Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Gender differences in factors associated with smartphone addiction: a cross-sectional study among medical college students

BMC PsychiatryBMC series – open, inclusive and trusted201717:341

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-017-1503-z

Received: 23 March 2017

Accepted: 2 October 2017

Published: 10 October 2017

Abstract

Background

Smartphones are becoming increasingly indispensable in everyday life for most undergraduates in China, and this has been associated with problematic use or addiction. The aim of the current study was to investigate the prevalence of smartphone addiction and the associated factors in male and female undergraduates.

Methods

This cross-sectional study was conducted in 2016 and included 1441 undergraduate students at Wannan Medical College, China. The Smartphone Addiction Scale short version (SAS-SV) was used to assess smartphone addiction among the students, using accepted cut-offs. Participants’ demographic, smartphone usage, and psycho-behavioral data were collected. Multivariate logistic regression models were used to seek associations between smartphone addiction and independent variables among the males and females, separately.

Results

The prevalence of smartphone addiction among participants was 29.8% (30.3% in males and 29.3% in females). Factors associated with smartphone addiction in male students were use of game apps, anxiety, and poor sleep quality. Significant factors for female undergraduates were use of multimedia applications, use of social networking services, depression, anxiety, and poor sleep quality.

Conclusions

Smartphone addiction was common among the medical college students investigated. This study identified associations between smartphone usage, psycho-behavioral factors, and smartphone addiction, and the associations differed between males and females. These results suggest the need for interventions to reduce smartphone addiction among undergraduate students.

Keywords

Smartphone addiction Problematic smartphone use Sleep quality Depression Anxiety

Background

Smartphones are no longer considered simply as “mobile phones”, but real-time information providers and powerful portable computers. This is because these portable devices provides a variety of functions such as phone, camera, multimedia player, internet browser, navigation system, and e-mail service as well as facilitate social networking and game playing. As smartphones were developed in recent years, China became the largest market for these devices, and the market continues to grow at an astonishing pace. According to China’s 39th Statistical Report on Internet Development, 695 million Chinese individuals were accessing the internet through smartphones as of December 2016 [1]. Despite the advantages associated with smartphone use, such as enhanced social networking, increased productivity, and more dynamic and immediate ways of living and working, prior research suggests that many people overuse their phones in ways that interfere with their daily lives [2, 3], safety [4], health [57], and physical health-related problems such as blurred vision and pain in the wrists or neck [8]. Moreover, smartphone overuse may lead to mental or behavioral problems, such as changes in attitude towards school or work, reduction of social interaction in real life, and disorders [9].

Griffiths operationally defined technological addiction as a type of non-chemical behavioral addiction that involves human-machine interaction [10]. Gambling addiction, which is the most well-known behavioral addiction, has been categorized within “substance-related and addictive disorders” in the latest version of Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5) [11]. Internet gaming disorder has also been listed in the research criteria of the DSM-5 [11]. Several self-reported questionnaires have been developed to assess problematic smartphone use or “addiction” in recent years [1214]. Generally, smartphone addiction consists of four main components: compulsive phone use, behaviors such as repeated checking for messages or updates; tolerance, longer and more intense bouts of use; withdrawal, feelings of agitation or distress without the phone; and functional impairment, interference with other life activities and face to face social relationships [15]. All these are very similar to the characteristics of internet addiction [16].

To date, little is known about factors associated with problematic or addictive smartphone usage. In a community study of young adults, high mobile phone usage was associated with subsequent stress, sleep difficulties, and depression [16]. In another study, 362 employed adults were tested for associations between age, self-esteem, extraversion, emotional stability, depression on the one hand, and impulse control in relation to different levels of addictive and problematic mobile phone use on the other [17], and the study found that age, depression, and extraversion were predictors of higher scores on level of problematic mobile phone use. In another study conducted on smartphone users, anxiety and depression were found to be higher in groups that over-used smartphones than in normal user groups [7]. Similarly, it has been reported that problematic use of the internet is associated with sleep problems, such as subjective insomnia and poor sleep quality [18, 19].

When compared to older social groups, undergraduate students are more likely to make heavy use of smartphones and hence are potentially vulnerable to smartphone addiction [20]. As young people, undergraduates are digital natives who have grown up in the smartphone age and have integrated this appliance into their lifestyle [21]. Tao et al. [22] assessed problematic mobile phone use in a large random sample of Chinese adolescents in 2012 and reported that the prevalence of problematic mobile phone use among Chinese adolescents was 26.2%. Another study reported that the prevalence of problematic smartphone use among Chinese undergraduates was 21.3% [23]. Although a previous study indicated differences in smartphone addiction by gender [24], there are limited data in the literature regarding gender differences in the prevalence of smartphone addiction or the associated factors in a large population of Chinese undergraduate students. The present study was the first to investigate the relationship between smartphone usage and psycho-behavioral–related variables associated with smartphone addiction in male and female undergraduate students.

Methods

Participants and procedures

This cross-sectional study was conducted in September 2016 to analyze factors associated with smartphone addiction among medical college students at Wannan Medical College, China. The study was reviewed and approved by the Ethics Committee of Wannan Medical College. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants prior to completion of the questionnaire survey. Participation in the study was not compulsory: the students were informed that they were not obliged to participate, that all responses were anonymous, and that they were free to refuse to answer any questions. A total of 1556 students were randomly selected as the study sample, and 115 (7.4%) were excluded from the analysis because they failed to complete the questionnaires in its entirety. Respondents completed a validated screening tool for smartphone addiction and provided information on socio-demographics, smartphone use characteristics, depression, anxiety, and sleep quality. All questionnaires were in the self-report format. To avoid typing errors, we entered information into all questionnaires using a double-entry strategy in EpiData, version 3.1 (EpiData Association, Odense, Funen, Denmark).

Measurement

The information collected included basic socio-demographic data, such as gender, age, academic year, residence (urban/rural), and monthly cost of living. Specific information regarding smartphone use included the age at which they obtained their first smartphone, the most-often-used functions (phone call/message, games, video watching/listening to music, social networking services, internet surfing/e-book reading, and others), daily smartphone use time, frequency of replacement of their smartphones, and monthly smartphone bill.

Smartphone addiction was measured using the Smartphone Addiction Scale short version (SAS-SV). The SAS-SV is a validated scale that contains 10 items rated on a dimensional scale (1 “strongly disagree” to 6 “strongly agree”) [14]. The total score ranges from 10 to 60, with the highest score representing the maximum presence of “smartphone addiction” in the past year. The original SAS-SV showed content and concurrent validity and internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha: 0.91). Smartphone addiction cut-off values of ≥ 31 and ≥ 33 for male and female participants, respectively, were applied as suggested by Kwon et al. [14].

Anxiety symptoms were measured with the 20-item Self-Rating Anxiety Scale (SAS) developed by Zung [25]. A Chinese version of the SAS was used in the present survey. The scale has been proven to correspond well with the assessment of anxiety and has been found to be reliable in epidemiological surveys of Chinese populations [26, 27]. Each item contains four options that describe how often the respondents ha each feeling in the previous week on a four-point Likert scale ranging from “none or a little of the time (less than once day)” (coded as 1) to “most or all the time (5–7 days)” (coded as 4). The total score on the SAS was calculated, with higher scores indicating a higher degree of anxiety. According to previous studies of the Chinese population [26, 27], anxiety was defined in this study by a total raw score above 40.

Depressive symptoms were measured with the 20-item Chinese version of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) [28]. This scale is widely used for assessment of depressive symptoms in normal and clinical samples from different ages, genders, and nationalities [29, 30]. Participants were asked to rate the occurrence of each symptom in the previous week on a scale ranging from 1 (rarely) to 4 (most of the time). Total scores ranged from 20 to 80, with higher scores indicating higher levels of depressive symptoms. Scores of 36 or higher are considered indicative of depression. The Chinese version of the CES-D exhibits high degrees of reliability and validity [31].

Sleep quality was assessed using Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) [32], which is a widely used 19-item self-report questionnaire that measures subjective sleep quality. The 19 items are grouped into scores with seven components: subjective sleep quality, sleep latency, sleep duration, sleep efficiency, sleep disturbances, use of sleep medication, and daytime dysfunction. The scores of these components are added to a global PSQI score with a range of 0 to 21, with higher scores indicating worse sleep quality. PSQI scores above 5 were taken as abnormal. The Chinese version of PSQI developed by Liu et al. [33] is widely used in different populations, and it has good reliability for assessment of undergraduate students [34, 35].

Statistical analysis

Descriptive analysis was used to examine the demographic and psychological behavior characteristics of the study participants. Univariate analysis by chi-square tests and multivariate analysis by binary logistic regression analysis were used to identify factors related to smartphone addiction in different genders. As suggested by Hosmer, Lemeshow and Sturdivant (2013, pages 89–94), variables that had a significance level of p < 0.20 in the univariate analysis were considered potential factors for inclusion in the multivariate models [36]. Final multivariate models were determined by performing stepwise backward elimination to remove covariates not significant at the p < 0.05 level. The adjusted odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were reported. Data entry was done in Epi Info 3.1. The database was then exported to SPSS 20.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) for analysis. Values of p < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Results

Gender-related differences in basic characteristics of the study participants

The final sample included 1441 undergraduate students. Out of the 1441 smartphone users, 696 (48.3%) were male, while 745 (51.7%) were female. They were aged 17– 26 years (mean age, 19.72 ± 1.43 years). The results indicated that smartphone addiction was present in 429 (29.8%) of the 1441 participants, and the prevalence of smartphone addiction was 30.3% in males, and 29.3% in females. Table 1 presents the gender differences in the basic characteristics of the study participants.
Table 1

Basic gender differences in characteristics of the study participants [n (%)]

 

Total (N = 1441)

Male (n = 696)

Female (n = 745)

p

Age (years)

 ≤ 19

664 (46.1)

306 (44.0)

358 (48.1)

.120

 ≥ 20

777 (53.9)

390 (56.0)

387 (51.9)

 

Residential source

 Rural

928 (64.4)

469 (67.4)

459 (61.6)

.022

 Urban

513 (35.6)

227 (32.6)

286 (38.4)

 

Monthly cost of living

 ≤ 800 RMB

494 (34.3)

212 (30.5)

282 (37.9)

.008

 800–1200 RBM

714 (49.5)

371 (53.3)

343 (46.0)

 

 ≥ 1200 RMB

233 (16.2)

113 (16.2)

120 (16.1)

 

Most personally relevant smartphone function

 Phone calls/Text message

505 (35.0)

235 (33.9)

270 (36.2)

.000

 Smartphone gaming

60 (4.2)

49 (7.0)

11 (1.5)

 

Multimedia applications (Watching videos/Listening to music)

230 (16.0)

108 (15.4)

122 (16.3)

 

 Social networking services

483 (33.5)

208 (29.9)

275 (36.9)

 

 Internet surfing/reading

92 (6.4)

57 (8.1)

35 (4.7)

 

 Others

71 (4.9)

39 (5.6)

32 (4.3)

 

Smart phone addiction

 Negative

1012 (70.2)

485 (69.7)

527 (70.7)

.662

 Positive

429 (29.8)

211 (30.3)

218 (29.3)

 

Sleep quality

 Good sleep quality

929 (64.5)

467 (67.1)

462 (62.0)

.044

 Poor sleep quality

512 (35.5)

229 (32.9)

283 (38.0)

 

Anxiety

 Negative

1301 (90.3)

607 (87.2)

694 (93.2)

.000

 Positive

140 (9.7)

89 (12.8)

51 (6.8)

 

Depressive

 Negative

1076 (74.7)

501 (72.0)

575 (77.2)

.023

 Positive

365 (25.3)

195 (28.0)

170 (22.8)

 

Univariate analysis of factors associated with smartphone addiction between genders

Table 2 presents the univariate analyses of potential factors related to smartphone addiction. Older age, playing of smartphone games, smartphone media applications, poor sleep quality, depression, and anxiety were associated with smartphone addiction in males. In females, older age, higher monthly cost for living, less use of phone calling/messaging, use of social networking service applications, poor sleep quality, depression, and anxiety were associated with smartphone addiction.
Table 2

Univariate analysis of the factors associated with smartphone addiction between the two genders [n(%)]

 

Males

Females

Smartphone addiction positive

Smartphone addiction negative

OR (95% CI)

p

Smartphone addiction positive

Smartphone addiction negative

OR (95% CI)

p

Age (years)

 ≤ 19

80(26.1)

226(73.9)

Ref.

 

92(25.7)

266(74.3)

Ref.

 

 ≥ 20

131(33.6)

259(66.4)

1.43 (1.03-1.99)

.034

126(32.6)

261(67.4)

1.40 (1.02-1.92)

.040

Residential source

 Rural

141(30.1)

328(69.9)

Ref.

 

127(27.7)

332(72.3)

Ref.

 

 Urban

70(30.8)

157(69.2)

1.04 (0.74-1.46)

.835

91(31.8)

195(68.2)

1.22 (0.88-1.68)

.226

Monthly cost for living

 ≤ 800 RMB

60(28.3)

152(71.7)

Ref.

 

74(26.2)

208(73.8)

Ref.

 

 800–1200 RBM

109(29.4)

262(70.6)

1.05 (0.73-1.53)

.783

96(28.0)

247(72.0)

1.09 (0.77-1.56)

.625

 ≥ 1200 RMB

42(37.2)

71(62.8)

1.50 (0.92-2.43)

.101

48(40.0)

72(60.0)

1.87 (1.19-2.94)

.006

Phone calls/Text message

 Not main function

144(31.2)

317(68.8)

Ref.

 

163(34.3)

312(65.7)

Ref.

 

 Main function

67(28.5)

168(71.5)

0.88 (0.62-1.24)

.459

55(20.4)

215(79.6)

0.49 (0.35-0.70)

.000

Smartphone gaming

 Not main function

188(29.1)

459(70.9)

Ref.

 

216(29.4)

518(70.6)

Ref.

 

 Main function

23(46.9)

26(53.1)

2.16 (1.20-3.88)

.009

2(18.2)

9(81.8)

0.53 (0.11-2.49)

.631

Multimedia applications (Watching videos/Listening to music)

 Not main function

189(32.1)

399(67.9)

Ref.

 

174(27.9)

449(72.1)

Ref.

 

 Main function

22(20.4)

86(79.6)

0.54 (0.33-0.89)

.014

44(36.1)

78(63.9)

1.46 (0.97-2.19)

.071

Social networking services

 Not main function

139(28.5)

349(71.5)

Ref.

 

109(23.2)

361(76.8)

Ref.

 

 Main function

72(34.6)

136(65.4)

1.33 (0.94-1.88)

.107

109(39.6)

166(60.4)

2.18 (1.58-3.00)

.000

Internet surfing/reading

 Not main function

198(31.0)

441(69.0)

Ref.

 

211(29.7)

499(70.3)

Ref.

 

 Main function

13(22.8)

44(77.2)

0.66 (0.35-1.25)

.198

7(20.0)

28(80.0)

0.59 (0.25-1.38)

.217

Others

 Not main function

200(30.4)

457(69.6)

Ref.

 

211(29.6)

502(70.4)

Ref.

 

 Main function

11(28.2)

28(71.8)

0.90 (0.44-1.84)

.768

7(21.9)

25(78.1)

0.67 (0.28-1.56)

.348

Sleep quality

 Good sleep quality

98(21.0)

369(79.0)

Ref.

 

98(21.2)

364(78.8)

Ref.

 

 Poor sleep quality

113(49.3)

116(50.7)

3.67 (2.61-5.16)

.000

120(42.4)

163(57.6)

2.73 (1.98-3.78)

.000

Anxiety

 Negative

165(27.2)

442(72.8)

Ref.

 

187(26.9)

507(73.1)

Ref.

 

 Positive

46(51.7)

43(48.3)

2.87 (1.82-4.51)

.000

31(60.8)

20(39.2)

4.20 (2.34-7.56)

.000

Depressive

 Negative

127(25.3)

374(74.7)

Ref.

 

142(24.7)

433(75.3)

Ref.

 

 Positive

84(43.1)

111(56.9)

2.23 (1.57-3.16)

.000

76(44.7)

94(55.3)

2.47 (1.73-3.52)

.000

Multivariate logistic analysis of factors associated with smartphone addiction

Multivariate binary logistic regression models were used to identify the factors associated with smartphone addiction in males and females, separately. For the 696 male students, the following variables were significant factors associated with smartphone addiction: smartphone games (aOR = 2.27; 95% CI: 1.17 – 4.42); PSQI (aOR = 3.19; 95% CI: 2.23 – 4.58); and SAS (aOR = 1.78; 95% CI: 1.09 – 2.89). For the 745 female students, the following variables were significant factors associated with smartphone addiction: multimedia applications (aOR = 2.22; 95% CI: 1.37 – 3.59); social networking applications (aOR = 2.63; 95% CI: 1.81 – 3.81); PSQI (aOR = 2.12; 95% CI: 1.50 – 2.99); SAS (aOR = 2.31; 95% CI: 1.18 – 4.51); and SDS (aOR = 1.84; 95% CI: 1.21 – 2.79). The corresponding results are presented in Tables 3 and 4.
Table 3

Multivariate logistic analysis of factors associated with smartphone addiction in males

 

aOR (95% CI)

p

Main function is smartphone gaming (vs. main function is not smart phone gaming)

2.27 (1.17-4.42)

.015

Poor sleep quality (vs. good sleep quality)

3.19 (2.23-4.58)

.000

Anxiety positive (vs. anxiety negative)

1.78 (1.09-2.89)

.020

Notes: aOR djusted Odds Ratio, CI Confidence Interval. Multivariate binary logistic regression model adjusted for age, residential, and monthly cost

Table 4

Multivariate logistic analysis of factors associated with smartphone addiction in females

 

aOR (95% CI)

p

Main function is multimedia applications (vs. main function is not multimedia applications)

2.22 (1.37-3.59)

.001

Main function is social networking services (vs. main function is not social networking services)

2.63 (1.81-3.81)

.000

Poor sleep quality (vs. good sleep quality)

2.12 (1.50-2.99)

.000

Anxiety positive (vs. anxiety negative)

2.31 (1.18-4.51)

.015

Depressive positive (vs. depressive negative)

1.84 (1.21-2.79)

.004

Notes: aOR Adjusted Odds Ratio, CI Confidence Interval. Multivariate binary logistic regression model adjusted for age, residential, and monthly cost

Discussion

The prevalence of smartphone addiction in this study (29.8%), as measured with the same SAS, was higher than that in previous studies conducted in South Korea [14] and in Western Europe [37, 38]. The prevalence of smartphone addiction in junior high school students in South Korea was 24.8% [14], while the prevalence rates of smartphone addiction in university students and staff in Spain and Belgium were 12.8% and 21.5%, respectively [37]. The prevalence of smartphone addiction in a sample from a Swiss vocational school was 16.9% [38]. Measurements carried out with different scales in a study in China showed that the prevalence of smartphone-associated problems in undergraduates was 21.3% [23]. Another study reported a 26.2% prevalence level among Chinese adolescents [22], while a 19.1% prevalence has been linked to high-risk smartphone users among Chinese international students in Korea [39]. These discrepancies could be due to the different instruments and classification methods used, and also differences among the participants in the different studies. Yet, the high prevalence rate identified in the current study is an indication of potential public health concern posed by smartphone use among students at the medical college studied.

The results of this study showed no significant gender differences in the prevalence of smartphone addiction (30.3% in males, 29.3% in females, p > 0.05). This is similar to the results obtained in some previous investigations [8]. However, some studies have reported that female participants have a higher prevalence of smartphone addiction than males [7, 24, 40]. A study conducted in South Korea suggested that the female participants were more aware of their addiction based on their higher self-reporting scores [41]. Indeed, Demirci reported that the mean SAS score of female students was significantly higher than that of male students [7]. In the present study, how smartphones were used differed between the two genders. Male students were more likely to play games, watch mobile phone videos, and listen to music, whereas female students were more inclined to use the mobile phone communication functions and social networking services. A study carried out by Roberts et al. [42] found that the most problematic applications are voice calls, text messages, and social networks. For females, the cell phone is a means of social contact, in which messaging and social networks play prominent roles, while for males, a more diversified type of usage was observed, involving text messages, voice conversations, and gaming applications [24]. There is still a need for further studies to unravel the inconsistent prevalence of smartphone addiction in males and females.

There was some evidence that smartphone overuse was associated with various psychological and behavioral problems, such as depression, anxiety, and sleep disturbance. However, the nature of the association was unclear. Smartphone use could function as an experiential avoidance strategy to deflect aversive emotional content [43]. It has been found that depressed individuals use their smartphones as a coping strategy to deal with their negative emotions [6]. However, other evidence suggests that excessive smartphone use can trigger psychopathology and sleep disturbances [17, 44]. Excessive smartphone use at night could keep one up late, thus impairing sleep and influencing stress and depression [44]. It has been reported that smartphone overuse may lead to depression and/or anxiety, which can in turn result in sleep problems [7]. Other evidence suggests a bidirectional relationship, whereby excessive smartphone use drives psychopathology, and psychopathology further drives problematic use [45, 46]. The findings of the present study are consistent with those of previous studies with respect to the over-use of smartphones and its relationship to depression, anxiety, and poor sleep quality.

In the present study, some smartphone applications and psycho-behavioral factors were associated with smartphone addiction. Playing smartphone games was a predictor of smartphone addiction for males, whereas use of multimedia and social networking applications were predictors for females. Although the gender difference may only reflect preferences for smartphone apps, the findings indicate the need for gender-targeted prevention and intervention strategies to reduce smartphone addiction. Regarding psycho-behavioral factors, poor sleep quality and anxiety were associated with smartphone addiction in both males and females, but depression was only related in females. It is probable that depression was more prevalent in female students than male students in the present study, as the gender imbalance in depression is described as one of the most robust findings in epidemiological research [47]. Biological and psychosocial factors are proposed to justify the more common onset of depression in females. The effect of sex steroids on the maturating hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis might increase female sensitivity to stress, whereas androgens appear to play a protective role in males [48]. Psychosocial factors include gender differences in stress coping, gender-specific expectations and differences in social cognitive function, with females presenting a greater sensitivity to rejection [49].

Despite the large sample size, the present study has several limitations that should be taken into consideration when interpreting the results. First, the data were cross-sectional, which limits the ability to draw causal inferences, particularly those concerning direction of association between smartphone addiction and risk factors of psychological behavior. A second limitation is the fact that the participants were all medical college students; this may limit the generalization of the present results to other at-risk groups. Thirdly, functional impairments such as blurred vision and pain in the wrists or necks of participants were not investigated here. Thus, generalizing these results to a clinical setting might prove difficult. Lastly, there may be risks and protective factors beyond those measured in the present study, some of which may drive overlap between the measured variables.

Conclusions

The present study found widespread smartphone addiction among medical college students, which suggests that smartphone addiction has become a public health issue in China. The study also found that playing games on smartphones predicted addiction for male students, whereas uses of multimedia and social networking applications were predictors for females. This study suggests that smartphone addiction may result in psychological and behavioral problems, such as depression, anxiety, and poor sleep quality, and females who scored at the addiction level were more likely to be depressed than males. Considering the gender differences in smartphone addiction highlighted by the present study, targeted prevention and intervention strategies based on a multi-component strategy to reduce this behavioral problem are recommended.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

This study was supported by the Key Project of Education Department of Anhui Province (SK2016A0946). The funders had no role in the design of the study nor the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Authors’ contributions

BFC and YJC designed the study and wrote the protocol. XY and LLW managed the summaries of previous related work. SSD undertook the statistical analysis and wrote the first draft of the manuscript. LD participated in critical revision of manuscript drafts. All authors contributed to and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was reviewed and approved by the Ethics Committee of Wannan Medical College, China. All participants were informed of the purpose of the study and gave their oral consent before the investigation.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
School of Public Health, Wannan Medical College

References

  1. China Internet Network Information Center. China’s 39th statistical report on internet development. In: official statistics for internet development 2016. http://cnnic.cn/hlwfzyj/hlwxzbg/hlwtjbg/201701/P020170123364672657408.pdf. Accessed 15 Jan 2017.
  2. Clayton RB, Leshner G, Almond A. The extended iSelf: the impact of iPhone separation on cognition, emotion, and. Physiology. 2015;20(2):119–35.Google Scholar
  3. Cheever NA, Rosen LD, Carrier LM, Chavez A. Out of sight is not out of mind: the impact of restricting wireless mobile device use on anxiety levels among low, moderate and high users. Comput Hum Behav. 2014;37(37):290–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Cazzulino F, Burke RV, Muller V, Arbogast H, Upperman JS. Cell phones and young drivers: a systematic review regarding the association between psychological factors and prevention. Traffic Inj Prev. 2014;15(3):234–42.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Demirci K, Akgonul M, Akpinar A. Relationship of smartphone use severity with sleep quality, depression, and anxiety in university students. J Behav Addict. 2015;4(2):85–92.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Kim J, Seo M, David P. Alleviating depression only to become problematic mobile phone users: can face-to-face communication be the antidote? Comput Hum Behav. 2015;51(PA):440–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Demirci K, Akgönül M, Akpinar A. Relationship of smartphone use severity with sleep quality, depression, and anxiety in university students. J Behav Addict. 2015;4(2):85–92.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Kwon M, Lee JY, Won WY, Park JW, Min JA, Hahn C, Gu X, Choi JH, Kim DJ. Development and validation of a smartphone addiction scale (SAS). PLoS One. 2013;8(2):e56936.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Kuss DJ, Griffiths MD, Karila L, Billieux J. Internet addiction: a systematic review of epidemiological research for the last decade. Curr Pharm Des. 2014;20(25):4026–52.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Griffiths M. Gambling on the internet: a brief note. J Gambl Stud. 1996;12(4):471–3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Washington DC. APA: diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. 5th ed; 2013.Google Scholar
  12. Lin YH, Pan YC, Lin SH, Chen SH. Development of short-form and screening cutoff point of the Smartphone Addiction Inventory (SPAI-SF). Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2017;26(2):e1525.Google Scholar
  13. Foerster M, Roser K, Schoeni A, Röösli M. Problematic mobile phone use in adolescents: derivation of a short scale MPPUS-10. Int J Public Health. 2015;60(2):277–86.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Kwon M, Kim D, Cho H, Yang S. The Smartphone addiction scale: development and validation of a short version for adolescents. PLoS One. 2013;8(12):e83558.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Lin YH, Chiang CL, Lin PH, Chang LR, Ko CH, Lee YH, Lin SH. Proposed diagnostic criteria for Smartphone addiction. PLoS One. 2016;11(11):e163010.Google Scholar
  16. Block JJ. Issues for DSM-V: internet addiction. Am J Psychiatry. 2008;165(3):306–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Thomee S, Harenstam A, Hagberg M. Mobile phone use and stress, sleep disturbances, and symptoms of depression among young adults--a prospective cohort study. BMC Public Health. 2011;11:66.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  18. Mohammadbeigi A, Absari R, Valizadeh F, Saadati M, Sharifimoghadam S, Ahmadi A, Mokhtari M, Ansari H. Sleep quality in medical students; the impact of over-use of mobile cell-phone and social networks. J Res Health Sci. 2016;16(1):46–50.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Lam LT. Risk factors of internet addiction and the health effect of internet addiction on adolescents: a systematic review of longitudinal and prospective studies. Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2014;16(11):508.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Smetaniuk P. A preliminary investigation into the prevalence and prediction of problematic cell phone use. J Behav Addict. 2014;3(1):41–53.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  21. Haverila M. Cell phone usage and broad feature preferences: a study among Finnish undergraduate students. Telemat Inform. 2013;30(2):177–88.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Tao S, Wu X, Wan Y, Zhang S, Hao J, Tao F. Interactions of problematic mobile phone use and psychopathological symptoms with unintentional injuries: a school-based sample of Chinese adolescents. BMC Public Health. 2016;16:88.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  23. Long J, Liu TQ, Liao YH, Qi C, He HY, Chen SB, Billieux J. Prevalence and correlates of problematic smartphone use in a large random sample of Chinese undergraduates. BMC Psychiatry. 2016;16(1):408.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  24. De-Sola Gutiérrez J, Rodríguez De Fonseca F, Rubio G. Cell-phone addiction: a review. Front Psychiatry. 2016;7:175.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  25. Zung WW. A rating instrument for anxiety disorders. Psychosomatics. 1971;12(6):371–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Liu XC, Oda S, Peng X, Asai K. Life events and anxiety in Chinese medical students. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 1997;32(2):63–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. HH H, Li G, Arao T. The association of family social support, depression, anxiety and self-efficacy with specific hypertension self-care behaviours in Chinese local community. J Hum Hypertens. 2015;29(3):198–203.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Radloff LS. The CES-D scale a self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Appl Psychol Meas. 1977;1(3):385–401.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Ling Y, He Y, Wei Y, Cen W, Zhou Q, Zhong M. Intrinsic and extrinsic goals as moderators of stress and depressive symptoms in Chinese undergraduate students: a multi-wave longitudinal study. BMC Psychiatry. 2016;16:138.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  30. Lou Z, Li Y, Yang Y, Wang L, Yang J. Affects of anxiety and depression on health-related quality of life among patients with benign breast lumps diagnosed via Ultrasonography in China. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2015;12(9):10587–601.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  31. Yang HJ, Soong WT, Kuo PH, Chang HL, Chen WJ. Using the CES-D in a two-phase survey for depressive disorders among nonreferred adolescents in Taipei: a stratum-specific likelihood ratio analysis. J Affect Disord. 2004;82(3):419–30.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Buysse DJ, Reynolds CR, Monk TH, Berman SR, Kupfer DJ. The Pittsburgh sleep quality index: a new instrument for psychiatric practice and research. Psychiatry Res. 1989;28(2):193–213.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Liu XC, Tang MQ, Hu L, Wang AZ, Wu HX, Zhao GF, Gao CN, Li WS: Reliability and validity of Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index. Chin J Psychiatry. 1996;29(2):103–107.Google Scholar
  34. DG QI, Liu R, Wu X, Pan J, Deng JB, Wang AG. Investigation on sleeping quality of university students and it’s influential factors. Modern Prevent Med. 2007;34(5):875–7.Google Scholar
  35. Shi SP, Xiong DY, Yan QR. Sleep quality among college students and associatedfactors. Chin J Sch Health. 2013;34(12):1462–4.Google Scholar
  36. Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S, Sturdivant RX. Applied logistic regression. 3rd ed. New Jersey: Wiley; 2013.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Lopez-Fernandez O. Short version of the Smartphone addiction scale adapted to Spanish and French: towards a cross-cultural research in problematic mobile phone use. Addict Behav. 2017;64:275–80.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Haug S, Castro RP, Kwon M, Filler A, Kowatsch T, Schaub MP. Smartphone use and smartphone addiction among young people in Switzerland. J Behav Addict. 2015;4(4):299–307.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  39. Kim S, Kim J, Jee Y. Relationship between smartphone addiction and physical activity in Chinese international students in Korea. J Behav Addict. 2015;4(3):200–5.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  40. Tavakolizadeh J, Atarodi A, Ahmadpour S, Pourgheisar A. The prevalence of excessive mobile phone use and its relation with mental health status and demographic factors among the students of Gonabad University of Medical Sciences in 2011-2012. Razavi Int J Med. 2014;2(1):59–72.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  41. Lee KE, Kim SH, Ha TY, Yoo YM, Han JJ, Jung JH, Jang JY. Dependency on Smartphone use and its association with anxiety in Korea. Public Health Rep. 2016;131(3):411–9.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  42. Roberts J, Yaya L, Manolis C. The invisible addiction: cell-phone activities and addiction among male and female college students. J Behav Addict. 2014;3(4):254–65.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  43. Machell KA, Goodman FR, Kashdan TB. Experiential avoidance and well-being: a daily diary analysis. Cogn Emot. 2015;29(2):351–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Lemola S, Perkinson-Gloor N, Brand S, Dewald-Kaufmann JF, Grob A. Adolescents’ electronic media use at night, sleep disturbance, and depressive symptoms in the smartphone age. J Youth Adolesc. 2015;44(2):405–18.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. van den Eijnden RJ, Meerkerk GJ, Vermulst AA, Spijkerman R, Engels RC. Online communication, compulsive internet use, and psychosocial well-being among adolescents: a longitudinal study. Dev Psychol. 2008;44(3):655–65.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Yen JY, Cheng-Fang Y, Chen CS, Chang YH, Yeh YC, Ko CH. The bidirectional interactions between addiction, behaviour approach and behaviour inhibition systems among adolescents in a prospective study. Psychiatry Res. 2012;200(2-3):588–92.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Kuehner C. Gender differences in unipolar depression: an update of epidemiological findings and possible explanations. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2003;108(3):163–74.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Naninck EF, Lucassen PJ, Bakker J. Sex differences in adolescent depression: do sex hormones determine vulnerability? J Neuroendocrinol. 2011;23(5):383–92.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Chaplin TM, Gillham JE, Seligman ME. Gender, anxiety, and depressive symptoms: a longitudinal study of early adolescents. J Early Adolesc. 2009;29(2):307–27.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2017