Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Magnitude and associated factors of aggressive behaviour among patients with bipolar disorder at Amanual Mental Specialized Hospital, outpatient department, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: cross-sectional study

  • Habte Belete1Email author,
  • Haregwoin Mulat2,
  • Tolesa Fanta3,
  • Solomon Yimer4,
  • Takele Shimelash5,
  • Tilahun Ali6 and
  • Tilahun Tewabe7
BMC PsychiatryBMC series – open, inclusive and trusted201616:443

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-016-1151-8

Received: 25 January 2016

Accepted: 1 December 2016

Published: 12 December 2016

Abstract

Background

Aggressive behavior is a challenging behavior among bipolar patients that causes poor social interaction and hospitalization. But, there is no information regards of the magnitude and contributing factors for aggressive behaviour among bipolar patients in Ethiopia. Therefore, this study was designed to assess the prevalence and associated factors of aggressive behaviour among patients with bipolar disorder.

Method

An institutional based cross sectional study was conducted at Amanual Mental Specialized Hospital from May 1 to June 1, 2015 among 411 participants who were selected by systematic random sampling technique. Data was collected by interview technique by using Modified Overt Aggression Scale, entered and analyzed by using Epi Data 3.1 and Statistical Package for Social Science version 20, respectively. Adjusted Odd Ratio (AOR) with 95% Confidence Interval (CI) were used to show the odd and P-value <0.05 was considered as statistically significant.

Results

A total of 411 bipolar patients were included in the study and the prevalence of aggressive behaviour was 29.4%. Significant associated factors for aggression were, having two or more episode [AOR = 2.35 95% CI (1.18, 4.69)], previous history of aggression, [AOR = 3.72, 95% CI (1.54, 8.98)], depressive symptoms [AOR = 3.63, 95% CI (1.89, 6.96)], psychotic symptoms [AOR = 5.41,95% CI (2.88, 10.1)], manic symptoms [AOR = 3.85,95% CI (2.06, 7.19)], poor medication adherence [AOR = 3.73 95% CI (1.71, 8.13)], poor social support [AOR = 2.99 95% CI (1.30, 6.91)] and current use of substance[AOR = 2.17 95% CI (1.16, 4.06)].

Conclusion

Prevalence of aggression is high among bipolar patients and associated with many factors. So it needs public health attention to decrease aggression among bipolar patients.

Keywords

Aggressive behaviour Bipolar disorder Ethiopia

Background

Bipolar disorder is a severe and chronic psychiatric illness in which patients swing between episodes of depression and mania/hypomania that affects individual’s cognitive, emotion, behavior and social abilities [1]. Bipolar disorder has a 2.4% burden (years lived with disability) of world’s population that puts on the 6th leading cause of disability-adjusted life years in aged 15–44 years. From 14–59% of bipolar patients has suicide ideation and 25–56% has at least one suicide attempt during lifetime, but 15–19% die from suicide. Even causes of suicidal behavior in bipolar disorder are multiple and complex, strong predictors link with impulsivity, aggression and hostility [24].

Aggression is a complex and heterogeneous behavior linked to violence, impulsivity, irritability, and hostility. Violence means physical attacks on other people, self, or objects while impulsivity is acting without control or premeditation. In other side, agitation means hostile or violent behavior or attitudes; readiness to attack or confront and hostility means unfriendly or threatening behavior or feelings [5].

Aggressive behavior is common among bipolar disorder patients that cause hospitalization especially during manic, mixed episodes, or psychotic states of bipolar disorders. Rate of violent crime is higher than the general population among bipolar patients and face to severe disruptions of occupational, societal, familial and other social functions [6].

Study from Czech Republic show that statistically significant increment for risk of violence among patients with bipolar disorder compare with general population. Even risk of violence was greater among patients with bipolar disorder than schizophrenic patients [7]. A number of studies were conducted regarding aggression among bipolar patients around the world; a systematic review of articles from 11 western countries revealed that the prevalence of aggression was 32.4% [8]. Another Meta analysis of 375 studies from Czech Republic and Slovakia indicates that the prevalence was 31.2% [9]. In Swedish national cohort study the prevalence of aggression was 22.2% [10]. Australian 18 month follow up study indicates that 28.6% show aggressive behaviour [11]. Cross sectional study in Nigeria showed that 24.5% of bipolar patient were aggressive [12]. Not only being bipolar patient but also, being male [13], having current psychotic symptoms [14], co-morbid substance abuse and personality disorders [15, 16] show significant association with aggressive behaviour. Trait aggression was significantly associated with diagnoses of childhood emotional abuse and neglect, childhood physical abuse, post-traumatic stress disorder, antisocial personality disorder [17].

There is a significance association between stress and psychiatric disorders that are predominantly known by aggression manifestation. In Italy, the absence of seclusion or physical restraint was associated with low rate of violence. By using modified version of the Morrison’s scale among Italian psychiatric in-patients, which was only 3.0% of the total 2395 admitted cases were violence in which physical restrain was absent [18, 19].

Systematic Review and Meta-Regression Analysis of 110 Studies in UK show that among 45,533 severe mental ill patients 8,439 (18.5%) were violent and significantly associated with non-adherence for psychological therapies and medication [20].

Despite this higher prevalence, there is no published data in Ethiopia regarding to aggression among bipolar patients. Therefore, this study was intended to assess the prevalence of aggression and associated factors among bipolar patients who attending Amanual mental specialized hospital, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.

Methods

Study setting

Institution based cross sectional study was conducted among bipolar patients who were attending at Amanual Mental Specialized Hospital outpatient clinic. Amanual Mental Specialized Hospital is the only mental hospital in the country and has 15 outpatient departments, among these 8 outpatient departments serves an average of 11,760 bipolar follow-up patients per year and other mentally ill patients. Amanual Mental Specialized Hospital has 300 beds that used to inpatient service for psychiatric patients including bipolar cases.

Participants

All patients who were clinically diagnosis (with Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders IVth edition), by psychiatrists and mental health professional specialists (masters holder on mental health) as bipolar disorder (any type of bipolar disorder) at Amanual Mental Specialized Hospital were the source population. Study population was patients who were attending at outpatient departments during data collection period and those included in the sample. Patients with bipolar disorder and whose age 18 years and above were included in the study and those who were seriously ill and unable to communicate were not included in the study.

The number of sample required for the study was estimated by taking 50% of the prevalence of aggression among bipolar patients in a single population proportion for unknown prevalence, with 5% of marginal error and 10% non response rate. Systematic random sampling technique used for a total 411 participants with every two cases to selected representative sample. Data was collected by degree holder psychiatric nurses with interviewing clients by using a semi-structured questionnaire, from May 1 to June 1, 2015.

Instrument

The presence of aggressive behavior among bipolar patients in the last 7 days was assessed by using the Modified Overt Aggression Scale (MOAS) [21]. MOAS has a total of 16 items with four categories that assesses aggression, namely verbal aggression (with 4 items), aggression against property (with 4 items), auto-aggression (with 4 items), and physical aggression (with 4 items). The severity of aggressive behaviour ranges from 0 (no aggression) to 4 points (maximum violence) for each category. MOAS is validated in Africa, Nigeria [22] among psychiatric patients and has internal consistency 0.84.

Drug adherence was assessed by using Morsiky Medication Adherence Scale 8 item tool [23] and social support was assessed by using Oslo-3 Social support Scale [24]. Perceived stress was assessed by using of Perceived Stress Scale 10 items tool [25] that focus patients experienced stressful life events in the last one month and current substance uses was assessed by adopted alcohol smoking and substance involvement screening test [26].

Analysis

The data was entered and clean up with Epi Data 3.1 and analyzed by using Statistical Package for Social Science version 20. Descriptive statistic was used to show clear picture of the problem. Multivariate and binary logistic regression analysis was implemented to identify factors associated with aggressive behaviour. The strength of the association was presented by odds ratio with 95% confidence interval (CI). P value less than 0.05 were considered as statistically significant in this study.

Ethical clearance

Ethical approval was obtained from Ethical Review Board of University of Gondar and Amanual Mental Specialized Hospital. Formal permission letters was taken from administrative of the hospital and written consent taken from the participants for their voluntary participation. Confidentiality is maintained by omitting personal identification.

Results

A total of 411 bipolar patients were included in the study, 175 (42.6%) were male and 236 (57.4%) were females. The median age of participants was 32 years with inter quartile range 14 and most of the participants 294 (71.5%) were from urban (Table 1).
Table 1

distribution of bipolar patients (n = 411) by socio-demographic factors related to aggressive behaviour attending at Amanual Mental Specialized Hospital; May, 2015

 

Aggressive behavior

Characteristics

Yes

No

Overall

Chisq test(X2)

Sex

 Male

49(28%)

126(72%)

175(42.6%)

0.30

 Female

72(30.5%)

164(69.5%)

236(57.4%)

Residency

 Urban

91(31%)

203(69%)

294(71.5%)

1.14

 Rural

30(25.6%)

87(74.4%)

117(28.5%)

Age

 18–26

33(31.4%)

72(68.6%)

105(25.55%)

2.73

 27–32

29(26.9%)

79(73.1%)

108(26.3%)

 33–40

36(34.3%)

69(65.7%)

105(25.55%)

 41–75

23(24.7%)

70(75.3%)

93(22.6%)

Education

 uneducated

14(20.3%)

55(79.7%)

69(16.8%)

3.69

 Primary

43(31.4%)

94(68.6%)

137(33.33%)

 Secondary

40(30.3)

92(31.7%)

132(32.11%)

 Diploma

14(35%)

26(65%)

40(9.73%)

 Degree and above

10(30.3%)

23(69.7%)

33(8.03%)

Religion

 Orthodox

80(32%)

170(68%)

250(60.8%)

5.08

 Muslim

26(26%)

74(74%)

100(24.3%)

 Protestant

15(24.6%)

46(75.4%)

61(14.9%)

Marital status

 Single

62(32.3%)

130(67.7%)

192(46.7%)

6.70

 Married

45(25%)

135(75%)

180(43.8%)

 Divorced/separate/widowed

14(35.9%)

25(64.1%)

39(9.5%)

Ethnicity

 Amahara

45(31.7%)

97(68.3%)

142(34.6%)

3.61

 Oromo

36(26.7%)

99(73.3%)

135(32.8)

 Gurage

26(31.7%)

56(68.3%)

82(20%)

 Tigray

9(37.5%)

15(62.5%)

24(5.8%)

 Others a

5(17.9%)

23(82.1%)

28(6.8%)

Occupation

 Government employee

12(25.5%)

35(74.5%)

47(11.44%)

5.36

 Nongovernmental employee

10(27.8%)

26(72.2%)

36(8.8%)

 Farmer

10(26.3%)

28(73.7%)

38(9.24%)

 Merchant

20(33.3%)

40(66.7%)

60(14.6%)

 Student

11(42.3%)

15(57.7%)

26(6.3%)

 Housewife

15(23.8%)

48(76.2%)

63(15.32%)

 Daily worker

4(20%)

16(80%)

20(4.9%)

 Jobless

39(32.2%)

82(67.8%)

121(29.4%)

Living condition

 With family

104(29%)

255(71%)

359(87.3%)

30

 Alone

17(32.7%)

35(67.3%)

52(12.7%)

Wealth index

 Lowest

27(32.9%)

55(67.1%)

82(20%)

2.48

 Second

27(30.7%)

61(69.3%)

88(21.4%)

 Middle

20(26%)

57(74%)

77(18.7%)

 Fourth

29(32.6%)

60(67.4%)

89(21.7%)

 Highest

18(24%)

57(76%)

75(18.2%)

Others a (Wolaita, Sidama, Gamo)

Clinical factors

Regarding to clinical factors of the participants 332 (80.8%) of the samples had history of aggression while 292 (61%) of the respondents had history of more than one episode of bipolar disorder (Table 2).
Table 2

distribution of bipolar patients by factors related to aggressive behaviour attending at Amanual Mental Specialized Hospital; May, 2015

 

Aggressive behavior

Characteristics

Yes

No

Overall

Chisq test (X2)

History of aggression

 Yes

110(33.1%)

222(66.9%)

332(80.8%)

11.34

 No

71(13.9%)

68(86.1%)

79(19.2%)

Number of episode

 One episode

19(16%)

100(84%)

119(29%)

14.64

 More than one episode

102(34.9%)

190(65.1%)

292(71%)

Current medication

Antipsychotic

 Yes

71(28.7%)

176(71.3%)

247(60.1%)

.14

 No

50(30.5%)

114(69.5%)

164(39.9%)

Antidepressant

 Yes

15(26.3%)

42(73.7%)

57(13.9%)

.311

 No

106(29.9%)

248(70.1%)

354(86.1%)

Mood stabilizer

 Yes

95(30.4%)

218(69.6%)

313(76.5%)

.52

 No

26(26.5%)

72(73.5%)

98(23.5%)

Antipsychotic& mood stabilizer

 Yes

4(26.7%)

11(73.3%)

15(3.6%)

.06

 No

117(29.5%)

279(70.5%)

396(96.4%)

Adherence

 Poor

69(59%

48(41%)

117(28.5%)

69.40

 Moderate

33(19.6%)

135(80.4%)

168(40.9%)

 High

19(15.1)

107(84.9%)

126(30.6%)

Perceived stress

 Low

31(26.3%)

87(73.7%)

118(28.7%)

.98

 Average

24(28.9%)

59(71.1%)

83(20.2%)

 High

66(31.4%)

144(68.6%)

210(51.1%)

Social support

 Poor

53(37.3%)

89(62.7%)

142(34.5%)

7.00

 Moderate

49(26.6%)

135(73.4%)

184(44.8%)

 Strong

19(22.4%)

66(77.6%)

85(20.7%)

Family related problem

 Yes

62(40%)

93(60%)

155(37.7%)

13.36

 No

59(23%)

197(77%)

256(62.3)

Current substance use

 Yes

50(42.7%)

67(57.3%)

117(28.5%)

13.92

 No

71(24.1%)

223(75.9%)

294(71.5%)

Current symptoms

Depressive

 Yes

93(47%)

105(53%)

198(48.2%)

56.51

 No

28(13.1%

185(86.9%)

213(51.8%)

Psychotic

 Yes

100(53.2%)

88(46.8%)

188(45.7%)

103.58

 No

22(9.9%)

201(90.1%)

223(54.3%)

Mania

 Yes

62(60.2%)

41(39.8%)

103(25.1%)

62.58

 No

59(19.2%)

249(80.8%)

308(74.9%)

In term of other psychiatric or neurological comorbidity 65 (15.8%) of the sample had co-morbid psychiatric or neurological disorders and 52.8% of the respondents had five or more years of morbidity.

Magnitude of aggressive behaviour

Among the total 411 participants, 121 (29.4%) had aggressive behaviour. In terms of domain, verbal aggression was the highest which was account 84 (20.4%) of the total samples while auto aggression was the lowest that was 60 (14.6%) of the total sample. aggression against property was 71 (17.5%) and physical aggression was 78 (19.0%). As a combination, 30 (7.3%) of the sample had all domain of aggression.

Concerning to their clinical variables, of the total aggressive patients 90.9% of them had previous history of aggression, 66.1% had history of physical restrain, 51.1% had high perceived stress, 52.9% were on treatment more than five years, 78.5% of were on mood stabilizer, 58.7% of were on antipsychotic medication but, 57% of them had low adherence to their medication. In terms on their current symptom, among aggressive patients, 65.3% had guilty feeling, 61.2% depressed mood, 50.2% grandiosity, 54.5% suspicious and 40.0% had hallucination symptoms.

Among 121 aggressive bipolar patients 50 (41.3%) of them use any of these substances (alcohol, smoking and khat) currently.

Multivariate analysis

After multivariate analysis of aggression in relation to all independent variables; number of episode, history of past aggression, psychotic symptoms, depressive symptoms, manic symptoms, low medication adherence, poor social support and current use of substance were found to be statistically significant (Table 3).
Table 3

factors associated with aggressive behaviour among patients with bipolar disorder attending at Amanual Mental Specialized Hospital; May, 2015

Explanatory variables

Aggressive behaviour Yes No

(Crude odd ratio) (95% CI)

Adjusted odd ratio (AOR) 95% CI

Number of episode

 One episode

19 100

1.00

1.00

 More than one episode

102 190

2.82 (1.63, 4.87)*

2.35 (1.18, 4.69)**

History of aggression

 Yes

110 222

3.06 (1.55, 6.02)*

3.72 (1.54, 8.98)**

 No

11 68

1.00

1.00

Co-morbid illness

 Yes

26 39

1.76 (1.02, 3.03)*

1.55 (0.74, 3.23)

 No

95 251

1.00

1.00

Family related problems

 Yes

62 93

2.20 (1.44, 3.43)*

1.47 (0.82, 2.66)

 No

59 197

1.00

1.00

Manic symptoms

 Yes

62 41

6.38 (3.93, 10.37)*

3.85 (2.06, 7.19)$

 No

59 249

100

1.00

Depressive symptoms

 Yes

93 105

5.85 (3.60, 9.51)*

3.63 (1.89, 6.96)$

 No

28 185

1.00

1.00

Psychotic symptoms

 Yes

100 88

10.93 (6.41, 18.62)*

5.41 (2.88, 10.1)$

No

21 202

1.00

1.00

Adherence

 Poor adherence

69 48

8.09 (4.39, 14.92)*

3.73 (1.71, 8.13)**

 Moderate adherence

33 135

1.38 (0.74, 2.55)*

1.45 (0.67, 3.12)

 Good adherence

19 107

1.00

1.00

Current use of substance

 Yes

50 67

2.34 (1.49, 3.69)*

2.17 (1.16, 4.06)**

 No

71 223

1.00

1.00

Social support

 Poor

53 87

2.07 (1.12, 3.82)*

2.99 (1.30, 6.91)**

 Moderate

49 135

1.26 (0.69, 2.31)*

1.56 (0.70, 3.47)

 Strong

19 66

1.00

1.00

*p-value < 0.05

**statistically significant at multivariate logistic regression

$p-value <0.001

Discussion

In psychopathology, aggression is the predominant symptom of many psychiatric disorders and aggressive behaviour is responsible for worsening of the morbidity of bipolar patients that cause hospitalization and poor social interaction.

The prevalence is almost similar with the study done in Australia which was 28.6% [11] but slightly higher than study results from Swedish and Nigeria, 22.2% [10], 24.5% [12] respectively. For this discrepancy; factors like methodological differences, clinical and other psycho-social factors of the study participants might be responsible.

After multivariate binary logistic regression analysis, those participants who had two or more episode had increase the risk of aggression by two times than had only one episode [AOR = 2.35 95% CI (1.18, 4.69)], which is in line with a study done in Sweden [10].

Patients who had history of past aggression were more than three times more likely to be aggressive as compared with those hadn’t past aggressive behaviour with odds of [AOR = 3.72, 95% CI (1.54, 8.98)], which coincide with Australian [11] and Sweden study [10]. This may be due to the relation between being aggressive and the expectation by experiences of this behaviour in the society or environment.

Clinical factors like, patients with depressive symptoms had more than three times likely had aggressive behaviour than those patients without depressive symptoms [AOR = 3.63, 95% CI (1.89, 6.96)], patients with psychotic symptoms had five times more likely had aggressive behaviour than patients without psychotic symptoms [AOR = 5.41, 95% CI (2.88, 10.13)]. Patients with mania symptoms had more than three times more likely aggressive behaviour than patients without mania symptoms [AOR = 3.85, 95% CI (2.06, 7.19)]. This finding was in harmonious with American study [14], Nigerian study for psychotic symptoms [12] and Australian [11] study for psychotic and mania symptoms.

Regarding to their medication adherence, patients who had low adherence to their medication had more than 3 times more likely had aggressive behaviour than patients who had high adherence [AOR = 3.73, 95% CI (1.71, 8.13)], which was in line with a study done in UK and Czech Republic that medication non-adherence was significantly associated with violent among severely mental ill patients [20, 27]. The possible explanation for this may be patients had poor adherence may not got good control for their symptoms.

Any current substance usage of (alcohol, smoking, and khat) among bipolar patients had two times more likely aggressive than patients who hadn’t use of these substances [AOR = 2.17, 95% CI (1.16, 4.06)]. Studies in Sweden, Nigeria, USA, and Czech Republic agree with this finding in which use of substances increase the impulsivity and emotionality of bipolar patients [10, 12, 17, 27]. The possible justification may be use of these substances had influence on the effect of medication and worsening of active symptoms.

Not only in patients but also in the general population use of substance like Khat shown in high proportion among individuals who show anger expression. Khat has the contributing effect for committing gender-based violent acts among general population [28, 29].

Regarding to their social support those bipolar patients who had poor social support were three times more likely had aggressive behaviour than had strong support supports [AOR = 2.99, 95% CI (1.30, 6.91)] and that may be due to lack of good care provider, attention giver that should upset the patient and ending up with aggressiveness for the surroundings.

Conclusion

Prevalence of aggressive behaviour is high among bipolar patients who attending at Amanuel Mental specialized hospital outpatient clinic. Number of episode, history of past aggression, and presence of psychotic, depressive or manic symptoms, medication adherence, social support and current use of substance were found to be significantly associated with aggressive behaviour. It is important to pay attention for those significant factors to manage and control aggressive behaviour among bipolar patients.

Limitation

This study was a cross-sectional study design that cannot show the temporal cause-effect association between factors and aggressive behaviour. Even though, each substance has its own contribution on aggressive behaviour, in this study type of substance were not assess whether it has association or has not with aggressive behaviour. This study also didn’t assess personality disorder among bipolar patients. We use the term bipolar disorder for all bipolar type (bipolar I, II, cyclothymia and others) and aggressive behaviour may different in each sub-type.

Abbreviations

AOR: 

Adjusted odd ratio

CI: 

Confidence interval

MOAS: 

Modified overt aggression scale

UK: 

United Kingdom

USA: 

United State of America

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We would like to say thanks for Amanual Mental Specialized Hospital staffs for their genuine cooperation during the study period.

Funding

Funding for this study was provided by Amanual Mental Specialized Hospital.

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article. The datasets during the current study is available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Authors’ contributions

HB organized the original investigation; coordinated the collection of data; and analysis the data. HM and TF equally contributed in the design of the study, performed the statistical analyses and drafted the manuscript. TA, TS SY and TT contributed to the statistical analyses and revision of the manuscript, but all authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Competing interests

We declare that there is no competing interest.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Ethics approval and consent to participation

Ethical approval was obtained from Ethical Review Board of University of Gondar and Amanual Mental Specialized Hospital. Written consent taken from the participants for their voluntary participation after a complete description of the study was provided to them. Confidentiality is maintained through the process.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Psychiatry Department, College of Medicine and Health Science, Bahir Dar University
(2)
Psychiatry Department, College of Medicine and Health Science, University of Gondar
(3)
Amanual Mental Specialized Hospital
(4)
Psychiatry Department, College of Medicine and Health Science, Dilla University
(5)
Felegehiwot Referral Hospital
(6)
Psychiatry Department, College of Medicine and Health Science, Haromaya University
(7)
Nursing Department, College of Medicine and Health Science, Bahir Dar University

References

  1. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, (DSM-5®). Arlington: American Psychiatric Pub; 2013.Google Scholar
  2. Mathers C, Boerma T, Ma Fat D. The global burden of disease: 2004 update. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2008. p. 2013.Google Scholar
  3. Abreu LN, Lafer B, Baca-Garcia E, Oquendo MA. Suicidal ideation and suicide attempts in bipolar disorder type I: an update for the clinician. Rev Bras Psiquiatr. 2009;31(3):271–80.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Dalton EJ, Cate‐Carter TD, Mundo E, Parikh SV, Kennedy JL. Suicide risk in bipolar patients: the role of co‐morbid substance use disorders. Bipolar Disord. 2003;5(1):58–61.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Comai S, Tau M, Gobbi G. The psychopharmacology of aggressive behavior: a translational approach: part 1: neurobiology. J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2012;32(1):83–94.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Latalova K. Bipolar disorder and aggression. Int J Clin Pract. 2009;63(6):889–99.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Volavka J. Violence in schizophrenia and bipolar disorder. Psychiatr Danub. 2013;25(1):24–33.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Bowers L, Stewart D, Papadopoulos C, Dack C, Ross J, Khanom H. Inpatient violence and aggression: a literature review. 2011.Google Scholar
  9. Nawka A, Rukavina TV, Nawková L, Jovanović N, Brborović O, Raboch J. Psychiatric disorders and aggression in the printed media: is there a link? a central European perspective. BMC psychiatry. 2012;12(1):19.Google Scholar
  10. Webb RT, Lichtenstein P, Larsson H, Geddes JR, Fazel S. Suicide, hospital- presenting suicide attempts, and criminality in bipolar disorder: examination of risk for multiple adverse outcomes. J Clin Psychiatry. 2014;75(8):809-16.Google Scholar
  11. Barlow K, Grenyer B, Ilkiw‐Lavalle O. Prevalence and precipitants of aggression in psychiatric inpatient units. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2000;34(6):967–74.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Amoo G, Fatoye FO. Aggressive behaviour and mental illness: a study of in- patients at Aro Neuropsychiatric Hospital, Abeokuta. Niger J Clin Pract. 2010;13(3):351-55.Google Scholar
  13. Krakowski M, Czobor P. Gender differences in violent behaviors: relationship to clinical symptoms and psychosocial factors. Am J Psychiatry. 2004;161:459–65.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Strakowski SM, Fleck DE, DelBello MP, Adler CM, Shear PK, Kotwal R, et al. Impulsivity across the course of bipolar disorder. Bipolar Disord. 2010;12(3):285–97.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Grunebaum MF, Galfalvy HC, Nichols CM, Caldeira NA, Sher L, Dervic K, et al. Aggression and substance abuse in bipolar disorder. Bipolar Disord. 2006;8(5p1):496–502.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Swann AC, Dougherty DM, Pazzaglia PJ, Pham M, Steinberg JL, Moeller FG. Increased impulsivity associated with severity of suicide attempt history in patients with bipolar disorder. Am J Psychiatr. 2005;162(9):1680–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Garno JL, Gunawardane N, Goldberg JF. Predictors of trait aggression in bipolar disorder. Bipolar Disord. 2008;10(2):285–92.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Ahmad A, Mazlan NH. The kind of mental health problems and it association with aggressiveness: a study on security guards. Int JPsychol Behav Sci. 2012;2(6):237–44.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Raja M, Azzoni A. Hostility and violence of acute psychiatric inpatients. Clin Pract Epidemiol Ment Health. 2005;1(1):1.Google Scholar
  20. Witt K, Van Dorn R, Fazel S. Risk factors for violence in psychosis: systematic review and meta-regression analysis of 110 studies. PloS one. 2013;8(2):e55942.Google Scholar
  21. Kay SR, Wolkenfeld F, Murrill LM. Profiles of aggression among psychiatric patients: II. Covariates and predictors. J Nerv Ment Dis. 1988;176(9):547–57.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Chukwujekwu DC, Stanley PC. The modified overt aggression scale: how valid in this environment? Niger J Med. 2008;17:153–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Morisky DE, Ang A, Krousel‐Wood M, Ward HJ. Predictive validity of a medication adherence measure in an outpatient setting. J Clin Hypertens. 2008;10(5):348–54.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Bøen H. Characteristics of senior centre users–and the impact of a group programme on social support and late-life depression. Norsk Epidemiol. 2012;22(2):261-69.Google Scholar
  25. Cohen S, Kamarck T, Mermelstein R. A global measure of perceived stress. J Health Soc Behav. 1983;24(4):385–96.Google Scholar
  26. Humeniuk R, Ali R, Babor TF, Farrell M, Formigoni ML, Jittiwutikarn J, et al. Validation of the alcohol, smoking and substance involvement screening test (ASSIST). Addiction. 2008;103(6):1039–47.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Stuart H. Violence and mental illness: an overview. World Psychiatry. 2003;2(2):121-24.Google Scholar
  28. Terasaki DJ, Gelaye B, Berhane Y, Williams MA. Anger expression, violent behavior, and symptoms of depression among male college students in Ethiopia. BMC Public Health. 2009;9(1):1.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Philpart M, Goshu M, Gelaye B, Williams MA, Berhane Y. Prevalence and risk factors of gender-based violence committed by male college students in Awassa, Ethiopia. Violence Vict. 2009;24(1):122–36.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2016

Advertisement