Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Cardiovascular risk assessment in patients with a severe mental illness: a systematic review and meta-analysis

  • Quintí Foguet-Boreu1, 2Email author,
  • Maria Isabel Fernandez San Martin3, 1,
  • Gemma Flores Mateo1,
  • Edurne Zabaleta del Olmo1, 4,
  • Luís Ayerbe García-Morzon5, 6,
  • Maria Perez-Piñar López5,
  • Luis Miguel Martin-López7,
  • Javier Montes Hidalgo8 and
  • Concepción Violán1
BMC PsychiatryBMC series – open, inclusive and trusted201616:141

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-016-0833-6

Received: 29 June 2015

Accepted: 25 April 2016

Published: 12 May 2016

Abstract

Background

Cardiovascular risk (CVR) has been observed to be higher in patients with severe mental illness (SMI) than in the general population. However, some studies suggest that CVR is not equally increased in different subgroups of SMI. The purposes of this review are to summarise CVR scores of SMI patients and to determine the differences in CVR between patients with different SMIs and between SMI patients and the control-population.

Methods

MEDLINE (via PubMed) was searched for literature published through August 28, 2014, followed by a snowball search in the Web of Science. Observational and experimental studies that reported CVR assessments in SMI patients using validated tools were included. The risk of bias was reported using STROBE and CONSORT criteria. Pooled continuous data were expressed as standardized mean differences (SMD) with 95 % confidence intervals (CI). Two reviewers independently selected studies, extracted data and assessed methodological quality.

Results

A total of 3,608 articles were identified, of which 67 full text papers were assessed for eligibility and 35 were finally included in our review, in which 12,179 psychiatric patients and 225,951 comparative patients had been assessed. The most frequent diagnoses were schizophrenia and related diagnoses (45.7 %), depressive disorders (14.7 %), SMI (11.4 %) and bipolar disorders (8.6 %). The most frequent CVR assessment tool used was the Framingham risk score. Subgroups analysis showed a higher CVR in schizophrenia than in depressive disorder or in studies that included patients with multiple psychiatric diagnoses (SMD: 0.63, 0.03, and 0.02, respectively).

Six studies were included in the meta-analysis. Total overall CVR did not differ between SMI patients and controls (SMD: 0.35 [95 % CI:−0.02 to 0.71], p = 0.06); high heterogeneity was observed (I 2 = 93 %; p < 0.001).

Conclusions

The summary of results from studies that assessed CVR using validated tools in SMI patients did not find sufficient data (except for limited evidence associated with schizophrenia) to permit any clear conclusions about increased CVR in this group of patients compared to the general population.

The systematic review is registered in PROSPERO: CRD42013003898.

Keywords

Cardiovascular risk Severe mental illness Depressive disorder Bipolar disorder Schizophrenia Systematic review

Background

Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of overall mortality, accounting for 24 % of deaths worldwide, while psychiatric diseases, led by major depressive disorder, are considered the eleventh most burdensome disease globally, with an increasing effect on overall mortality [1, 2].

Criteria for the definition of severe mental illness (SMI) differ, with some authors applying a narrow definition based on psychosis [3] and others also including a set of nosological entities of different types and clinical symptoms but with several common diagnostic criteria: severity, persistence over time (2 years or more), and a tendency toward clinical deterioration and difficulties in social and occupational function [4, 5].

It has been reported that cardiovascular risk (CVR) is higher in patients with SMI [6]. Studies in patients with bipolar disorder and schizophrenia indicate that they have a higher CVR than in the general population [7]. In patients with schizophrenia, the most prevalent CVR factors are hyperlipidaemia (61 %), smoking (55 %), obesity (41 %), diabetes (19 %) and hypertension (17 %)) [8]. Risk of metabolic syndrome is also higher among patients with schizophrenia and bipolar disorder [9]. Moreover, patients with anxiety and major depression have higher prevalence of hypertension compared to groups of similar age from the general population [10, 11].

Several factors may contribute to this raised CVR among patients with SMI, including unhealthy behaviours, difficulties in communication, barriers to medical care, poor treatment adherence and social deprivation [12]. Patients with SMI often receive fragmented medical care and fewer preventive measures, which leads to higher levels of underdiagnosis and lower rates of disease control [13]. Furthermore, antipsychotic drugs, antidepressants, and mood-stabilizing drugs have deleterious side effects, including important cardiometabolic consequences [1416].

However, to date no systematic analysis has investigated whether CVR is increased equally in all patients with SMI, making it difficult to design and implement effective, feasible, evidence-based interventions for CVR management in these patients. A summary of the observations about CVR in the different subgroups of patients with SMI would provide a better epidemiological description of the problem, inform more effective clinical and preventive strategies and help in the design of further studies.

The major aim of this review was to summarize the available evidence of CVR scores in patients with SMI. Furthermore, this review attempted to determine whether CVR differs between subgroups of SMI patients and compare the CVR between patients with SMI and the general or non-psychiatric population.

Methods

The Meta-analysis Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) criteria were used to undertake this review and meta-analysis [17], together with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) [18]. We conducted a systematic review of studies that reported CVR in patients with SMI.

Eligibility criteria

We included studies that reported CVR scores in patients with SMI. The following 10 diagnoses were included in the search strategy (Table 1): schizophrenic disorders, schizotypal disorders, persistent delirious disorders, induced delirious disorders, schizoaffective disorders, other non-organic psychotic disorders, bipolar disorder, serious depressive episode with psychotic symptoms, recurrent serious depressive disorders, and compulsive obsessive disorder [5].
Table 1

Search strategies for the electronic databases (data retrieved August 28, 2014)

Database

Search Strategy

References

PubMed

("Psychotic Disorders"[Mesh] OR "Bipolar Disorder"[Mesh] OR "Schizophrenia"[Mesh] OR psychotic OR psychosis OR psychoses OR schizo* OR bipolar OR manic OR mania OR delirious OR depress* OR obsessive-compulsive OR "obsessive compulsive" OR “compulsive obsessive” OR OCD OR agoraphob* OR panic OR phobia OR phobic OR melanchol* OR neurosis OR neurotic OR neuroses OR conversion disorder* OR “Mental Disorders” OR “severe mental”) AND (cardiovascular OR “Cardiovascular diseases” OR CVD) AND (risk score* OR risk chart* OR “risk prediction” OR risk check* OR “risk assessment” OR “risk evaluation” OR “risk calculator” OR risk-estimation OR “risk estimation” OR "year risk" OR “year CVD risk” OR Framingham OR “SCORE risk” OR SCORE chart* OR SCORE table*OR “Systematic Coronary Risk Evaluation” OR “REGICOR” OR “REGICOR table”* OR ASSIGN OR QRISK OR PROCAM OR WHO/ISH)

653

Web of Science

Snowballing: references cited in the eligible papers (forward), and references citing the eligible papers (backward)

2,955

We included observational and experimental studies that applied validated CVR tools, including Framingham risk score (FRS) with its subtypes of scores (cardiovascular disease (CVD), cardiovascular heart disease (CHD), Myocardial infarction (MI) and the Systematic Coronary Risk Evaluation (SCORE). If the studies reported data on other CVR scores not described above, these were also included.

We excluded articles that were based on first episodes of SMI, different reports from the same population (selecting the study with the most recent publication date or the largest sample size), papers reporting diagnoses based on symptoms, and studies referring to one or two psychotropic drugs.

Search strategy

We conducted a systematic search in PubMed using a combination of MESH and free text terms (Table 1). We searched from inception to the August 28, 2014. Based on the articles selected, we performed a snowball search in the Web of Science. We reviewed all the references (backward search) and the articles that cited the included papers (forward search). In addition, we added articles that were identified during the implementation of the review (hand searching). There were no language restrictions.

Study selection

Two researchers (CVF and QFB) reviewed the titles and abstracts of all studies identified in the initial search and defined a list of full text articles to be assessed. Cases of discordance were resolved by consensus; when necessary, the full-text article was reviewed. We conducted a pilot test of the eligibility criteria on a sample of 15 articles. We used this test to clarify these criteria and ensure that they were applied consistently by all reviewers.

Primary outcome was the CVR assessed with any validated CVR tool.

Data collection

We used a standardized data-collection form to record author and publication year, study design, country, setting, diagnosis, diagnostic criteria, number of participants and age in the psychiatric group and the comparative group (if applicable) and the objective of the study.

To assess the methodological quality of the studies, we used the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology Statement (STROBE) checklist for observational studies, with a maximum possible score of 24 [19], and the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) for randomized trials, with a maximum possible score of 37 [20], giving one point for each item the article addressed.

Two reviewers assessed methodological quality and extracted the data independently. Discrepancies were resolved by consensus between the two reviewers (CVV and QFB) and by discussion with a third reviewer (MFS) as needed. Inter-rater agreement was 96 %.

Statistical analysis

We analysed outcomes using Review Manager (RevMan, version 5.3). Pooled continuous data were expressed as standardized mean differences (SMD) with 95 % confidence intervals (CI). The effect size (ES) was categorized as small (<0.2), small to moderate (0.2–0.5), moderate to large (0.51–0.79), large (>0.79). Pooled SMD were estimated by using an inverse-variance-weighted random-effects model. Heterogeneity was quantified with the I2 statistic, which describes the proportion of the total between-study variability due to heterogeneity [21]. We used subgroup analysis to evaluate whether results differed according to the diagnosis (depressive disorder, schizophrenia vs psychiatric diagnoses), diagnosis criteria (non-specific (NE) vs DSM IV), study design (observational vs randomized control trial); and outcome (cardiovascular disease, coronary heart disease, stroke)

We assessed publication bias by using funnel plots. In sensitivity analysis, we assessed the relative influence of each study on the pooled estimate by omitting one study at time.

Protocol and registration

The initial protocol of the review was submitted to the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO, http://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/). The definitive protocol included the modifications suggested by the PROSPERO reviewers. The registration number of systematic review is: CRD42013003898.

Results

The electronic and manual searches retrieved 3,608 articles, of which 67 full-text papers were assessed for eligibility and 35 studies were finally included in our review (Fig. 1), representing a total of 12,179 psychiatric patients and 225,951 controls. Sample size of psychiatric study groups ranged from 36 [22] to 1,942 [23] participants. Of the 35 studies, 19 studies in Eurasia (16 in Europe) and 16 studies were conducted in the Americas. The most common design was cross-sectional (22 studies); 8 studies were randomized controlled trials (RCT) and only 5 were case-control studies (Table 2). A 45.7 % of the studies were performed in secondary services exclusively and 31.4 % in the hospital setting. The most frequent diagnoses were schizophrenia and related diagnoses (45.7 %), depressive disorders (14.3 %), and bipolar disorders (8.6 %). Seven studies (20.0 %) included different psychiatric diagnoses and only 4 (11.4 %) showed data on SMI as a whole (Table 1).
Fig. 1

Flow diagram of article review process

Table 2

Characteristics of the studies included in the review

Author, year

Study design

Country

Setting

Diagnosis

Diagnostic criteria

Psychiatric Group

Comparative Group

 

Number

Age [mean(SD)]

FRS [mean (SD)]

SCORE [mean (SD)]

Number

Age [mean(SD)]

FRS [mean (SD)]

        

CVD

Stroke

CHD

   

CVD

Stroke

CHD

Acharya T, 2013 [43]

Retrospective cross-sectional

USA

Hospital

Depressive disorder

Not reported

1.136

60.1 (3.0)

  

By drug

 

472

61,4 (11.9)

  

17.1 (5.7)

Allan CL, 2011 [22]

Cross-sectional

UK

Primary & secondary care services

Depressive disorder

DSM IV

36

71.8 (7.7)

 

10.3 (7.6)

  

25

71.8 (7.3)

 

10.1 (7.7)

 

Arango C, 2008 [44]

Cross-sectional

Spain

Secondary services

Schizophrenia & related disorders

DSM IV

1.452

40.7 (12.2)

  

6.8 (6.9)

0.9 (1.9)

     

Bernardo M, 2009 [45]

Cross-sectional

Spain

Psychiatric hospital

Schizophrenia

DSM IV

733

37.8 (11.3)

         

Cohn T, 2004 [37]

Cross-sectional

Canada

Psychiatric hospital & secondary services

Schizophrenia & related disorders

DSM IV

240

43.6 (1.3)

    

7,020

43.6 (1.3)

   

Correll CU, 2006 [46]

Cross-sectional

USA

Psychiatric hospital

Psychiatric diagnosis

Not reported

367

42.9 (15.3)

         

Correll CU, 2011 [47]

Cross-sectional

USA

Psychiatric hospital

Psychiatric diagnosis

Not reported

127

39.3 (14.9)

  

2.5 (4.2)

      

Daumit GL, 2008 [48]

RCT

USA

Secondary services

Schizophrenia

DSM IV

1.125

40.7 (11.1)

  

8.5 (7.4)

      

Dickerson FB, 2013 [49]

RCT

USA

Secondary services

SMI

DSM IV

291

          

Druss BG, 2010 [50]

RCT

USA

Secondary services

SMI

Not reported

407

          

Ferreira L, 2010 [51]

Case-control

Portugal

Secondary services

Schizophrenia

DSM IV

125

41.0 (11.0)

    

1,721

41.0 (12.0)

   

Foguet-Boreu Q, 2013 [32]

Cross-sectional

Spain

Secondary services

SMI

Not reported

137

51.1 (12.9)

         

Garcia-Portilla MP, 2009 [52]

Cross-sectional

Spain

Secondary services

Bipolar disorders

ICD10

194

46.6

  

7.6 (7.4)

1.8 (4.4)

     

Goodrich DE, 2012 [53]

RCT

USA

Secondary services

Schizophrenia

Not reported

134

52.8 (9.9)

         

Goff DC, 2005 [24]

Case-control

USA

Secondary services

Schizophrenia

DSM IV

689

40.4 (11.2)

    

687

40.4 (11.2)

  

6.5

Grover S, 2014 [54]

Cross-sectional

India

Hospital

Bipolar disorder

ICD10

105

39.6 (13.1)

  

3.4 (5.0)

1.7 (1.8)

     

Hoffman BM, 2010 [55]

RCT

USA

H ospital

Depressive disorder

DSM IV

46

53.4 (7.0)

14.0 (9.0) Only males.

        

Jin H, 2011 [56]

Cross-sectional

USA

Secondary services

With psychotic symptoms

DSM IV

179

63.1

         

Mackin P, 2007 [25]

Case-control

UK

Secondary services

Psychiatric diagnosis

Not reported

90

45.7 (11.8)

11.3 (12.3)

1.7 (3.2)

9.3 (10.5)

 

92

43.5 (13.6)

6.8 (6.4)

1.0 (1.1)

4.7 (4.3)

Margari F, 2013 [26]

Cross-sectional

Italy

Psychiatric hospital

Psychiatric diagnosis

DSM IV

83

47.0 (9.0)

8.3 (5.8)

   

77

52.0 (8.6)

10.7 (5.9)

  

McCreadie RG, 2003 [27]

Cross-sectional

UK

Secondary services

Schizophrenia

DSM IV

102

45.0 (13.0)

  

9.5 (7.6)

     

4.1 (4.0)

McLean G, 2014 [23]

Cross-sectional

UK

Primary care

Schizophrenia & related disorders

Read code

1.942

     

215,165

    

Nurjono M, 2014 [57]

Cross-sectional

Singapore

Psychiatric hospital

Schizophrenia

DSM IV

64

          

Osborn DP, 2006 [36]

Cross-sectional

UK

Primary care

SMI

Not reported

74

     

148

    

Protopopova D, 2012 [58]

Cross-sectional

Czech Republic

Psychiatric hospital

Schizophrenia & pychoses

ICD10

129

36.0 (11.9)

         

Ratliff JC, 2013 [28]

Case-control

USA

Secondary services

Schizophrenia & related disorders

DSM IV

115

47.5 (8.3)

10.7

   

197

47.7 (8.5)

8.5

  

Said MA, 2012 [59]

Cross-sectional

Malaysia

Hospital

Schizophrenia

DSM IV

270

   

6.3 (5.6)

      

Stroup TS, 2013 [60]

RCT

USA

Secondary services

Schizophrenia & related disorders.

Not reported

215

41.1 (11.1)

  

7.3 (5.7)

      

Sicras-Mainar A, 2013 [61]

Cross-sectional

Spain

Primary, secondary & hospital care services

Schizophrenia & related disorders

DSM IV

705

48.2 (15.8)

11.9 (5.7)

        

Slomka JM, 2012 [62]

RCT

USA

Secondary services

Bipolar disorder

Not reported

118

53.0 (9.9)

13.7 (10.0)

        

Smith PJ, 2007 [63]

RCT

USA

Not reported

Depressive disorder

DSM IV

198

51.6 (7.5)

  

5.4 (3.2)

      

Tay YH, 2013 [29]

Cross-sectional

China

Secondary services

Schizophrenia

DSM IV

83

36.2 (7.7)

4.7 (4.7)

   

243

34.6 (8.2)

3.1 (3.2)

  

Taylor V, 2010 [64]

Case-control

Canada

Secondary services

Bipolar disorder & major depressive disorder

DSM IV

54

25.9 (7.0)

    

104

    

Wysokiński A, 2012 [65]

Retrospective review

Poland

Psychiatric hospital

Psychotic disorder

ICD10

62

38.0 (12.4)

6.4 (7.2)

3.7 (2.8)

5.8 (6.1)

      

Zuidersma M, 2015 [66]

Cross-sectional

Netherlands

Primary & secondary care services

Depressive disorder

DSM IV

352

70.7 (7.4)

5.8 (3.8)

        

Abbreviations: FRS Framingham risk score, CVD cardiovascular disease, CHD cardiovascular heart disease, MI myocardial infarction, SCORE systematic coronary risk evaluation, NE: SMI severe mental illness, DSM-IV diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, 4th Edition, ICD-10 International classification of diseases, 10th revision, RCT randomized controlled trial

In 30 studies, methodological quality was evaluated with STROBE and most showed a high quality score (median 21.00, SD: 6.40). Five were evaluated with CONSORT and most had a low quality score (median 18.57, SD: 2.72). The STROBE evaluation revealed two main weaknesses: insufficient efforts to address potential sources of bias and sparse information for each variable of interest on the number of participants with missing data. The CONSORT weaknesses were the method used to generate the random allocation sequence and type of randomisation; details of any restriction (such as blocking and block size); and information about where the full trial protocol can be accessed, if available (Additional file 1: Appendix 1).

Of the 35 studies included, only 7 studies had control groups [22, 2429]. These studies used different scores to evaluate CVR (Table 2). Three studies included only patients with schizophrenia and controls: two studies were based on FRS (CVD) scores: 10.7 vs. 8.5 p ≤ 0.01 [28] and 4.7 (4.7) vs. 3.1 (3.2), p = 0.002 [29] and one was based on FRS (CHD) scores: 8.6 (7.3) vs. 6.3 (6.0), p < 0.001 [24]. Two studies included psychiatric diagnoses and were based on FRS (CVD) scores: 11.3 (12.3) vs. 6.8 (6.4), p < 0.01 [25] and 8.3 (5.8) vs. 10.7 (5.9), p = 0.05 [26]. One study included depressive disorders: 10.3 (7.6) vs. 10.1 (7.7), p = 0.97 [22]. One study had insufficient data and was not included in the meta-analysis.

Table 3 synthesized the data about CVR scores found in studies by diagnosis groups of diseases. The CVR mean score assessed with FRS (CVD) in patients with depression ranged from 5.8 to 14.0, in patients with schizophrenia from 4.7 to 11.9, and was 13.7 in the only study of patients with bipolar disorder. Studies that addressed patients with SMI reported that CVR had been expressed in different forms (Table 3).
Table 3

Cardiovascular risk assessment by diagnostic group (depressive, bipolar, SMI and schizophrenia)

Diagnosis Groups

Author, year

Psychiatric Group

Notes

  

FRS [mean (SD)]

SCORE [mean (SD)]

 
  

CVD

Stroke

CHD

  

Bipolar disorder

Grover S, 2014 [54]

  

3.4 (5.0)

1.7 (1.8)

 
 

Slomka JM, 2012 [62]

13.7 (10.0)

    
 

Garcia-Portilla MP, 2009 [52]

  

7.6 (7.4)

1.8 (4.4)

 

Depressive disorder

Acharya T, 2013 [43]

    

FRS (CHD) expressed by types of antidepressive medication groups.

 

Allan CL, 2011 [22]

 

10.3 (7.6)

   
 

Hoffman BM, 2010 [55]

14.0 (9.0)

    
 

Smith PJ, 2007 [63]

  

3.2

  
 

Zuidersma M, 2015 [66]

5.8 (3.8)

    

Schizophrenia

Bernardo M, 2009 [45]

    

SCORE: <1 %: 15.1 %; 1–4 %:68.8 %; 5–10 %: 6.1 %; 11–15 %:0.3 % and ≥15 %;0.1 %

 

Daumit GL, 2008 [48]

  

8.5 (7.4)

  
 

Ferreira L, 2010 [51]

    

SCORE: no statistically significant difference between case and controls was observed.

 

Goodrich DE, 2012 [53]

    

FRS (CVD): <10 %: 40.7 %, 10–20 %: 40.7 % and >20 %: 18.6 %

 

Goff DC, 2005 [24]

    

FRS (CHD): In men: CATIE study: 9.4 (7.2); NHANES study: 7.0 (6.3) and in women: 6.3 (6.3) and 4.2 (4.5), respectively.

 

McCreadie RG, 2003 [27]

 

4.1

9.6

  
 

Nurjono M, 2014 [57]

    

FRS (CVD): Participants in the highest quartile of serum BDNF had a 3.3 times increased in FRS over those in the lowest quartile.

 

Said MA, 2012 [59]

  

6.3 (5.6)

 

31.5 % of patients in the metabolic syndrome group had a high/very high FRS (CHD) vs. 11 % in non-metabolic syndrome group (p < 0.001)

 

Tay YH, 2013 [29]

4.7 (4.7)

    
 

Protopopova D, 2012 [58]

    

SCORE ≥ 5 %: 10 %

 

Arango C, 2008 [44]

  

6.8 (6.9)

0.9 (1.9)

 
 

Cohn T, 2004 [37]

    

FRS (MI): 8.9 % in males, compared with control subjects (6.3) (p < 0.001) and 2.6 % females (vs. Control subjects 2.0 %) (p = 0.180).

 

McLean G, 2014 [23]

    

Joint British Societies score: risk levels by age group and gender. Age was a major factor being identified as high risk (>20 %), with 79 % of those with schizophrenia aged 65–74 estimated at high risk compared with only 1.3 % of those aged 35–44.

 

Ratliff JC, 2013 [28]

10.7

    
 

Stroup TS, 2013 [60]

  

7.3 (5.7)

  
 

Sicras-Mainar A, 2013 [61]

11.9 (5.7)

    

SMI

Dickerson FB, 2013 [49]

    

FRS (CVD) in smokers 13.2 (11.9) and nonsmokers 7.4 (7.2)

Druss BG, 2010 [50]

    

FRS (CHD): 6.9 for intervention and 9.8 for control group.

Foguet-Boreu Q, 2013 [32]

    

FRS (REGICOR): high (≥10 %): 4.6 % and SCORE: high (≥5 %): 5.4 %

Osborn DP, 2006 [36]

    

FRS (CHD): median: 5 % (IQR:2–12)

Psychiatric diagnoses

Wysokiński A, 2012 [65]

6.4 (7.2)

3.7 (2.8)

5.8 (6.1)

  

Correll CU, 2006 [46]

    

FRS (CHD): 8.29 (0.49) in men and 2.33 (0.52) in women.

Jin H, 2011 [56]

    

FRS (CHD) was increased by 79 % in schizophrenia, 72 % in posttraumatic stress disorder and 61 % in mood disorder.

Mackin P, 2007 [25]

11.3 (12.3)

1.7 (3.2)

9.3 (10.5)

  

Margari F, 2013 [26]

8.3 (5.8)

    

Correll CU, 2011 [47]

  

2.5 (4.2)

  

Taylor V, 2010 [64]

    

FRS (CHD) was lower for patients at baseline and follow-up, but increased across the follow-up period (2-years). Women patients showed an increase risk for CHD over time, and men did not.

Data are expressed as mean (SD), unless otherwise stated

Abbreviations: FRS Framingham risk score, CVD cardiovascular disease, CHD cardiovascular heart disease, MI myocardial infarction, SCORE systematic coronary risk evaluation, SMI severe mental illness, PTSD posttraumatic stress disorder

Subgroup analysis was performed in six studies (3 involving schizophrenia, 1 depressive disorder and 2 psychiatric diagnoses in general). Higher CVR was observed in patients with schizophrenia than in those with depressive disorder or general psychiatric diagnosis, with a pooled SMD (95 % CI) as follows: 0.63 (0.16, 1.09), 0.03 (−0.48, 0.54), and 0.02 (−0.82, 0.86), respectively (Table 4). The sensitivity analysis omitted one study at a time, showing a pooled SMD ranging from 0.19 to 0.50. Funnel plots did not suggest any publication bias (Additional file 2: Appendix 2).
Table 4

Stratified pooled standardized mean differences for cardiovascular risk assessment

 

Number of studies

SMD

I 2

(95 % CI)

Diagnosis

   

Depressive disorder

1

0.03 (−0.48, 0.54)

0 %

Schizophrenia

3

0.63 (0.16, 1.09)

94 %

Psychiatric diagnosis

2

0.02 (−0.82, 0.86)

92 %

Criteria for diagnosis

   

NE

1

0.35 (0.24, 0.45)

84 %

DSM IV

5

0.32 (−0.11, 0.75)

94 %

Study design

   

Observational study

5

0.34 (−0.21, 0.88)

94 %

RCT

1

0.35 (0.24, 0.45)

0 %

Outcome

   

CVD total

4

0.40 (−0.44, 1.02)

95 %

CHD

1

0.35 (0.24, 0.45)

0 %

Stroke

1

0.03 (−0.48, 0.54)

0 %

Abbreviations: SMD standardized mean difference, CI confidence interval, NE non-specific, DSM IV statistical manual of mental disorders, RCT randomized controlled trial, CVD cardiovascular disease, CHD coronary heart disease

Six studies that included 1,065 people with SMI who had a CVR assessment and 1,567 people without SMI were included in the meta-analysis [22, 2427, 29]. The total overall CVR between the psychiatric group and control group showed a SMD of 0.35 (95 % CI:−0.02–0.71, P = 0.06) with significantly high heterogeneity (I 2 = 93 %; p < 0.001) (Fig. 2).
Fig. 2

Summary of forest plot. Standardized mean differences between psychiatric group and comparative group

Discussion

Data from studies that reported CVR scores did not support higher risk in patients with SMI than in the control population. Subgroup analysis showed a higher CVR associated with schizophrenia than with other SMIs. Only in patients with schizophrenia was there some evidence of higher CVR scores than in the control population.

To date it has been widely accepted that the prevalence of modifiable risk factors was increased in patients with SMI [30]. Nonetheless, several authors have suggested that not all risk factors were equally increased in these patients. A number of studies have found that smoking and diabetes rates were higher in the SMI population than in the reference population [31], while others observed that hypertension was not increased among SMI patients [3133]. Conversely, other authors did not detect significant differences in CVR factors between participants with and without SMI [34]. This could be the result of publication bias affecting CVR studies and therefore affecting CVR assessment. Chapman et al., in a meta-analysis of 42 studies on smoking in patients with schizophrenia, revealed that studies reporting low prevalence of this risk factor are cited less often than those reporting higher prevalence in this population [35].

Numerous previous studies have noted the importance of CVR factors in patients with SMI, but only a few of them incorporated CVR evaluation in the last 12 years. No other systematic review has been found in the literature on this topic. However, Osborn et al., in a systematic review which objective was to determine the relative risk of some CVR factors in people with SMIs, synthesized data about some studies that reported 10 year cardiovascular risk scores [31]. One controlled community study, including 74 SMI patients found that excess CVR scores showed that participants with SMI had higher FRS (CHD) than participants without SMI (median 10-year risk: 5 vs. 4 %) [36]. Another study, including 84 schizophrenic patients showed a significant increase of CVR only in males based on FRS (CHD) (10.4 vs. 6.4 %) [27]. And the last, involves 240 patients schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorders showed also an increased risk based on FRS (MI) score only in male patients compared to controls (8.9 vs. 6.3 %) [37]. Our review also showed that schizophrenia is the group that have more evidence of higher CVR than control groups and is consistent with other studies [38, 39].

However, the discrepancy between data showing higher CVR in SMI and the CVR assessment obtained in our review raises some questions. The tools to measure CVR that have been validated for general population may not apply to patients with SMI. In this sense, Osborn et al. proposed a CVR prediction model for this population [40]. In addition to the usual predictors, this model also included social deprivation, heavy alcohol use, SMI diagnosis, and prescriptions for antidepressants and antipsychotics [40]. Another key point is the influence of the prescribed medications on CVR. There is strong evidence that antipsychotic drugs, and to a more restricted degree antidepressants and mood stabilizers, are associated with an increased risk for several physical diseases, including obesity, dyslipidaemia, diabetes mellitus and so on [41]. Furthermore, unclear benefits of different kinds of antipsychotics (first vs. second-generation antipsychotics) have been reported [42], despite the superior efficacy and greater treatment persistence attributed to second-generation antipsychotics.

Our analysis showed that schizophrenia is the group at highest risk, in consonance with other studies that showed an increased risk in patients with schizophrenia and depression, compared to other SMIs [41, 42]. Of the three studies of schizophrenic patients included in the forest plot summary, McCreadie et al. [27] clearly had the highest SMD. This difference may be explained by the inclusion of older patients with a longer history of illness compared to the other two studies [24, 29].

Strengths and weaknesses of this review

The major strength of this study is that it is the first review to focus on CVR assessments in patients with SMI. The search identified a large number of studies (67) that showed CVR data. Osborn et al. centred their attention on studies of CVR factors and also showed results of CVR assessments provided by 4 studies, three of which included only schizophrenia and related disorders; one study also included non-affective chronic psychotic illness [31].

Our study also has a number of limitations to be taken into account. We only searched a single data source, although this limitation was countered by an extensive manual search (snowball method). Furthermore, a large number of studies had no control group, making it impossible to include them in the meta-analysis. Of the 7 studies with control groups [22, 2429], only 6 had sufficient data for inclusion in the meta-analysis and the heterogeneity of data synthesis was considerable (I2 > 75 %). Therefore, all the conclusions of the meta-analysis should be considered with caution. The variability of the studies included in the meta-analysis could be attributed to the ages of the participants, the diagnoses included, and differences in study design.

Implications for future research

Further work is needed to establish whether patients with SMI have increased CVR compared to general population. More information on the type of CVR assessment used would help to establish a greater degree of accuracy on this question. A new risk assessment approach may be needed in future studies in order to include other relevant factors (obesity, psychotropic drugs and social deprivation) [38]. In addition, a discussion is needed to reach consensus on an operational definition of SMI that can be applied for research purposes.

Conclusions

A review of literature reporting CVR assessment in patients with SMI did not find sufficient evidence to determine whether or not there is a higher risk in these patients relative to the reference population. Subgroup analysis showed a higher CVR in patients with schizophrenia compared to those with depressive disorder or a psychiatric diagnosis. Only in patients with schizophrenia was there some evidence of higher CVR scores than in the control population. Instead of the generalized idea that SMI is associated with increased CVR, it is important to consider the complexity of summarizing the data because there is no universal definition of SMI or standard methods to describe CVR in this population. Further work is needed to elucidate whether new CVR charts that incorporate intrinsic determinants (as the effect of psychotropic drugs or social deprivation) should be established for risk assessment in this population.

Ethics and consent to participate

Not Applicable.

Consent to publish

Not Applicable.

Availability of data and materials

The data and materials used in this review are available on request.

Abbreviations

CHD: 

cardiovascular heart disease

CVD: 

cardiovascular disease

CVR: 

cardiovascular risk

DSM-IV: 

diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, 4th edition

FRS: 

Framingham risk score

ICD-10: 

International Classification of Diseases, 10th revision

MI: 

myocardial infarction

SCORE: 

systematic coronary risk evaluation

SMI: 

severe mental illness

WHO: 

World Health Organization

Declarations

Acknowledgements

The authors appreciate the English language review by Elaine Lilly, PhD, and are grateful to Carmen Ibáñez for administrative support.

Funding

This research has been funded by the Ministry of Science and Innovation through the Instituto Carlos III (PI12/00427). This study received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors. LA is funded by the National Institute of Health Research (NIHR) UK. The funders had no role in the study design, collection, analysis and interpretation of data, writing of the manuscript and decision to submit for publication. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of IDIAP Jordi Gol and NIHR.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Institut Universitari d’Investigació en Atenció Primària Jordi Gol (IDIAP Jordi Gol), Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona
(2)
Department of Medical Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Girona
(3)
Técnica de Salud ICS, Unitat Docent AFiC
(4)
Faculty of Nursing, University of Girona
(5)
The Westborough Road Health Centre
(6)
Centre of Primary Care and Public Health, Queen Mary University of London
(7)
Departamento de Psiquiatría y Medicina Legal, Instituto de Neuropsiquiatría y Adicciones (INAD), Hospital del Mar Parc de Salut Mar., Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona
(8)
Gimbernat School of Nursing, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona

References

  1. Lozano R, Naghavi M, Foreman K, Lim S, Shibuya K, Aboyans V, et al. Global and regional mortality from 235 causes of death for 20 age groups in 1990 and 2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet. 2012;380(9859):2095–128.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Murray CJ, Vos T, Lozano R, Naghavi M, Flaxman AD, Michaud C, et al. Disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) for 291 diseases and injuries in 21 regions, 1990–2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet. 2012;380(9859):2197–223.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. Fifth. Arlington: American Psychiatic Publishing; 2013.Google Scholar
  4. Ruggeri M, Leese M, Thornicroft G, Bisoffi G, Tansella M. Definition and prevalence of severe and persistent mental illness. Br J Psychiatry. 2000;177:149–55.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Guideline development group of the Clinical Practice Guideline on Psychosocial Interventions in Severe Mental Illness. Clinical practice guideline on psychosocial interventions in severe mental illness. Madrid: Ministry of Health and Social Policy; 2009.Google Scholar
  6. De Hert M, Correll CU, Bobes J, Cetkovich-Bakmas M, Cohen D, Asai I, et al. Physical illness in patients with severe mental disorders. I. Prevalence, impact of medications and disparities in health care. World Psychiatry. 2011;10:52–77.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Newcomer JW. Medical risk in patients with bipolar disorder and schizophrenia. J Clin Psychiatry. 2006;67:e16.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Pérez-Piñar M, Mathur R, Foguet Q, Ayis S, Robson J, Ayerbe L. Cardiovascular risk factors among patients with schizophrenia, bipolar, depressive, anxiety, and personality disorders. Eur Psychiatry. 2016;35:8–15.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Mainar A, Blanca-Tamayo M, Rejas-Gutiérrez J, Navarro- Artieda R. Metabolic syndrome in outpatients receiving antipsychotic therapy in routine clinical practice: a crosssectional assessment of a primary health care database. Eur Psychiatry. 2008;23:100–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Jomas BS, Franks P, Ingram DD. Are symptoms of anxiety and depression risk factors for hypertension? Longitudinal evidence from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey I Epidemiologic Follow-up Study. Arch Fam Med. 1997;6:43–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Patten SB, Williams JV, Lavorato DH, Modgill G, Jetté N, Eliasziw M. Major depression as a risk factor for chronic disease incidence: longitudinal analyses in a general population cohort. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2008;30:407–11.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Gold KJ, Kilbourne AM, Valenstein M. Primary care of patients with serious mental illness: your chance to make a difference. J Fam Pract. 2008;57:515–25.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Bobes J, Sáiz J, Montes JM, Mostaza J, Rico-Villademoros F, Vieta E. Consenso Español de Salud Física del Paciente con Trastorno bipolar. Rev Psiquatr Salud Ment (Barc). 2008;1:26–37.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Ruetsch O, Viala A, Bardou H, Martin P, Vacheron MN. Psychotropic drugs induced weight gain: a review of the literature concerning epidemiological data, mechanisms and management. Encéphale. 2005;31(4 Pt 1):507–16.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Taylor D. Antidepressant drugs and cardiovascular pathology: a clinical overview of affectiveness and safety. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2008;118:434–42.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Kaplan NM. Clinical hypertension. 5th ed. Madrid: Lippincott Williams&Wilkins; 2006.Google Scholar
  17. Stroup DF, Berlin JA, Morton SC, Olkin I, Williamson GD, Rennie D, et al. Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting. Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology (MOOSE) group. JAMA. 2000;283:2008–12.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, The PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009;6(6), e1000097.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  19. Vandenbroucke JP, von Elm E, Altman DG, Gøtzsche PC, Mulrow CD, Pocock SJ, et al. Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): explanation and elaboration. PLoS Med. 2007;4(10):e297.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  20. Schulz KF, Altman DG, Moher D, CONSORT Group. CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. BMC Med. 2010;8:18.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  21. Higgins JP, Thompson SG. Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Stat Med. 2002;21(11):1539–58.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Allan CL, Sexton CE, Kalu UG, McDermott LM, Kivimäki M, Singh-Manoux A, et al. Does the Framingham Stroke Risk Profile predict white-matter changes in late-life depression? Int Psychogeriatr. 2012;24(4):524–31.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. McLean G, Martin JL, Martin DJ, Guthrie B, Mercer SW, Smith DJ. Standard cardiovascular disease risk algorithms underestimate the risk of cardiovascular disease in schizophrenia: evidence from a national primary care database. Schizophr Res. 2014;159(1):176–81.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Goff DC, Sullivan LM, McEvoy JP, Meyer JM, Nasrallah HA, Daumit GL, et al. A comparison of ten-year cardiac risk estimates in schizophrenia patients from the CATIE study and matched controls. Schizophr Res. 2005;80(1):45–53.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Mackin P, Bishop D, Watkinson H, Gallagher P, Ferrier IN. Metabolic disease and cardiovascular risk in people treated with antipsychotics in the community. Br J Psychiatry. 2007;191:23–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Margari F, Lozupone M, Pisani R, Pastore A, Todarello O, Zagaria G, et al. Metabolic syndrome: differences between psychiatric and internal medicine patients. Int J Psychiatry Med. 2013;45(3):203–26.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. McCreadie RG, Scottish Schizophrenia Lifestyle Group. Diet, smoking and cardiovascular risk in people with schizophrenia: descriptive study. Br J Psychiatry. 2003;183:534–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Ratliff JC, Palmese LB, Reutenauer EL, Srihari VH, Tek C. Obese schizophrenia spectrum patients have significantly higher 10-year general cardiovascular risk and vascular ages than obese individuals without severe mental illness. Psychosomatics. 2013;54(1):67–73.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  29. Tay YH, Nurjono M, Lee J. Increased Framingham 10-year CVD risk in Chinese patients with schizophrenia. Schizophr Res. 2013;147(1):187–92.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. De Hert M, Dekker JM, Wood D, Kahl KG, Holt RI, Moller HJ. Cardiovascular disease and diabetes in people with severe mental illness position statement from the European Psychiatric Association (EPA), supported by the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD) and the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Psychiatry. 2009;24:412–24.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Osborn DP, Wright CA, Levy G, King MB, Deo R, Nazareth I. Relative risk of diabetes, dyslipidaemia, hypertension and the metabolic syndrome in people with severe mental illnesses: systematic review and metaanalysis. BMC Psychiatry. 2008;8:84.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  32. Foguet Boreu Q, Roura Poch P, Bullón Chia A, Mauri Martin C, Gordo Serra N, Costa RC; en representación del grupo de Riesgo Cardiovascular en Trastorno Mental Severo (RISCA-TMS). Cardiovascular risk factors, cardiovascular risk and quality of life in patients with a severe mental disorder. Aten Primaria. 2013;45(3):141–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Castillo-Sánchez M, Fàbregas-Escurriola M, Bergè-Baquero D, Foguet-Boreu Q, Fernández-San Martín MI, Goday-Arno A. Schizophrenia, antipsychotic drugs and cardiovascular risk: Descriptive study in primary care. Eur Psychiatry. 2015;30(4):535–41.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Clerici M, Bartoli F, Carretta D, Crocamo C, Bebbington P, Carrà G. Cardiovascular risk factors among people with severe mental illness in Italy: a cross-sectional comparative study. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2014;36(6):698–702.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Chapman S, Ragg M, McGeechan K. Citation bias in reported smoking prevalence in people with schizophrenia. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2009;43(3):277–82.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Osborn DP, Nazareth I, King MB. Risk for coronary heart disease in people with severe mental illness: cross-sectional comparative study in primary care. Br J Psychiatry. 2006;188:271–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Cohn T, Prud'homme D, Streiner D, Kameh H, Remington G. Characterizing coronary heart disease risk in chronic schizophrenia: high prevalence of the metabolic syndrome. Can J Psychiatry. 2004;49(11):753–60.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Fan Z, Wu Y, Shen J, Ji T, Zhan R. Schizophrenia and the risk of cardiovascular diseases: a meta-analysis of thirteen cohort studies. J Psychiatr Res. 2013;47(11):1549–56.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Van der Kooy K, van Hout H, Marwijk H, Marten H, Stehouwer C, Beekman A. Depression and the risk for cardiovascular diseases: systematic review and metaanalysis. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2007;22(7):613–26.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Osborn DP, Hardoon S, Omar RZ, Holt RI, King M, Larsen J, et al. Cardiovascular risk prediction models for people with severe mental illness: results from the prediction and management of cardiovascular risk in people with severe mental illnesses (PRIMROSE) research program. JAMA Psychiatry. 2015;72(2):143–51.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  41. Correll CU, Detraux J, De Lepeleire J, De Hert M. Effects of antipsychotics, antidepressants and mood stabilizers on risk for physical diseases in people with schizophrenia, depression and bipolar disorder. World Psychiatry. 2015;14(2):119–36.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  42. Hartling L, Abou-Setta AM, Dursun S, Mousavi SS, Pasichnyk D, Newton AS. Antipsychotics in adults with schizophrenia: comparative effectiveness of first-generation versus second-generation medications: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med. 2012;157(7):498–511.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Acharya T, Acharya S, Tringali S, Huang J. Association of antidepressant and atypical antipsychotic use with cardiovascular events and mortality in a veteran population. Pharmacotherapy. 2013;33(10):1053–61.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Arango C, Bobes J, Kirkpatrick B, Garcia-Garcia M, Rejas J. Psychopathology, coronary heart disease and metabolic syndrome in schizophrenia spectrum patients with deficit versus non-deficit schizophrenia: findings from the CLAMORS study. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2011;21(12):867–75.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Bernardo M, Cañas F, Banegas JR, Casademont J, Riesgo Y, Varela C; RICAVA Study Group. Prevalence and awareness of cardiovascular risk factors in patients with schizophrenia: a cross-sectional study in a low cardiovascular disease risk geographical area. Eur Psychiatry. 2009;24(7):431–41.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Correll CU, Frederickson AM, Kane JM, Manu P. Metabolic syndrome and the risk of coronary heart disease in 367 patients treated with second-generation antipsychotic drugs. J Clin Psychiatry. 2006;67(4):575–83.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Correll CU, Kane JM, Manu P. Obesity and coronary risk in patients treated with second-generation antipsychotics. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2011;261(6):417–23.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  48. Daumit GL, Goff DC, Meyer JM, Davis VG, Nasrallah HA, McEvoy JP, Rosenheck R, Davis SM, Hsiao JK, Stroup TS, Lieberman JA. Antipsychotic effects on estimated 10-year coronary heart disease risk in the CATIE schizophrenia study. Schizophr Res. 2008;105(1–3):175–87.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  49. Dickerson FB, Yu A, Dalcin A, Jerome GJ, Gennusa 3rd JV, Charleston J, et al. Cigarette smoking and health characteristics in individuals with serious mental illness enrolled in a behavioral weight loss trial. J Dual Diagn. 2013;9(1):39–46.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  50. Druss BG, von Esenwein SA, Compton MT, Rask KJ, Zhao L, Parker RM. A. The primary care access, referral, and evaluation (PCARE) study. Am J Psychiatry. 2010;167(2):151–931.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  51. Ferreira L, Belo A, Abreu-Lima C. A case-control study of cardiovascular risk factors and cardiovascular risk among patients with schizophrenia in a country in the low cardiovascular risk region of Europe. Rev Port Cardiol. 2010;29(10):1481–93.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Garcia-Portilla MP, Saiz PA, Bascaran MT, Martínez AS, Benabarre A, Sierra P, et al. Cardiovascular risk in patients with bipolar disorder. J Affect Disord. 2009;115(3):302–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Goodrich DE, Kilbourne AM, Lai Z, Post EP, Bowersox NW, Mezuk B, et al. Design and rationale of a randomized controlled trial to reduce cardiovascular disease risk for patients with bipolar disorder. Contemp Clin Trials. 2012;33(4):666–78.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Grover S, Nebhinani N, Chakrabarti S, Avasthi A, Basu D, Kulhara P, et al. Cardiovascular risk factors among bipolar disorder patients admitted to an inpatient unit of a tertiary care hospital in India. Asian J Psychiatr. 2014;10:51–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Hoffman BM, Sherwood A, Smith PJ, Babyak MA, Doraiswamy PM, Hinderliter A, et al. Cardiovascular disease risk, vascular health and erectile dysfunction among middle-aged, clinically depressed men. Int J Impot Res. 2010;22(1):30–5.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  56. Jin H, Folsom D, Sasaki A, Mudaliar S, Henry R, Torres M, et al. Increased Framingham 10-year risk of coronary heart disease in middle-aged and older patients with psychotic symptoms. Schizophr Res. 2011;125(2–3):295–9.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  57. Nurjono M, Tay YH, Lee J. The relationship between serum brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) and cardiometabolic indices in schizophrenia. Schizophr Res. 2014;157(1–3):244–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Protopopova D, Masopust J, Maly R, Valis M, Bazant J. The prevalence of cardiometabolic risk factors and the ten-year risk of fatal cardiovascular events in patients with schizophrenia and related psychotic disorders. Psychiatr Danub. 2012;24(3):307–13.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Said MA, Sulaiman AH, Habil MH, Das S, Bakar AK, Yusoff RM, et al. Metabolic syndrome and cardiovascular risk among patients with schizophrenia receiving antipsychotics in Malaysia. Singapore Med J. 2012;53(12):801–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Stroup TS, Byerly MJ, Nasrallah HA, Ray N, Khan AY, Lamberti JS, et al. Effects of switching from olanzapine, quetiapine, and risperidone to aripiprazole on 10-year coronary heart disease risk and metabolic syndrome status: results from a randomized controlled trial. Schizophr Res. 2013;146(1–3):190–5.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  61. Sicras-Mainar A, Rejas-Gutiérrez J, Navarro-Artieda R, Blanca-Tamayo M. C-reactive protein as a marker of cardiovascular disease in patients with a schizophrenia spectrum disorder treated in routine medical practice. Eur Psychiatry. 2013;28(3):161–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Slomka JM, Piette JD, Post EP, Krein SL, Lai Z, Goodrich DE, et al. Mood disorder symptoms and elevated cardiovascular disease risk in patients with bipolar disorder. J Affect Disord. 2012;138(3):405–8.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  63. Smith PJ, Blumenthal JA, Babyak MA, Hoffman BM, Doraiswamy PM, Waugh R, et al. Cerebrovascular risk factors, vascular disease, and neuropsychological outcomes in adults with major depression. Psychosom Med. 2007;69(6):578–86.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  64. Taylor V, McKinnon MC, Macdonald K, Jaswal G, Macqueen GM. Adults with mood disorders have an increased risk profile for cardiovascular disease within the first 2 years of treatment. Can J Psychiatry. 2010;55(6):362–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. Wysokiński A, Kowman M, Kłoszewska I. The prevalence of metabolic syndrome and Framingham cardiovascular risk scores in adult inpatients taking antipsychotics - a retrospective medical records review. Psychiatr Danub. 2012;24(3):314–22.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. Zuidersma M, Izaks GJ, Naarding P, Comijs HC, Oude Voshaar RC. Vascular burden and cognitive function in late-life depression. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2015;23(5):514–24.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Foguet-Boreu et al. 2016

Advertisement