Skip to main content
Download PDF

Risk and protective factors of depression in the general population during the COVID-19 epidemic in Korea

BMC Psychiatry volume 21, Article number: 445 (2021) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

The risk of depression has risen in the general population during the COVID-19 epidemic. This study was conducted to explore risk and protective factors associated with depression among the general population uninfected by COVID-19.

Methods

A cross-sectional study was conducted with 1,500 representative South Korean citizens aged 19–65 years through an anonymous online survey. Depression was defined as a Patient Health Questionnaire-9 score of 10 or higher. Other questionnaires included one measuring psycho-behavioural and social changes, and stress, due to COVID-19, a six-item version of the Gratitude Questionnaire (GQ-6), and a three-item version of the UCLA loneliness scale.

Results

Of the 1492 participants not infected by COVID-19, 312 (20.9%) exhibited depression. Multiple logistic regression analysis revealed that depression was positively associated with COVID-19-related stress and psycho-behavioural variables such as disturbances in eating and sleeping, younger age, smoking, underlying mental illness, and loneliness scale scores. In contrast, exercise three or more times per week and GQ-6 scale scores were inversely associated with depression.

Conclusion

During the COVID-19 pandemic, maintaining daily routines including eating, sleeping, and regular exercise and focusing on gratitude may be important for the prevention of depression. In addition, more attention should be paid to vulnerable populations, including young people, those with mental illnesses, and smokers, who might be more susceptible to depression.

Peer Review reports

Background

The Corona Virus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has drastically changed our society and infiltrated every aspect of our daily lives [1]. Long-lasting social distancing and shrinkage of economic activity tend to lead to depression [2]. The risk of depression has risen in the general population as well as in those with COVID-19 infection [3, 4]. Most people, regardless of their viral infection status, have been affected by the psychosocial changes associated with the COVID-19 pandemic [5]. Depression adversely affects individuals’ mental and physical health and the social and financial welfare of the individual and society [6]. Thus, the higher prevalence of depression during this pandemic may be a crucial component of the increased socioeconomic burden imposed by COVID-19.

The causes of depressive disorder are generally heterogeneous. Various psychosocial factors, many associated with the pandemic, are likely related to the increased risk for depression: female gender, unmarried status, lower income, and negative economic impacts [3, 6, 7]. Underlying physical and psychiatric illness, emotional stress, and loneliness are also associated with increased risk for depression [6, 8]. In addition, lifestyle disturbances such as changes in sleep and nutrition, can increase depression risk [9].

In contrast, active coping strategies with positive emotions and social support have been reported as protective factors [10]. Positive psychological factors, including optimism, altruism, and gratitude, may reduce perceived stress and heighten the sense of well-being [11, 12]. In a natural disaster or pandemic, altruistic acceptance can help prevent negative impacts on mental health and depression [13]. Gratitude is associated with positive reframing and emotions that are, in turn, associated with fewer symptoms of depression [11, 14, 15]. Gratitude has also been reported to protect against depressive symptoms following traumatic events [16]. In our previous investigation of the association of gratitude with perceived stress and burnout among male firefighters, gratitude independently protected against stress and burnout [17]. Because the COVID-19 pandemic is a community disaster with many unwanted social restrictions, we hypothesised that gratitude might be important in protecting against depression. Although gratitude has been reported to have a positive impact on the mental health of service providers [18], few studies have investigated its protective effects on depression in the general population during the COVID-19 pandemic. Regular physical exercise can also provide protection against future depression [19]. However, restrictions on activities and social interactions during the COVID-19 pandemic have exacerbated already-stressful socioenvironmental conditions, enhancing risk factors and hindering protective factors against depression.

Insufficient evidence has been available regarding various psychosocial factors associated with depression among the general population in COVID-19-impacted societies. This study investigated the risk and protective factors associated with depression in the general population uninfected by COVID-19. In Korea, after the first patient with COVID-19 was identified on 20 January 2020, the number of confirmed patients began to increase sharply from mid-February. The number of confirmed cases in Korea was ranked second highest in the world at that time. The Korean Government declared a pandemic in late February. Although Korea did not undergo lockdown, the start of the school year was postponed, most social events were cancelled, and the general population was asked to continue social distancing. By the end of April, when this survey began, the number of confirmed cases exceeded 10,000 nationwide (ranked 30th highest worldwide), and the first wave of the COVID-19 outbreak, throughout which social distancing had been maintained, had passed.

Our hypothesis was as follows. Poor socioeconomic status and COVID-19-related stress caused by long-lasting social distancing may be associated with an increased risk for depression. In addition, despite the poor social environment associated with the COVID-19 pandemic, maintaining a positive mindset, a daily routine, and physical activity may be protective against depression. For these purposes, we analysed socioenvironmental variables, distress, and psychosocial experiences associated with COVID-19, the frequency of physical exercise, and psychological scales examining loneliness and gratitude. We believe that our study could contribute to the development of a basic coping strategy during this pandemic, based on risk and protective factors for depression.

Methods

Study design and participants

This was an online-based cross-sectional study that was part of a survey on the psychosocial effects of COVID-19 in the general population. Details of the data collection method were described previously [20]. Briefly, between April 24 and May 5 of 2020, the third month of the COVID-19 outbreak in South Korea, we conducted an anonymous online survey of residents aged 19–65 years from three metropolitan areas according to prevalence of COVID-19. The online survey was conducted via a service provider (Macromill Embrain). For this survey, an invitation e-mail was sent to 4,065 individuals registered in the survey pools, of whom 3,065 (75.4%) accessed the link to the survey instructions. Of these, 1,206 (39.3%) were excluded because they did not meet the survey criteria and 40 (1.3%) refused to take part in the survey. A total of 1,819 people completed the survey and data for 1,500 were finally collected, after excluding 319 (17.5%) with unreliable or invalid responses including the same or a stereotyped pattern of responses to questions and illogical responses. In this study, data from 1,492 respondents with no history of COVID-19 infection (excluding eight confirmed cases of COVID-19) were used. The study was approved by the Chonnam National University Hospital Institutional Review Board (CNUH-2020-092). Electronic informed consent was obtained from each participant prior to starting the investigation.

Outcome measures

Demographic variables included sex, age, marital status (married or not), residential location, religious identity, education level, medical insurance (Medicaid or Medicare), employment status (unemployed or temporarily employed vs. employed, student, or homemaker), frequency of exercise (three times or more per week before and during the COVID-19 pandemic, respectively), and smoking status. Clinical characteristics included underlying physical or mental illness (defined as currently taking medication for a condition), quarantine experience, and COVID-19 testing.

Depression was measured using the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) [21]. A cut-off score of ≥ 10, was used as an indicator of clinically relevant symptoms of depression according to a previous study showing 88% sensitivity and specificity [22]. Gratitude and loneliness as indices of psychological status were measured using a six-item version of the Gratitude Questionnaire (GQ-6) [23] and the three-item UCLA Loneliness Scale [24, 25]. The Korean versions of these scales were validated with favourable reliability and validity [26,27,28]. Cronbach’s alpha values of all these measures are above 0.8 in the present study.

A questionnaire developed and validated by the authors was used to identify psychological and behavioural changes and distress due to the spread of COVID-19. The psychometric properties of this questionnaire are presented in a previous paper [20]. All items in the questionnaire were rated using a five-point Likert scale. The COVID-19-related questionnaire included five factors: fear of COVID-19 infection (seven items), difficulties related to outside activities (four items), disturbances in eating and sleeping (three items), stigma of COVID-19 (three items), and fear of blame for COVID-19 infection (two items). In addition, six items related to stress associated with the COVID-19 pandemic, including economic stress and difficulty with obtaining daily necessities, were included. Scores on all subfactors of the questionnaire are presented as mean values (total scores divided by number of items).

Statistical analysis

Differences in sociodemographic, clinical, and psychosocial characteristics for those with depression measured by PHQ-9 were analysed using the chi-square test for categorical variables and independent t-tests for continuous variables. Variables that were significantly associated with depression at the p < 0.05 level in the univariate analyses were simultaneously entered into a multiple logistic regression analysis to identify factors independently associated with depression. SPSS for Windows software was used to perform the statistical tests. All statistical tests were two-tailed, and p-values <0.05 were considered significant.

Results

Among 1,500 members of the general population, eight people (0.5%) had been infected by COVID-19. The prevalence of depression, indicated by PHQ-9 scores≥10, was 21.1% in the total population (316 of 1,500 people) and 20.9% without COVID-19 (312 of 1,492). Half of infected people (four of eight) exhibited depression, but this incidence was not significant (p = 0.066).

Table 1 shows comparisons of sociodemographic factors and scores on clinical scales with or without depression in the general population uninfected by COVID-19. Unmarried people, smokers, people on psychiatric medication, and unemployed or temporarily employed people were significantly more likely to exhibit depression. Those with depression were significantly younger than those without. In contrast, people who were currently exercising at least three times weekly were significantly less likely to exhibit depression. However, the frequency of exercise before the pandemic was not significantly associated with depression. There was no significant difference in depression according to sex, religion, region, or presence of a physical illness treated by medication.

Table 1 Comparisons of sociodemographic factors and clinical scales according to the presence of depression
Full size table

The loneliness scale scores were significantly higher, and the GQ-6 scores significantly lower, in people with depression than in those without. Of the items used to assess COVID-19 distress, scores for fear of infection, disturbance in eating and sleeping, stigma of COVID-19, fear of blame for COVID-19 infection, and stress associated with COVID-19 were significantly higher in people with depression.

Table 2 shows the results of the logistic regression analysis of factors associated with depression. Higher scores on the loneliness scale, younger age, current smoking, and current psychiatric treatment were significantly associated with increased risks of depression. Of the questions specifically asking about COVID-19-related distress, disturbances in eating and sleeping and the level of stress due to COVID-19 were significantly associated with increased risks of depression. In contrast, exercising three times or more per week during the COVID-19 pandemic and scores on the GQ-6 were significantly inversely associated with depression. The proportion of the explained variance (Nagelkerke R2) in this logistic regression model was 36.4%.

Table 2 Multiple logistic regression analysis to detect factors associated with depression
Full size table

Discussion

Our study results showed that during the COVID-19 pandemic, about one in five members of the general population who were not infected had clinically significant depression. Thus, the prevalence of depression was rather high. The risk of depression was increased in people suffering from loneliness and COVID-19-related stress, people who experienced psycho-behavioural changes such as disturbances in eating and sleeping, smokers, people with underlying mental illness, and those who were younger. However, regular exercise and attitudes of gratitude were inversely associated with depression. Our study demonstrated that psychosocial changes and COVID-19-related stress increased the risk of depression and suggested that maintaining life routines such as regular exercise, eating, and sleeping and positive mind may be helpful in preventing depression during these COVID-19 times.

The prevalence of depression (21%) found in this study was similar to that of previous reports about depression prevalence (PHQ-9≥10) during the COVID-19 pandemic in the US, Europe, and Asian countries (14.4–27.8%) [2, 4, 29,30,31]. According to the 2019 Korea Community Health Survey, the prevalence of depression in Korea, using the PHQ-9, was only 4.3% in 2018 [32]. Although there are limitations to comparing subjects and methods directly across studies, our results, showing an approximately fivefold increase in the prevalence of depression, suggest that psychosocial changes induced by the COVID-19 pandemic increased the risk of depression. The development of psychosocial strategies for the prevention of depression is urgently needed. For this, we should first understand the pathogenesis of, and factors associated with depression in COVID-19 pandemic societies.

In this study, the stress associated with psychosocial changes due to COVID-19 was significantly associated with increased risks of depression. In previous studies, groups with high COVID-19-related stress had an increased risk of depression compared to those that did not [33]. When people are exposed to situations beyond their control, they become helpless and lack motivation, resulting in depression [34]. The societal changes caused by the rapidly increasing number of confirmed COVID 19 cases and deaths have exacerbated uncertainty and reduced individuals’ sense of control. Furthermore, restriction of social and economic activities may increase the risk of cause depression.

Disturbances of sleep and eating patterns related to COVID-19, which were also significantly associated with increased risks of depression, might be more easily modified at a personal level. While a causal relationship is unclear, the inverse relationship between regular exercise during the pandemic and depression suggests that maintaining healthy lifestyles like regular exercise, eating habits, and sleep patterns daily may be important tools for preventing depression in the COVID-19 era [35] by improving mental and physical health. Our findings are consistent with a Spanish study showing that a healthy, balanced diet, following daily routines, and maintaining daily outdoor activities were coping behaviours that could reduce depression [36].

Loneliness was strongly associated with the risk of depression in our study. Loneliness is also associated with social isolation and appears to mediate depression [37]. Although social distancing is effective in preventing the coronavirus spread, it can cause loneliness due to emotional disconnection [30]. Despite long-lasting and inevitable social distancing policies, social and emotional interactions may reduce impacts of loneliness on depression.

In recent studies, positive traits such as optimism and resilience significantly moderated the relationship between fear of COVID-19 and depression and reduced the negative effects of COVID-19 on mental health [38]. In this study, gratitude was inversely associated with depression, corroborating findings that gratitude as a form of resilience has a buffering effect on the negative mental health consequences of stressful events [39]. Gratitude is an expression of appreciation for people or things in one’s life [40]. It is associated with several positive traits, including social support, self-esteem, and satisfaction with life [23]. At societal levels, gratitude is also important in forming and maintaining social relationships and encouraging people to be more prosocial [41]. Our results suggest that, during this COVID-19 pandemic, people are experiencing social isolation and loneliness, gratitude can be a psychological antidote to depression by reinforcing social bonds as well as positive mood. Although the COVID-19 pandemic and associated societal changes are drastically influencing our lives, positive attitudes and a sense of gratitude are likely to be helpful in preventing depression. Gratitude can be cultivated and trained by personal practice or group programs (e.g. writing a gratitude diary, expressing gratitude in a group or within couples) [42, 43]. Therefore, a public campaign to express gratitude and applying gratitude interventions in clinical practice, can be beneficial for coping with stress during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Socially and mentally vulnerable populations, such as the unemployed or temporary workers as well as people with underlying psychiatric illnesses, were more likely to have current significant depressive symptoms, although employment status was no longer significant in the adjusted analysis. Mentally ill persons may have limited social and medical support after the COVID-19 pandemic. Therefore, it is necessary to provide continuing care and carefully observe those with underlying psychiatric illnesses. In other studies, concerns about losing jobs and unemployment status increased depression [36, 44]. As COVID-19 transforms the labour market, individuals with precarious employment may show increased susceptibility to depression [45]. We should pay more attention to socially and mentally vulnerable people exposed to social and natural disasters.

The younger generation tended to be at greater risks of depression. Generally, the prevalence of depression is higher in middle aged and elderly people [46]. However, many recent studies have found that young people were more vulnerable to mental health problems during the COVID-19 pandemic era [3, 21, 30, 31, 47,48,49]. Current drastic social changes may have greater impacts on the younger generation, whose psychological resilience and established social base may be inadequate for this situation. They may experience greater fear and worry about their future while living in this socioeconomically unstable society. In addition, young people are at greater risks for emerging psychiatric problems. Taken together, these results indicate that populations who are psychosocially vulnerable may be more severely affected by the distress associated with COVID-19. Therefore, we should observe these vulnerable populations carefully to facilitate early detection of mental health problems and to provide more active support [50].

Cigarette smoking is reportedly associated with increased risks of depression [51]. Recent studies investigating factors associated with depression also showed that smoking was associated with depression during the COVID-19 pandemic [52]. Both the biological impacts of smoking on neurotransmitters and vascular health [53] and the psychosocial influence of this respiratory pandemic on smokers should be considered as factors in the pathogenesis of depression in smokers.

This study has several limitations. First, we should be careful in applying our results to other populations affected by COVID-19. Second, causal relationships are uncertain because this study was cross-sectional. In particular, disturbances in eating and sleeping are symptoms of depression. Longitudinal studies are needed to investigate the risks and protective factors of depression associated with the COVID-19 pandemic. Finally, results via an online survey method may differ from those acquired through face-to-face surveys, and there is a potential for selection bias. Therefore, caution is required when comparing the results of online and face-to-face surveys.

Conclusions

Findings of the factors associated with increased risks of depression in the general population during the COVID-19 pandemic offer important clinical implications for the general population as well as for researchers. We should pay more attention to the younger people, smokers, and people with mental health problems who might be at higher risks of depression. Psychological support for the loneliness and distress due to psychosocial changes related to COVID-19 are required to prevent depression. Furthermore, maintaining daily routines, including a regular/balanced diet, sleeping, and exercise, and having a sense of gratitude may be helpful in preventing depression. Although it has been quite difficult to overcome the COVID-19 pandemic and its associated drastic societal changes, adhering to daily routines with gratitude in mind is a relatively straightforward way to prevent depression. These coping behaviours can be recommended to the public during this exceptional situation, and should be encouraged, even with social distancing measures in place [36]. Additional studies investigating the effectiveness of psychosocial strategies to prevent depression should be conducted.

Availability of data and materials

The dataset supporting the conclusions of this article is available on request from the first author.

References

  1. Kim SW, Su KP. Using psychoneuroimmunity against COVID-19. Brain Behav Immun. 2020;87:4–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbi.2020.03.025.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Choi EPH, Hui BPH, Wan EYF. Depression and anxiety in Hong Kong during COVID-19. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17:3740. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17103740.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Fukase Y, Ichikura K, Murase H, Tagaya H. Depression, risk factors, and coping strategies in the context of social dislocations resulting from the second wave of COVID-19 in Japan. BMC Psychiatry. 2021;21:33. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-021-03047-y.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Kim JW, Stewart R, Kang SJ, Jung SI, Kim SW, Kim JM. Telephone based Interventions for psychological problems in hospital isolated patients with COVID-19. Clin Psychopharmacol Neurosci. 2020;18(4):616–20. https://doi.org/10.9758/cpn.2020.18.4.616.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Vindegaard N, Benros ME. COVID-19 pandemic and mental health consequences: systematic review of the current evidence. Brain Behav Immun. 2020;89:531–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbi.2020.05.048.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. McKeever A, Agius M, Mohr P. A review of the epidemiology of major depressive disorder and of its consequences for society and the individual. Psychiatr Danub. 2017;29(Suppl 3):222–31.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Meng X, Brunet A, Turecki G, Liu A, D'Arcy C, Caron J. Risk factor modifications and depression incidence: a 4-year longitudinal Canadian cohort of the Montreal Catchment Area Study. BMJ Open. 2017;7:e015156. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015156.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Achterbergh L, Pitman A, Birken M, Pearce E, Sno H, Johnson S. The experience of loneliness among young people with depression: a qualitative meta-synthesis of the literature. BMC Psychiatry. 2020;20:415. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-020-02818-3.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Lopresti AL, Hood SD, Drummond PD. A review of lifestyle factors that contribute to important pathways associated with major depression: diet, sleep and exercise. J Affect Disord. 2013;148:12–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2013.01.014.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Layous K, Chancellor J, Lyubomirsky S. Positive activities as protective factors against mental health conditions. J Abnorm Psychol. 2014;123:3–12. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034709.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Lin CC. Gratitude and depression in young adults: The mediating role of self-esteem and well-being. Personal Individ Differ. 2015;87:30–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.07.017.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Rozanski A, Kubzansky LD. Psychologic functioning and physical health: a paradigm of flexibility. Psychosom Med. 2005;67:S47–53. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.psy.0000164253.69550.49.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Wu P, Fang Y, Guan Z, Fan B, Kong J, Yao Z, et al. The psychological impact of the SARS epidemic on hospital employees in China: exposure, risk perception, and altruistic acceptance of risk. Can J Psychiatr. 2009;54(5):302–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/070674370905400504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Lambert NM, Fincham FD, Stillman TF. Gratitude and depressive symptoms: The role of positive reframing and positive emotion. Cognit Emot. 2012;26:615–33. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2011.595393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Tulbure BT. Appreciating the positive protects us from negative emotions: The relationship between gratitude, depression and religiosity. Procedia Soc Behav Sci. 2015;187:475–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.03.089.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Van Dusen JP, Tiamiyu MF, Kashdan TB, Elhai JD. Gratitude, depression and PTSD: assessment of structural relationships. Psychiatry Res. 2015;230:867–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2015.11.036.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Lee JY, Kim SY, Bae KY, Kim JM, Shin IS, Yoon JS, et al. The association of gratitude with perceived stress and burnout among male firefighters in Korea. Personal Individ Differ. 2018;123:205–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.11.010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Feng L, Yin R. Social support and hope mediate the relationship between gratitude and depression among Front-Line Medical staff during the pandemic of COVID-19. Front Psychol. 2021;12:623873. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.623873.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Harvey SB, Øverland S, Hatch SL, Wessely S, Mykletun A, Hotopf M. Exercise and the prevention of depression: results of the HUNT cohort study. Am J Psychiatry. 2018;175:28–36. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.2017.16111223.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Kim M, Park IH, Kang YS, Kim H, Jhon M, Kim JW, et al. Comparison of psychosocial distress in areas with different COVID-19 prevalence in Korea. Front Psychiatry. 2020;11:593105. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2020.593105.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Spitzer RL, Kroenke K, Williams JB, Group PHQPCS. Validation and utility of a self-report version of PRIME-MD: the PHQ primary care study. JAMA. 1999;282:1737–44.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JB. The PHQ-9: validity of a brief depression severity measure. J Gen Intern Med. 2001;16:606–13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. McCullough ME, Emmons RA, Tsang JA. The grateful disposition: A conceptual and empirical topography. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2002;82:112–27. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.82.1.112.

  24. Hughes ME, Waite LJ, Hawkley LC, Cacioppo JT. A short scale for measuring loneliness in large surveys: results from two population-based studies. Res Aging. 2004;26:655–72. https://doi.org/10.1177/0164027504268574.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Russell D, Peplau LA, Cutrona CE. The revised UCLA loneliness scale: concurrent and discriminant validity evidence. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1980;39:472–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Han C, Jo SA, Kwak JH, Pae CU, Steffens D, Jo I, et al. Validation of the patient health questionnaire-9 Korean version in the elderly population: the Ansan Geriatric study. Compr Psychiatry. 2008;49:218–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comppsych.2007.08.006.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Kim OS. Korean version of the revised UCLA loneliness scale: reliability and validity test. J Nurs Acad Soc. 1997;27:871–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Kwon SJ, Kim KH, Lee HS. Validation of the Korean version of gratitude questionnaire. Korean J Health Psychol. 2006;11:177–90.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Ettman CK, Abdalla SM, Cohen GH, Sampson L, Vivier PM, Galea S. Prevalence of depression symptoms in US adults before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. JAMA Netw Open. 2020;3:e2019686. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.19686.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Palgi Y, Shrira A, Ring L, Bodner E, Avidor S, Bergman Y, et al. The loneliness pandemic: loneliness and other concomitants of depression, anxiety and their comorbidity during the COVID-19 outbreak. J Affect Disord. 2020;275:109–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2020.06.036.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Pieh C, Budimir S, Probst T. The effect of age, gender, income, work, and physical activity on mental health during coronavirus disease (COVID-19) lockdown in Austria. J Psychosom Res. 2020;136:110186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychores.2020.110186.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Korea Health Statistics 2018: Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES VII-3). Sejong: Ministy of Health and Welfare; 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Rudenstine S, McNeal K, Schulder T, Ettman CK, Hernandez M, Gvozdieva K, et al. Depression and anxiety during the covid-19 pandemic in an urban, low-income public university sample. J Trauma Stress. 2021;34(1):12–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Seligman ME. Learned helplessness. Annu Rev Med. 1972;23(1):407–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Jiménez-Pavón D, Carbonell-Baeza A, Lavie CJ. Physical exercise as therapy to fight against the mental and physical consequences of COVID-19 quarantine: special focus in older people. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2020;63:386–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pcad.2020.03.009.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Fullana MA, Hidalgo-Mazzei D, Vieta E, Radua J. Coping behaviors associated with decreased anxiety and depressive symptoms during the COVID-19 pandemic and lockdown. J Affect Disord. 2020;275:80–1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2020.06.027.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Matthews T, Ambler A, Danese A, Moffitt TE, Wertz J, Arseneault L, et al. Social isolation, loneliness and depression in young adulthood: a behavioural genetic analysis. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2016;51(3):339–48.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Lisa MWV, Mirela H, Ivan N, Tom S, Gaëtan M. Optimism, mindfulness, and resilience as potential protective factors for the mental health consequences of fear of the coronavirus. Psychiatry Res. 2021;300:113927. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2021.113927.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Sheerin CM, Lind MJ, Brown EA, Gardner CO, Kendler KS, Amstadter AB. The impact of resilience and subsequent stressful life events on MDD and GAD. Depress Anxiety. 2018;35:140–7. https://doi.org/10.1002/da.22700.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. McCanlies EC, Gu JK, Andrew ME, Violanti JM. The effect of social support, gratitude, resilience and satisfaction with life on depressive symptoms among police officers following Hurricane Katrina. Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2018;64(1):63–72. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020764017746197.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Bartlett MY, Condon P, Cruz J, Baumann J, Desteno D. Gratitude: prompting behaviours that build relationships. Cognit Emot. 2012;26:2–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2011.561297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Ducasse D, Dassa D, Courtet P, Brand-Arpon V, Walter A, Guillaume S, et al. Gratitude diary for the management of suicidal inpatients: A randomized controlled trial. Depress Anxiety. 2019;36:400–11. https://doi.org/10.1002/da.22877.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Komase Y, Watanabe K, Kawakami N. Effects of a gratitude intervention program on work engagement among Japanese workers: a protocol for a cluster randomized controlled trial. BMC Psychol. 2021;9:35. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-021-00541-6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Verma S, Mishra A. Depression, anxiety, and stress and socio-demographic correlates among general Indian public during COVID-19. Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2020;66(8):756–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Shah SMA, Mohammad D, Qureshi MFH, Abbas MZ, Aleem S. Prevalence, psychological responses and associated correlates of depression, anxiety and stress in a global population, during the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic. Community Ment Health J. 2021;57(1):101–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10597-020-00728-y.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Alexopoulos GS. Depression in the elderly. Lancet. 2005;65:1961–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Ahmed MZ, Ahmed O, Aibao Z, Hanbin S, Siyu L, Ahmad A. Epidemic of COVID-19 in China and associated psychological problems. Asian J Psychiatr. 2020;51:102092. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajp.2020.102092.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Salari N, Hosseinian-Far A, Jalali R, Vaisi-Raygani A, Rasoulpoor S, Mohammadi M, et al. Prevalence of stress, anxiety, depression among the general population during the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Glob Health. 2020;16:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12992-020-00589-w.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Wang H, Xia Q, Xiong Z, Li Z, Xiang W, Yuan Y, et al. The psychological distress and coping styles in the early stages of the 2019 coronavirus disease (COVID-19) epidemic in the general mainland Chinese population: a web-based survey. PLoS One. 2020;15:e0233410. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0233410.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Kim SW, Kim JK, Jhon M, Lee HJ, Kim H, Kim JW, et al. Mindlink: a stigma-free youth-friendly community-based early intervention centre in Korea. Early Interv Psychiatry. 2020 [E-pub ahead]. https://doi.org/10.1111/eip.13076.

  51. Fluharty M, Taylor AE, Grabski M, Munafò MR. The association of cigarette smoking with depression and anxiety: a systematic review. Nicotine Tob Res. 2016;19:3–13. https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntw140.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. Ren Y, Qian W, Li Z, Liu Z, Zhou Y, Wang R, et al. Public mental health under the long-term influence of COVID-19 in China: geographical and temporal distribution. J Affect Disord. 2020;277:893–900. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2020.08.045.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Ambrose JA, Barua RS. The pathophysiology of cigarette smoking and cardiovascular disease: an update. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004;43:1731–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2003.12.047.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

This research was supported by grants of Patient-Centered Clinical Research Coordinating Center (PACEN) funded by the Ministry of Health & Welfare, Republic of Korea (grants number: HI19C0481, HC19C0316). The funders were not involved in the conception, design, analysis or interpretation of this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychiatry, Chonnam National University Medical School, 42 Jebong-ro, Dong-gu, Gwangju, 61469, Republic of Korea

    Sung-Wan Kim, Min Jhon, Ju-Wan Kim, Hee-Ju Kang, Seunghyong Ryu, Ju-Yeon Lee & Jae-Min Kim

  2. Gwangju Mental Health Commission, Gwangju, Korea

    Sung-Wan Kim, In-Hoo Park, Mina Kim & Ju-Yeon Lee

  3. Care Policy and Evaluation Centre, Department of Health Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, United Kingdom

    A-La Park

Authors
  1. Sung-Wan Kim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. In-Hoo Park
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Mina Kim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. A-La Park
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Min Jhon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Ju-Wan Kim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Hee-Ju Kang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Seunghyong Ryu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Ju-Yeon Lee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Jae-Min Kim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

SWK, MJ, JWK, and JYL were involved in the conception and design of the study. SWK, MK, IHP, SR, and JMK were involved in the analysis and interpretation of data. SWK drafted the manuscript and ALP, HJK, and JMK reviewed and critically revised the draft. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Sung-Wan Kim or Jae-Min Kim.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was approved by the Research Ethics Review Committee of Chonnam National University Hospital (approval number CNUH-2020-092). All participants were over 18 years old and electronic informed consent was obtained from each participant prior to starting the investigation. When participants checked consent, this survey was conducted. All methods were performed in accordance with the guidelines and regulations set by the University Institutional Review Board.

Consent for publication

Not applicable

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kim, SW., Park, IH., Kim, M. et al. Risk and protective factors of depression in the general population during the COVID-19 epidemic in Korea. BMC Psychiatry 21, 445 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-021-03449-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-021-03449-y

Keywords

BMC Psychiatry

ISSN: 1471-244X

Contact us