluency and eosinophil chemotactic protein 2 (eotaxin-2) is positive with generation ability and letter memory task [23]. Another reflected in a meta-analysis, the level of insulin-like growth factor can represent the severity of depression symptoms and cognitive disturbance [24]. Those studies demonstrate that not only the pro-inflammatory cytokines but also the chemokines and growth factors play a significant role in patients suffering from depression and cognitive impairment.

So far, most of the existing studies focused on the objective cognitive function in patients with MDD, and substantial evidence confirmed immune dysfunction as a cause of impaired cognitive performance in depression. However, fewer study to examine the potential relation between immune markers and residual subjective cognitive problems. Furthermore, the existing studies gave more attention to the relationship between pro-inflammatory cytokines such as IL-1β, and TNF-α in patients with MDD, while the correlation between immune markers was more complex, including chemokines and growth factors. Therefore, we selected a multi-cytokine array for simultaneous analysis to understand the role of inflammation in subjective cognitive decline in depression. And prognostic prediction analysis provides a strategy to further characterize the relationship between immune cytokines and residual subjective cognitive problems. Thus, this study aimed to find a predictive model of subjective cognitive impairment targeting immune cytokines in patients with depression. Firstly, all patients were tested for multiple cytokines, and then potential correlations between clinical parameters of immune cytokines were analyzed. Finally, a logistic regression model including clinical questionary and plasma immune cytokines was applied to predict the subjective cognitive function in MDD. This study not only provides a comprehensive understanding of the relationship between inflammation-related cytokines and subjective cognitive symptoms but also identifies new markers that predict subjective cognitive function in MDD.

Methods

Subjects and study procedure

The study design and the recruiting procedure were described in Fig. 1. All patients were recruited from the outpatient of Shanghai Mental Health Center in China from 2019 to 2020. Primarily, a total of one hundred and forty-four outpatients with depressive symptoms and subjective cognitive decline were recommended to participate in the research. Of these patients, thirty patients receiving benzodiazepines or antipsychotics were excluded, and one hundred and fourteen patients were finally included in the follow-up. Eleven patients who changed the drug from SSRI to SNRI were excluded from the study. Three patients refused to provide blood samples and sixteen patients who had the physical disease after recruiting in the study were ruled out. Ultimately, thirty-four patients who refused to complete the whole follow-up were excluded and fifty patients (male/female = 11/39) were enrolled. Either Escitalopram(10 mg-20 mg) or Venlafaxine(80 mg-225 mg) was prescribed by the doctor depending on the patient’s condition for 8 weeks.

Fig. 1
figure 1

The study design and recruiting procedure. A total of 48 cytokines were selected for comparison between groups. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to measure the accuracy of the model. Abbreviation: SCD: subjective cognitive decline; NSCD: non-subjective cognitive decline

Full size image

All patients were required to meet the inclusion criteria:1) DSM-5 diagnosis criteria for depression and were assessed by an attending psychiatrist and above; 2) Han Chinese, aged 18–60 years; 3) was able to complete the entire inspection. 4) the score of Hamilton Depression Rating Scale-17 (HDRS-17) ≥ 17 and perceived deficits questionnaire-depression (PDQ-D) ≥ 21. 5) willing to participate. Exclusion criteria were: 1) pregnancy, lactation, or breastfeeding; 2) other mental illnesses, including schizophrenia, schizoaffective psychosis, bipolar disorder, substance abuse (alcohol/drugs); 3) major physical abnormalities like central nervous system disease, autoimmune disorders, acute infections, cancer.

Clinical measurement and data collection

The clinical demographic data were collected by using a clinical research data manual including age, gender, education, and other clinical information at baseline. Clinical questionnaire assessments were collected at baseline and 8-week follow-up.

The HDRS-17 [25] was used to assess patients’ depressive symptoms by two psychometricians who had received concurrent training. All the subjects were suffering moderate to severe depressive episodes based on the HDRS-17 scores.

Subjective cognitive function was examined by the 20-item Perceived Deficits Questionnaire-Depression (PDQ-D, Chinses Version) including three cognitive domains (planning/concentration PC, retrospective memory RM, prospective memory PM), yielding a possible score range of 0–80, and with higher scores reflecting more pronounced symptoms [26]. A total PDQ-D score ≥ 21 means patients who suffer subjective cognitive decline [27]. The patients were separated into two groups which were the subjective cognitive decline group(SCD)and the non-subjective cognitive decline group(NSCD)according to the PDQ-D scores at 8 weeks. Patients with a total score of PDQ-D ≥ 21 were divided into the SCD group, and PDQ-D < 21 were divided into the NSCD group.

Functional disability is reflected by the Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS), which ranges from 0 (unimpaired) to 30 (highly impaired) and consists of three items: work or school, social life, and family life.

Biochemical analysis

To explore the potential mechanism by which patients exist cognitive impairment, Luminex liquid suspension chip detection was performed to compare the differential expression of 48 cytokines including pro-inflammatory, chemokines, and growth factors (Supplementary Table 1).

All peripheral blood samples were collected between 8:00 to 12:00 by using anticoagulant tubes and the plasma was isolated by centrifugation (3000 rpm for 15 min at 4℃). The separated plasma was deposited at -80 ℃ until being used. According to the manufacturer's instructions using the Bio-Plex MagPix System, the plasma concentration of the 48 cytokines were simultaneously measured by the Bio-Plex Pro Human Cytokine Screening 48-Plex Panel (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA), and streamlined data were analyzed with the Bio-Plex Manager (Luminex, Austin, TX, USA), agented by Wayen Biotechnologies (Shanghai, China). The calculation of the concentration was based on the cytokine’s fluorescence values which resulted from the standard substance included in the 96-well plate. The concentration below or above the limit of the standard concentration could not be detected and treated as missing data. All the results are presented as picograms per milliliter.

Statistical analysis

The Kolmogorov–Smirnov one-sample test was used to test the normal distribution of all data at first. Demographic and clinical variables of two groups were compared by t-test for normal distribution and Mann–Whitney U test for non-normal distribution, and categorical variables were analyzed by Chi-square test. Correlations between cytokines and clinical characteristics were examined by Pearson’s correlation coefficients or Spearman’s rank correlation coefficients. A binary logistics regression was applied to value the effects of which inflammatory markers were significantly associated with subjective cognitive impairment. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), a parameter with a CI of 95%, was adopted to measure the accuracy of the model in predicting patients with or without subjective cognitive impairments. All statistical analyses and figures were carried out by using R software (Vienna, Austria, version 4.0.2). All P values were defined as a statistically significant set at 0.05.

Results

Clinical characteristics and subjective functional outcomes

The overall clinical characteristics of patients with MDD were shown in Table 1. There were twenty-nine female patients and eleven male patients with a mean age of 27.31 ± 7.21 years and a mean education level of 15.04 years. The baseline HRSD-17 score was 23.02 ± 4.77 and the average percentage of the reductive ratio was 58.75%. Twenty-eight patients with residual subjective cognitive decline were distributed into the SCD group and twenty-two patients into the NSCD group.

Table 1 The clinical characteristic of the total subjects enrolled
Full size table

Participants’ characteristics by group were reported in Table 2, and there were no significant differences in age, gender, education, height, weight, BMI, drinkers, smokers, duration of illness, and the age at disease onset between the two groups (all P > 0.05). The rate of HAMD reduction was greater than 50% in both groups but was significantly higher in the NSCD group than in the SCD group (P = 0.015). Patients in the SCD group were troubled with more subjective cognitive problems at baseline, and PDQ-D scores and three subitems differed significantly between the two groups (all P < 0.05). Excluding family life at baseline (P = 0.315), patients with residual subjective cognitive decline had reduced functional ability at baseline and 8-week, as reflected by the Sheen Disability Scale (all P < 0.05) (supplementary Table 2).

Table 2 The group analyses of the clinical characteristic according to assessment
Full size table

Comparison of immune cytokine protein levels

Cytokines including IFNa2, GM-CSF, IL-1ra, IL-2, IL-5, IL-6, IL-15, MIF, IL-12, and VEGF were excluded because the missing data for these cytokines were greater than 30%. As shown in Fig. 2, the protein concentrations of FGF basic, INF-γ, IL-1β, SCF, MCP-1, and M-CSF were increased in the SCD group, while IL-9, PDGF-BB, and RANTES were decreased (all P < 0.05). No difference was found in other cytokines (Supplementary Table 3).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Difference of the cytokines level between the NSCD and SCD group at baseline. Violin plots were used to visualize the distribution of numerical data and depicted summary statistics and the density of each variable. Abbreviation: pg/ml: picograms per milliliter; FGF basic: basic fibroblast factor; INF-γ: interferon gamma; IL-1β: interleukin-1 beta; SCF: stem cell factor; MCP-1: monocytechemoattractantprotein-1; M-CSF: macrophage colony-stimulating factor; IL-9: interleukin-9; PDGF-BB: platelet-derived growth factor BB; RANTES: regulated on activation, normal T cell expressed and secreted. *Significantly difference (p < 0.05)

Full size image

Correlations of peripheral immune cytokine with subjective cognitive function

Among the nine cytokines differed between the two groups, the PDQ-D scores at week 8 were positively correlated with the protein concentrations of FGF basic(R = 0.31; P = 0.031), IFN-γ(R = 0.3; P = 0.037), IL-1β(R = 0.29; P = 0.041), and SCF(R = 0.32; P = 0.025), and negatively associated with the levels of IL-9(R = -0.32; P = 0.023), RANTES(R = -0.31; P = 0.027), and PDGF-BB(R = -0.38; P = 0.0071) (Fig. 3). For further analysis, no correlation was observed between protein concentrations of the nine cytokines and baseline PDQ-D scores (Supplementary Fig. 1). In addition, the correlations between the nine cytokines and the PDQ-D subitems and SDS subitems were shown in Supplementary Fig. 2.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Relationship between cytokines at baseline and the PDQ-D scores at week 8. Abbreviation: FGF basic: basic fibroblast factor; INF-γ: interferon gamma; IL-1β: interleukin-1 beta; SCF: stem cell factor; MCP-1: monocytechemoattractantprotein-1; M-CSF: macrophage colony-stimulating factor; IL-9: interleukin-9; PDGF-BB: platelet-derived growth factor BB; RANTES: regulated on activation, normal T cell expressed and secreted. Perceived PDQ-D: perceived deficits questionnaire-depression

Full size image

Predictive model for the decline in subjective cognitive function

The results of the ROC analysis assessing cytokine concentrations to predict residual subjective cognitive function were shown in Fig. 4. The levels of SCF and PDGF-BB showed significant value for predicting subjective cognitive decline, with an AUROC of 0.7 (95%CI = 0.933–0.993) and 0.678 (95%CI = 1.000–1.009). Furthermore, the severity of subjective cognitive function at baseline had a significant effect on cognitive prognosis. Scores of PDQ-D at baseline and levels of SCF and PDGF-BB combination showed a predictive value of AUROC of 0.818(CI = 0.701–0.935).

Fig. 4
figure 4

Prognostic prediction of residual subjective cognitive decline. A ROC curves for PDQ-D scores at baseline; B ROC curves for SCF level at baseline; C ROC curves for PDGF-BB level at baseline; D ROC curves for the combination (PDQ-D scores + SCF + PDGF-BB) at baseline to predict the subjective cognitive function. Abbreviation: area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC)

Full size image

Discussion

The prominent finding of this study was that peripheral immune cytokines were associated with the residual subjective cognitive function in MDD after 8 weeks of treatment, independent of pre-treatment subjective cognitive function. This finding demonstrated that SCF and PDGF-BB and the combination of the two growth factors with PDQ-D scores at baseline could predict the subjective cognitive function after treatment in MDD. These results robustly implicated the relationship between immune dysregulation and residual subjective cognitive function in depression.

The first finding of this study suggests that subjective cognitive problems troubled both symptomatic and remitted depressed patients. These results were consistent with previous studies that demonstrated cognitive problems are key clinical factors of functional disability [28, 29]. One hypothesis is that the decrease in self-evaluation and the increase in self-doubt and negative self-evaluation are the main reasons why patients are more sensitive to the subtle deterioration in cognitive function and underestimate their cognitive ability [30]. In addition, the observed subjective cognitive decline is associated with greater socio-occupational difficulties and functional disabilities [31, 32], which was shown in this study reflected by SDS scores. Interestingly, both the recurring depressive episodes and the longer duration of illness can deteriorate the subjective cognitive function [32], but no significant difference was found in this study.

The second finding of this study was that depressed patients with residual subjective cognitive decline had differences in immune cytokines prior to treatment. It should be noted that the results were partially consistent with previous studies focusing on objective cognitive function and increased plasma inflammatory biomarkers IL-1β [33, 34] and MCP-1 [35]. And another machine learning analysis shows that plasma SCF contributes significantly to differentiate cognitive impairment in patients with late-life depression [36], which is also consistent with the results of this study. Furthermore, this study found that PDGF-BB decreased in patients with SCD, which was consistent with previous studies on mild cognitive impairment, but inconsistent with studies on AD [37]. The reason for this discrepancy may be that MCI patients predominantly report subjective cognitive symptoms, whereas AD occupies more objective cognitive symptoms. In contrast to the previous study focusing on depressive symptoms, the present study found a significant increase in IFN-γ levels and a significant decrease in IL-9 levels in the SCD group with more severe depressive symptoms [38, 39]. Differences in the clinical characteristics of patients selected for enrollment in those studies explain the inconsistent results. In addition, it has been reported that hippocampal FGF basic mRNA density is reduced in the postmortem brain of individuals suffering from major depressive disorder [40]. While in this study, we found that the peripheral levels of FGF basic were increased in the SCD group which implied the different mechanisms underline the peripheral and central immune systems.

The third finding of this study was that FGF basic, IFN-γ, IL-1β, and SCF were negatively associated with residual subjective cognitive function, whereas IL-9, PDGF-BB, and RANTES were positively associated with residual subjective cognitive function. Firstly, the results indicated a strong link between subjective cognitive problems and abnormalities in immune mechanisms involving chronic adaptive immunity. In the preclinical study, increased IL-1β has adverse effects on memory and cognitive function and negatively influences the proliferation, differentiation, and survival of hippocampal NPCs in both juvenile and adult animal models [41]. Particularly, IL-1β produced by microglia also promotes the Th-1 responses to produce IFN-γ, which inhibits IL-9 secretion and promotes neuroinflammation [42]. These correlations between IL-1β, IFN-γ, and IL-9 explain the negative association of IFN-γ and IL-1β with subjective cognitive function and the positive association of IL-9 with subjective cognitive function in this study. Furthermore, IL-1β interacts with RANTES and registers an important role in brain pathology [43], but a previous study found no correlation between RANTES and objective cognitive function [44]. In this study, a positive correlation was observed between RANTES and subjective cognitive function, and the mechanism of this correlation needs further investigation. Secondly, evidence strongly suggested that another mechanism was related to the BBB, which connected the peripheral and central immune systems. PDGF-BB, targeting the PGDFRβ + pericytes [45], cooperates with FGF basic in maintaining the integrity and stabilization of BBB, enhancing the function of endothelial cells and the compactness of the cells [46]. The imbalance between those two cytokines could deteriorate the BBB completion and accelerate the other pro-inflammatory cytokines cross the BBB.

The fourth finding of this study was that SCF and PDGF-BB predicted residual subjective cognitive function in depressed patients, respectively. The mechanism was point to the interaction between different neuroprotectors. SCF is a neurotrophic factor which contributes to neuroprotective and immune effects that are involved in the process of remission/recovery from depression [47]. SCF can down regulate microglial expression of the inflammation-associated cytokines, such as IL-1β and enhance microglial expression of the mRNAs of nerve growth factor (NGF) and BDNF. PDGF-BB has been reported to protect the neurons from oxidative insults and energy deprivation by upregulating the PDGFR-β signaling, targeting the NR2B receptors and the PI3K/AKT pathway [48]. Moreover, the exogenous administration of PDGF-BB has been demonstrated to prevent glutamate-induced hippocampal neuronal injury and death [49]. Besides those studies, evidence also prove that the protection function of serotonin receptor agonist treatment to the NMDA-induced cell death was mediated through increased expression of PDGFR-β in primary hippocampal neurons [49]. But until to now, the interaction between SCF and PDGF-BB in subjective cognitive decline in MDD is still unclear and requires further study.

Notably, the findings also suggest that the combination of clinical markers and peripheral immune cytokines was more accurate and effective in predicting residual subjective cognitive decline in depressed patients. Interestingly, no correlations were found in the baseline PDQ-D scores and immune cytokines. Whether these results are related to medication use requires further study. In clinical, PDQ-D is convenient for doctors to evaluate the patient's subjective cognitive symptoms, while some patients exaggerate or conceal their symptoms, resulting in inaccurate measurements. However, objective biomarkers, which avoid subjective influences, can help clinicians predict residual subjective function and develop new interventions in the early stages of patient treatment. To our surprise, the findings highlight the role of growth factors as immune markers in subjective cognitive impairment in depression, and the involvement in neuroinflammation and peripheral immunity in depression deserves further attention. Next work needs to expand the sample size and follow-up time to further investigate the accuracy of the model.

Several limitations need to be highlighted in this study. First, we used a self-reported cognitive assessment questionnaire to assess subjective cognitive decline in patients with depression. Although the reliability and validity of the PDQ-D have been studied in Chinese, the shortcoming of this questionnaire is that it cannot represent the whole field of cognitive function. In addition, we did not measure objective cognitive function in this study, which covers a major part of cognitive function, and the absence of this part is one of the important flaws of the article. Second, because the sample/assay fluid is in a well, cytokines drawn into multiple screening plates have potential interactions with other antibodies. And multiplex testing techniques may underestimate the levels of some cytokines. All these reasons could affect our results. Third, only 50 patients in our study completed a complete follow-up, a number too small to be statistically biased. Our study is prospective with small sample size, and further research needs to be carried out in a larger sample size.

Conclusion

In conclusion, depressed patients with residual cognitive impairment had alterations in their pretreatment pro-inflammatory cytokines, chemokines, and growth factors, suggesting an overall change in the inflammatory network. The clinical questionary combined with immune markers(SCF and PDGF-BB) efficiently predicts subjective cognitive decline after treatment. For patients with subjective cognitive decline, clinicians can explore new therapeutic directions by focusing on whether such patients have abnormal levels of immune inflammation. Also, a predictive method combining inflammatory factors and clinical indicators can expand clinical ideas for identifying new diagnostic and therapeutic approaches.

Availability of data and materials

The original data can be acquired by connecting to the corresponding author.

References

  1. Malhi GS, Mann JJ. Depression. Lancet. 2018;392:2299–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. World Health Organization. Depression and other common mental disorders: global health estimates. WHO/MSD/MER. 2017.2.

  3. Lu J, Xu X, Huang Y, Li T, Ma C, Xu G, et al. Prevalence of depressive disorders and treatment in China: a cross-sectional epidemiological study. Lancet Psychiatry. 2021;8:981–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Wang Y, Wang G, Zhang N, Huang J, Wu W, Jia F, et al. Association between residual symptoms and social functioning in patients with depression. Compr Psychiatry. 2020;98: 152164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Otte C, Gold SM, Penninx BW, Pariante CM, Etkin A, Fava M, et al. Major depressive disorder. Nat Rev Dis Primer. 2016;2:16065.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Perini G, Cotta Ramusino M, Sinforiani E, Bernini S, Petrachi R, Costa A. Cognitive impairment in depression: recent advances and novel treatments. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2019;15:1249–58.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Battle DE. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM). CoDAS. 2013;25:191–2.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Maor Y, Olmer L, Mozes B. The relation between objective and subjective impairment in cognitive function among multiple sclerosis patients–the role of depression. Mult Scler Houndmills Basingstoke Engl. 2001;7:131–5.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Srisurapanont M, Suttajit S, Eurviriyanukul K, Varnado P. Discrepancy between objective and subjective cognition in adults with major depressive disorder. Sci Rep. 2017;7:3901.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Srisurapanont M, Bautista D, Chen CH, Wang G, Udomratn P, Eurviriyanukul K. Subjective memory and concentration deficits in medication-free, non-elderly Asians with major depressive disorder: prevalence and their correlates. J Affect Disord. 2015;171:105–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. McIntyre RS, Xiao HX, Syeda K, Vinberg M, Carvalho AF, Mansur RB, et al. The prevalence, measurement, and treatment of the cognitive dimension/domain in major depressive disorder. CNS Drugs. 2015;29:577–89.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Friedman NP, du Pont A, Corley RP, Hewitt JK. Longitudinal relations between depressive symptoms and executive functions from adolescence to early adulthood: a twin study. Clin Psychol Sci J Assoc Psychol Sci. 2018;6:543–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kim JM, Chalem Y, di Nicola S, Hong JP, Won SH, Milea D. A cross-sectional study of functional disabilities and perceived cognitive dysfunction in patients with major depressive disorder in South Korea: The PERFORM-K study. Psychiatry Res. 2016;239:353–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Zhang H, Ding L, Shen T, Peng D. HMGB1 involved in stress-induced depression and its neuroinflammatory priming role: a systematic review. Gen Psychiatry. 2019;32: e100084.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Pape K, Tamouza R, Leboyer M, Zipp F. Immunoneuropsychiatry - novel perspectives on brain disorders. Nat Rev Neurol. 2019;15:317–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Chung W-S, Welsh CA, Barres BA, Stevens B. Do glia drive synaptic and cognitive impairment in disease? Nat Neurosci. 2015;18:1539–45.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Birdsall JW, Schmitz SL, Abosi OJ, DuBose LE, Pierce GL, Fiedorowicz JG. Inflammatory and vascular correlates of mood change over 8 weeks. Heart Mind Mumbai India. 2019;3:47–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Werf YDVD, Jongste MJLD, Horst GJT. The immune system mediates blood-brain barrier damage; possible implications for pathophysiology of neuropsychiatric illnesses. Acta Neuropsychiatr. 1995;7:114–21.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Calabrese F, Rossetti AC, Racagni G, Gass P, Riva MA, Molteni R. Brain-derived neurotrophic factor: a bridge between inflammation and neuroplasticity. Front Cell Neurosci. 2014;8:430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Howren MB, Lamkin DM, Suls J. Associations of depression with C-reactive protein, IL-1, and IL-6: a meta-analysis. Psychosom Med. 2009;71:171–86.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Lotrich FE, Butters MA, Aizenstein H, Marron MM, Reynolds CF, Gildengers AG. The relationship between interleukin-1 receptor antagonist and cognitive function in older adults with bipolar disorder. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2014;29:635–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Zazula R, Dodd S, Dean OM, Berk M, Bortolasci CC, Verri WA, et al. Cognition-immune interactions between executive function and working memory, tumour necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) and soluble TNF receptors (sTNFR1 and sTNFR2) in bipolar disorder. World J Biol Psychiatry Off J World Fed Soc Biol Psychiatry. 2022;23:67–77.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Asevedo E, Gadelha A, Noto C, Mansur RB, Zugman A, Belangero SIN, et al. Impact of peripheral levels of chemokines, BDNF and oxidative markers on cognition in individuals with schizophrenia. J Psychiatr Res. 2013;47:1376–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Levada OA, Troyan AS. Insulin-like growth factor-1: a possible marker for emotional and cognitive disturbances, and treatment effectiveness in major depressive disorder. Ann Gen Psychiatry. 2017;16:38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Hamilton M. A rating scale for depression. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1960;23:56–62.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Shi C, Wang G, Tian F, Han X, Sha S, Xing X, et al. Reliability and validity of Chinese version of perceived deficits questionnaire for depression in patients with MDD. Psychiatry Res. 2017;252:319–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Wang G, Si T-M, Li L, Fang Y, Wang C-X, Wang L-N, et al. Cognitive symptoms in major depressive disorder: associations with clinical and functional outcomes in a 6-month, non-interventional, prospective study in China. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2019;15:1723–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Petersen JZ, Porter RJ, Miskowiak KW. Clinical characteristics associated with the discrepancy between subjective and objective cognitive impairment in depression. J Affect Disord. 2019;246:763–74.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Conradi HJ, Ormel J, de Jonge P. Presence of individual (residual) symptoms during depressive episodes and periods of remission: a 3-year prospective study. Psychol Med. 2011;41:1165–74.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Svendsen AM, Kessing LV, Munkholm K, Vinberg M, Miskowiak KW. Is there an association between subjective and objective measures of cognitive function in patients with affective disorders? Nord J Psychiatry. 2012;66:248–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Rnic K, Jung Y-E, Torres I, Chakrabarty T, LeMoult J, Vaccarino AL, et al. Association between discrepancy in objective and subjective cognitive abilities and treatment response in patients with major depressive disorder: a CAN-BIND-1 study report. J Affect Disord. 2021;295:1095–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Miskowiak KW, Petersen JZ, Ott CV, Knorr U, Kessing LV, Gallagher P, et al. Predictors of the discrepancy between objective and subjective cognition in bipolar disorder: a novel methodology. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2016;134:511–21.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Jin K, Lu J, Yu Z, Shen Z, Li H, Mou T, et al. Linking peripheral IL-6, IL-1β and hypocretin-1 with cognitive impairment from major depression. J Affect Disord. 2020;277:204–11.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Das R, Emon MPZ, Shahriar M, Nahar Z, Islam SMA, Bhuiyan MA, et al. Higher levels of serum IL-1β and TNF-α are associated with an increased probability of major depressive disorder. Psychiatry Res. 2021;295: 113568.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Nordengen K, Kirsebom B-E, Henjum K, Selnes P, Gísladóttir B, Wettergreen M, et al. Glial activation and inflammation along the Alzheimer’s disease continuum. J Neuroinflammation. 2019;16:46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Diniz BS, Sibille E, Ding Y, Tseng G, Aizenstein HJ, Lotrich F, et al. Plasma biosignature and brain pathology related to persistent cognitive impairment in late-life depression. Mol Psychiatry. 2015;20:594–601.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Barroeta-Espar I, Weinstock LD, Perez-Nievas BG, Meltzer AC, Siao Tick Chong M, Amaral AC, et al. Distinct cytokine profiles in human brains resilient to Alzheimer’s pathology. Neurobiol Dis. 2019;121:327–37.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Leff Gelman P, Mancilla-Herrera I, Flores-Ramos M, Saravia Takashima MF, Cruz Coronel FM, Cruz Fuentes C, et al. The cytokine profile of women with severe anxiety and depression during pregnancy. BMC Psychiatry. 2019;19:104.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Myint A-M, Leonard BE, Steinbusch HWM, Kim Y-K. Th1, Th2, and Th3 cytokine alterations in major depression. J Affect Disord. 2005;88:167–73.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Deng Z, Deng S, Zhang MR, Tang MM. Fibroblast growth factors in depression. Front Pharmacol. 2019;10:60.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Feng Y-S, Tan Z-X, Wu L-Y, Dong F, Zhang F. The involvement of NLRP3 inflammasome in the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease. Ageing Res Rev. 2020;64: 101192.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Schmitt E, Klein M, Bopp T. Th9 cells, new players in adaptive immunity. Trends Immunol. 2014;35:61–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Marques RE, Guabiraba R, Russo RC, Teixeira MM. Targeting CCL5 in inflammation. Expert Opin Ther Targets. 2013;17:1439–60.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Bauer O, Milenkovic VM, Hilbert S, Sarubin N, Weigl J, Bahr L-M, et al. Association of Chemokine (C-C Motif) Receptor 5 and Ligand 5 with recovery from major depressive disorder and related neurocognitive impairment. NeuroImmunoModulation. 2020;27:152–62.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Sil S, Periyasamy P, Thangaraj A, Chivero ET, Buch S. PDGF/PDGFR axis in the neural systems. Mol Asp Med. 2018;62:63–74.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Nakamura K, Arimura K, Nishimura A, Tachibana M, Yoshikawa Y, Makihara N, et al. Possible involvement of basic FGF in the upregulation of PDGFRβ in pericytes after ischemic stroke. Brain Res. 2016;1630:98–108.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Benedetti F, Poletti S, Hoogenboezem TA, Locatelli C, Ambrée O, de Wit H, et al. Stem Cell Factor (SCF) is a putative biomarker of antidepressant response. J Neuroimmune Pharmacol. 2016;11:248–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Chen H, Teng Y, Chen X, Liu Z, Geng F, Liu Y, et al. Platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF)-BB protects dopaminergic neurons via activation of Akt/ERK/CREB pathways to upregulate tyrosine hydroxylase. CNS Neurosci Ther. 2021;27:1300–12.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Tseng HC, Dichter MA. Platelet-derived growth factor-BB pretreatment attenuates excitotoxic death in cultured hippocampal neurons. Neurobiol Dis. 2005;19:77–83.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the patients who participated in this trial and the clinicians for their hard work and significant contribution.

Funding

The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: Shanghai "Science and Technology Innovation Action Plan" medical innovation research (21Y11905600); Shanghai "Science and Technology Innovation Action Plan" Natural Science Foundation of Shanghai (21ZR1455100); Shanghai Municipal Health Bureau (No. 201740115); National Key R&D Program of China (No. 2016YFC0906300); National Natural Science Foundation of China(81701344); Shanghai Mental Health Center General Projects (2021-YJ-02).

Author information

Author notes

  1. Meiti Wang and Zheyi Wei contributed equally to this work.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Shanghai Mental Health Center, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200030, China

    Meiti Wang, Zheyi Wei, Qinte Huang, Weijie Yang, Dongbin Lyu, Fan Wang, Ni Zhou, Haijing Huang, Mengke Zhang, Yiming Chen, Yi Xu, Weiliang Ma, Zheng Chen & Wu Hong

  2. Shanghai Pudong New Area Mental Health Center, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, 200120, China

    Chenglin Wu

  3. Shanghai Huangpu District Mental Health Center, Shanghai, 200040, China

    Tongdan Cao & Jie Zhao

  4. Shanghai Key Laboratory of Psychotic Disorders, Shanghai, 201108, China

    Wu Hong

Authors
  1. Meiti Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Zheyi Wei
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Qinte Huang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Weijie Yang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Chenglin Wu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Tongdan Cao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Jie Zhao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Dongbin Lyu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Fan Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Ni Zhou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Haijing Huang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Mengke Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Yiming Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  14. Yi Xu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  15. Weiliang Ma
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  16. Zheng Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  17. Wu Hong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Wu Hong is responsible for the study concept and design. Zheyi Wei, Qinte Huang, Dongbin Lyu, Weijie Yang, Chenglin Wu, Ni Zhou, Dongbin Lyu, Haijing Huang, Weiliang Ma, Zheng Chen are responsible for patient enrollment and follow-up. Tongdan Cao, Jie Zhao, Mengke Zhang, and Fan Wang conduct the data collection and database creation. Yiming Chen and Yi Xu are responsible for the data review. Meiti Wang conducted the data analysis and wrote the first draft of the manuscript, and all authors contributed to and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wu Hong.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Before this study was started, all the subjects had signed permission and informed consent, and the study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of Shanghai Mental Health Center, China. All procedures performed in this study were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1:

 Supplementary table 1. The 48 cytokines tested included pro-inflammatory cytokines, chemokines, and growth factors. ABB: abbreviation. Supplementary table 2. Functional ability between the SCD group and NSCD group. Supplementary table 3. Difference of the cytokines level between the NSCD and SCD group at baseline. Supplementary figure 1. Correlation of the cytokines level and PDQ-D scores at baseline. Supplementary figure 2. Relationship between cytokines at baseline and the PDQ-D subtests (A), SDS scores and subtests (B) both at baseline and after 8 weeks treatment. 

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, M., Wei, Z., Huang, Q. et al. Prognostic prediction of subjective cognitive decline in major depressive disorder based on immune biomarkers: a prospective observational study. BMC Psychiatry 23, 54 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-022-04513-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-022-04513-x

Keywords

  • Major depressive disorder
  • Subjective cognitive decline
  • Immune biomarkers
  • Predictive model

BMC Psychiatry

ISSN: 1471-244X

Contact us