Skip to main content

Effects of parenting mode on student adaptability: the mediating effect of irrational beliefs

Abstract

Backgrounds

In the face of the new environment, different individuals have different reactions. Those who have good adaptability constantly establish individual self-efficacy through making friends and completing their studies, thus forming a good dependency with the university environment. However, individuals with poor ability to adapt to the new environment will have some bad phenomena, such as truancy, weariness and self denial. As a result, the students’ adaptations of to the growth environment where in universities are the important topics in recent years.

Methods

Present study introduces irrational beliefs to investigate the effects of parenting mode on maladaptation of university students. The questionnaires based on simplified parenting mode (Chinese), irrational belief and adaptability were administered in a survey of 510 university students in Zhanjiang on October, 2021, the list of students of Guangdong Ocean University is taken as the sampling frame and determined by random sampling. Parenting mode was used as the independent variable, while the emotionally warm, overprotective and rejecting types were used as the indices. Further, the irrational beliefs including summary comments, awful beliefs and low tolerance to setbacks as well as maladaptation were included in the mediation model for analysis.

Results

The results showed that the rejection parenting mode was negatively related with absolute requirements (r = − 0.143), and learning motivation (r = − 0.157), interpersonal adaptation (r = − 0.283) and physical and psychological adjustment (r = − 0.083). Overprotection was negatively correlated with absolute requirements (r = − 0.042) and interpersonal adaptation (r = − 0.042). The mediating effect of irrational beliefs (low tolerance to setbacks, awful beliefs and absolute requirements), the lower and upper limits of Bootstrap confidence interval were 0.135 and 0.461, respectively, excluding 0, which indicated that the mediating effect is true.

Conclusion

Through the analysis of the data, this study believes that irrational beliefs such as low tolerance to setbacks, awful beliefs and absolute requirements mediate the effects on school adjustment. Negative parenting modes such as overprotection and rejection inculcate irrational beliefs, resulting in maladaptation of university students.

Peer Review reports

Background

Adaptation of students to the growth environment in universities and smooth transition to adulthood are important topics at the university level of development. Appropriate and effective adaptation of individuals to environment is called adaptive behavior [1]. Exposure to a new environment at the university leads to rapid acquisition of new learning habits and friendships, showing good adaptability of university students [2]. However, some students will develop maladaptation behaviors, including learning fatigue, skipping classes,depression and human communication disorders [3]. Therefore, adaptability of university students is a topic that has attracted increasing attention in recent years.

Some scholars believed that “adaptability of university students” refers to a psychological equilibrium that students develop after continuous behavioral adjustment to surrounding environment, classmates and teachers after admission into university [4]. It is also a process of physical and psychological adaptation to the local environment. Some scholars also pointed out that “adaptability of university students” requires changes in individual behavior to reach cognitive and emotional balance and comply with external environmental and regulatory standards [5]. It requires healthy adaptation to changing living and learning environment. Researchers reported that “adaptability of university students” is the process in which freshmen adjust psychologically and behaviorally to perform changing roles in the new university environment [6]. According to Watson [7], the adaptability of university students mainly refers to psychological and behavioral processes facilitating adaptation to the new environment by freshmen in the university based on personal adjustment and external support.

With respect to studies involving the role of factors associated with adaptability of university students, Bi et al. [8] investigated the effects of personality traits and interpersonal dynamics in a family on student adaptation. Zhu et al. [9] reported that students with different personality traits and family background adapt differently. Credé and Niehorster [10] summarized the factors influencing the adaptability of university students, including demographic characteristics, early achievements, experience in universities, self-assessment, personality traits, coping style, social support, and family relationship. Thus, Chinese and foreign studies investigating factors influencing the adaptability of university students mainly involve environmental and individual elements. Environmental factors mainly include family, interpersonal and school environment. Individual factors mainly refer to personality traits. External factors involve the quality of relationship with family members (eg, parenting mode) [11]. According to the Evolutionary Theory of Socialization, parents guide children to develop different behavioral modes of environmental adaptation based on parenting styles [12]. In other words, parental style have an important impact on the socialization of adult children. Parenting mode was firstly proposed by Diana Baumrind, a psychologist. From a psychological perspective, parenting mode refers to ordinary behavioral pattern of parents associated with raising and education of their children. It includes not only parenting behaviors, but also parenting emotions and attitudes [13]. Thus, parenting mode includes language and non-language behaviors or emotional atmosphere created by parents [14]. Arrindell et al. [15] divided parenting modes into warm emotional, overprotective and rejection types. The warm emotional type indicates prompt emotional recognition of children’s needs by parents by providing adequate love and supports, thereby ensuring two-way information flow, smooth communication and ordered and reasonable parent-child dependence [16,17,18]. Overprotection refers to parental recognition of children’s needs via excessive control and lack of space to exercise freedom of choice, thereby leading to one-way information flow and tense parent-child relationship. Rejection indicates parents’ insensitivity to the needs and appeals of their children, which hinders parent-child communication. Moreover, parents punish and excessively constrain children’s freedom. Researchers generally regard overprotection and rejection as negative parenting modes [19, 20].

Previous studies have shown that parenting styles and emotion regulation strategies can affect children intentionally or unintentionally [21]. Therefore, parenting style is conceptualized as a context that moderates the influence of specific parenting practices on the child [13, 22]. Compared with the other two parenting modes, the warm emotional type can induce development of rational beliefs and decrease maladaptation of university students. First, parents interact and communicate with children during parenting, resulting in shared positive emotional experiences. Therefore, parents can provide timely emotional feedback and material support to alleviate tension and anxiety in any maladaptation effectively [23]. Second, the warm emotional type contributes to a relatively close relationship between parents and children via two-way interaction and communication. As a result, children experience fewer negative emotions, such as insecurity and loneliness. Effective two-way interaction between parents and children in the new environment decreases emotional pressure associated with maladaptation [24, 25]. Third, experiencing parental emotions during stressful events is highly effective in enhancing psychological adaptation of children [22]. Increased parental encouragement and support can contribute to psychological health of children, including self-reliance [26]. Positive psychological traits and strategies to cope with crisis enable increased utilization of resources to resolve environmental stress, which, in return, can strengthen their self-efficacy. Positive effects of both authoritative parenting and relationship closeness on school performance were found for European Americans and, to some extent, second-generation Chinese [27, 28] In contrast, overprotected and rejected children experience negative emotions during growth and easily accumulate irrational beliefs. Irrational beliefs refer to absolute requirements and distorted perception of self, others, surrounding environment and objects [29].whereas indulgent and authoritative parenting shared greater parental warmth. In a university setting, which is beyond parental control, children encounter a new environment, make new friends and new interpersonal communication, and are forced to adapt to various tensions and anxieties caused by environmental changes [30]. To investigate the impact of previous beliefs on behavioral adaptation, this study introduced the concept of irrational beliefs to discuss the relationship between parenting mode and adaptability of university students outside parental control. The mechanism of parenting mode and its effect on the adaptability of university students and their development are discussed. Results provide a standard of reference for universities to implement accurate student management and prevent maladaptation.

What is the best parenting for healthy development and good school adjustment?According to previous studies, parenting based on demandingness, combined with responsiveness, is identify as the best parenting to promote healthy development, particularly in studies with middle-class European-American families [13, 31, 32]. Studies have also shown that parenting is closely related to cultural environment, for example,other studies identify the benefits of greater responsiveness, but without demandingness, mostly in studies in European countries as the beast parenting strategy for a healthy development [33, 34], including school achievement [35]. In general, a stable family structure, healthy development of family function and supportive parents are conducive to development of a positive personality in adolescence [36]. Further, children who have parents with higher education display better psychological health and less misconduct [37]. Based on the foregoing analysis, this study proposed the following hypothesis:

  • H1. Negative parenting mode which includes rejection parenting mode and overprotection parenting mode can affect the student’s adaptation.

  • H2. Negative parenting mode which include rejection and overprotection have a direct negative influence on the adaptability of university students.

  • H3. Irrational beliefs have a complete mediating effect on students’ adaptation to negative parental rearing patterns.

Research methods

Research subjects

A questionnaire survey was conducted in a university located in Zhanjiang on October, 2021 by using random sampling method. A total of 510 students participated in the survey and 510 completed questionnaires were received, showing a collection rate of 100%. The age range is 18–22 years old, mean is 18.37, standard deviation is 1.264. At the same time, since this survey does not consider the impact of ethnic attributes on students’ adaptation, the ethnic situation of the respondents is simplified into Han and ethnic minorities when collecting data. The specific sample composition is shown in Table 1.

Table 1 Descriptive analysis of demographic characteristics (N = 510)

Research tools

Simplified parenting mode questionnaire for Chinese adolescents (S-EMBU-C)

In this study, the simple revised version [38] was administered. Since this study focuses on parenting mode, the parent questionnaire was integrated to generate 21 questions in three dimensions, including emotional warmth, overprotection and rejection. The questionnaire adopted the 4-level scoring method (1 = never and 4 = always). The higher total scores of factors indicate increasingly obvious parenting modes. In this study, the Cronbach’s α values associated with the three dimensions were 0.945, 0.823 and 0.915, respectively. The Cronbach’s α of the whole questionnaire was 0.848, the split half reliability of the whole questionnaire is 0.944,the internal consistency reliability of the questionnaire is high.

Irrational belief survey (IBS) of university students

In this study, the irrational belief survey (IBS) compiled for university students was used [39]. IBS mainly includes 15 questions in four dimensions including summary comment, awful beliefs, absolute requirement and low tolerance to setbacks. The questionnaire used the 5-level scoring method. The higher score indicates stronger irrational beliefs (1 = strongly disagree and 5 = strongly agree). The Cronbach’s α values associated with the four dimensions of the questionnaire were 0.841, 0.706, 0.802 and 0.731, respectively. The Cronbach’s α of the whole questionnaire was 0.836, the split half reliability of the whole questionnaire is 0.854, the internal consistency reliability of the questionnaire is high.

School adaptation questionnaire

The Student Adaptation to College Questionnaire (SACQ) compiled by Baker and Siryk in 1984 is used mostly for the evaluation of factors associated with adaptability of university students as well as scale development [40, 41]. This questionnaire comprises 67 questions in four dimensions: academic adjustment, social adjustment, personal/emotional adjustment and general institutional attachment. Combined with research practices, this study compiled a Chinese Student Adaptation to College Questionnaire based on SACQ, which contains 22 questions in five dimensions, including academic pressure, learning motivations, interpersonal adaption, school adjustment and physical-psychological adjustment. The questionnaire used a 5-level scoring method. The higher score indicates stronger adaptation (1 = strongly disagree and 5 = strongly agree). The Cronbach’s α values associated with the five dimensions were 0.841, 0.813, 0.789, 0.801 and 0.831, respectively. The Cronbach’s α of the whole questionnaire was 0.815, the split half reliability of the whole questionnaire is 0.851, the internal consistency reliability of the questionnaire is high. From Table 2, we can learn the total picture of major variables, this study contains three dimensions, each dimension contains several indicators.

Table 2 The dimension structure of questionnaires

Data processing

Mediating effect refers to the impact of independent variable X on the dependent variable Y through the intermediate variable M [42]. Statistical analysis of major variables was performed using SPSS24.0 and Amos24.0 programs. According to the results of deviation from the common method, there are 8 factors with characteristic root higher than 1. The variance interpretation rate of the first common factor was 15.4%, which was smaller than the critical value (40%), which suggests that the deviation was not significant (Table 3).

Table 3 The explanation of total variation

Results

Analysis of parenting mode, irrational beliefs and school adjustment factors

Descriptive statistical analysis

The significance of differences between major demographic variables was analyzed. As shown in Table 4, we can learn that the perception of boys was weaker than that of girls regarding parenting mode. Girls were the most sensitive to emotional warm parenting mode.

Table 4 The descriptive analysis results of two independent groups (N = 510)

It can be seen from Table 5 that the emotional warmth type of education has a positive predictive effect on students’ adaptation. Refusal type and overprotective type had negative predictive effect on students’ adaptation (p <  0.05).

Table 5 Regression analysis of students’ adaptation among variables

Validity analysis

The validity of this study mainly includes construct validity, convergent validity (Table 6) and the discriminant validity (Table 7).

Table 6 The convergent validity
Table 7 The discriminant validity

By performing a confirmatory factor analysis using the Amos24.0 programs, we can find that the χ2/df = 2.142,less than 3,GFI = 0.901,greater than 0.9, AGFI = 0.917, greater than 0.9, RMSEA = 0.047,less than 0.08,NFI = 0.969, greater than 0.9, IFI = 0.926,greater than 0.9, CFI = 0.925, greater than 0.9. All values are within the acceptable standard range, indicating that the variables used in this study meet the requirements of the theoretical model.

Through CFA analysis of 9 potential variables, including warm parenting style, refusal parenting style, overprotective parenting style, extreme bad, absolute requirements, interpersonal adaptation, school adaptation, learning motivation and learning pressure,the load of all factors is between 0.6–0.9, and the average difference variation extraction is between 0.5–0.9 (Table 6). Meet the standards of Hair, et al. (2009) and Foretell and Larker (1981): 1. The factor load is greater than 0.5; 2. The extraction amount of mean variance variance is greater than 0.5 [43]. It can be seen that all variables in this study have good convergent validity.

Table 7 shows that there is a significant correlation between emotional warm parenting, irrational beliefs and students’ adaptation (p < 0.01). The absolute values of correlation coefficients are all less than 0.5, and are all less than the square root of the corresponding Ave. That is to say, there is a certain correlation between the potential variables, and there is a certain degree of discrimination between them, that is, the discrimination of the scale data is ideal.

Mediating effect of irrational beliefs

In this study, parenting mode was used as the independent variable, while emotionally warm, overprotective and rejecting types were used as indices. Further, irrational beliefs including summary comments, awful beliefs and low tolerance to setbacks as well as maladaptation were included in the mediation model for analysis. The simulation fitting result is relatively good. The standardization model of mediating effects based on pathway analysis is presented in Fig.1, and we can find the factor load.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Mediating effect of irrational beliefs on the relationship between parenting mode and adaptability of university students

A total of 5000 Bootstrap samples were analyzed using the Bootstrap method and the 95% confidence interval was selected to determine the general, direct and indirect mediating effects (Table 8). The total effect of negative parenting mode on students’ adaptation the lower and upper limits of the Bootstrap confidence interval were 0.253 and 0.396, excluding 0. Hence, the total effect is true. The lower and upper limits of Bootstrap confidence interval of direct effect were − 0.017 and 0.263, respectively, including 0. Hence, the direct effect is false. For the mediating effect of irrational beliefs (low tolerance to setbacks, awful beliefs and absolute requirements), the lower and upper limits of Bootstrap confidence interval were 0.135 and 0.461, respectively, excluding 0. Therefore, the mediating effect is true.

Table 8 The Bootstrap mediating effects of parenting on student’s adaptation

Discussion

From the above analysis,we can learn that the hypothesis we made have been verified。In other words,it suggests that parental warmth was negatively related to learning pressure, negative parenting modes including overprotection and rejection are associated with irrational beliefs awful beliefs, summary comments and absolute requirements are significantly positively correlated with school maladjustment. Parental warmth represents greater parental responsiveness and parental overprotection, greater demandingness. By contrast, parental rejection represents greater parental demandingness, but poor parental responsiveness [44, 45], which can cause students’ maladjustment [46]. The combination of parenting attitudes, emotional expression and parenting behaviors enhance parent-child interaction during development [47]. Thus, the parenting mode determines the conceptual and behavioral changes in children during growth and development of individual values. It is difficult to provide rational training if parents are overprotective, rejecting and crude, or criticize and control children unduly, and lack acceptance, understanding, forgiveness or respect for their children. Negative parenting modes can inculcate extreme and one-sided concepts in children, such as “any mistake will lead to serious consequences” and “I will be laughed at for mistakes”. These concepts will be solidified consciously and children find it difficult to accept individual failures and setbacks, resulting in irrational beliefs.

According to Bronfenbrenner, the microsystem, intermediate external system, and macrosystem represent a complete hierarchical system around individuals. Individual represents the core of the system and family is an important component of microsystem [48]. Parents are the first teachers of children and are important initial contacts. Family is the first site of individual socialization and represents the most direct and specific microenvironment for individual growth. It is an important element in individual adaptation [49]. As a structural system, family is an important place in childhood socialization. Each member is an important structural component and plays a unique role in the family [50]. Individuals learn social norms, cultural values and behavioral modes in families, while parents influence socialization of children via parenting mode [51]. Thus, the student behaviors reflect the parenting mode. Additional, warm parenting style has a positive impact on the whole life course of children [52]. University students are in early developmental stage of life, leaving families behind and facing a new living and learning environment. Arnett [53] also designated it as early adulthood characterized by individual instability, inadequate self-identity, self-concern, developmental transition and various possibilities. According to the eight-stage theory of personality development proposed by Erickson, university students are in the stage of transition from puberty to early adulthood. While insisting on self-identity, university students are eager to search for intimate relations with others and are extremely easy to exhibit maladaptation in interpersonal communication and psychological anxiety as well as discomfort [54]. Data suggest that parents and children are equally warm emotionally and children are provided with increasing number of opportunities for expression. Under such a parenting mode, children develop ability for empathy [55]. Following admission to the university, children from emotionally secure families develop good interpersonal relations. However, children experiencing overprotection and rejection often remain emotionally insecure and dependent, thus developing irrational beliefs such as absolute requirements. These children manifest maladaptation. University students in puberty are free from strict parental supervision and punishment, which decreases negative emotional experience. Besides, these students experience individual independence differently and the new connections with classmates and teachers increase their positive emotional experience. A decrease in negative emotional experiences with a concomitant increase in positive emotions facilitates adaptation of freshmen to campus environment, which is consistent with resource substitution theory and the law of conservation of energy [56]. Therefore, universities have an obligation to provide students with sufficient positive emotional experience upon admission, establish an all-inclusive teaching environment, increase their sense of acquisition and values, and improve self-reliance in individuals coping with difficulties and setbacks. The stronger the individual self-reliance, the more likely it is to develop acceptable behaviors for improved adaptability at the university level [57].

This study also found that irrational beliefs including poor tolerance to setbacks, awful beliefs and absolute requirements strongly mediate the relationship between negative parenting modes (overprotection and rejection) and maladaptation (insufficient learning motivation and poor interpersonal adaptation) of university students. This finding suggests that overprotection and rejection inculcates strong irrational beliefs. The study demonstrated that belief is an important factor influencing individual emotion and behavior. Many negative emotions and unhealthy psychological states are directly associated with irrational beliefs. As a result, students with profound and irrational beliefs easily experience adverse emotions compared with other students, resulting in academic difficulties and tense interpersonal relations. This mechanism of parenting mode contributes to maladaptation of university students observed in this study, suggesting that negative parenting mode does not directly influence the adaptability of university students, but contributes to their irrational beliefs. According to social cognitive theory of Ban Dula [58], self-cognition is influenced by individual attribution patterns, emotional and physiological responses, and the effects of others and verbal persuasion. Students’ irrational beliefs are mostly shaped by the past and emotional as well as psychological experiences. Children experiencing parental overprotection and rejection exhibit problems associated with interpersonal adaptation. University students who leave their parents behind have neither stable values nor well-developed self-cognition. This stage is an important element in strengthening students’ self-support system, shedding negative family influences gradually and establishing strong adaptability [59]. According to the social support theory, individuals can avoid negative effects of stress by receiving psychological and emotional support as needed [60]. Supportive behaviors of others not only help individuals physically and psychologically in daily life, but also lower subjective evaluation of individuals during severe crisis under stressful events. Therefore, schools can provide students with an established support system. For interpersonal adaptation, universities should focus on the management of different problems faced by different students and provide appropriate counseling and interventions. Universities should facilitate mutual assistance since communication and exchange among students are easier to create a strong atmosphere for interpersonal relations. To ensure psychological and self-adaptation, universities should provide a platform for diversified training and development, encourage students to set their own goals and independently chart out their careers. Universities should encourage different types of club activity, strengthen construction of a second classroom for students, provide multiple avenues for social interaction and arts and sports activities. Teachers can offer friendly support and assistance, ideological counseling and psychological guidance and thereby reinforce the university support system, strengthen the positive emotional experience and reduce the impact of irrational beliefs. Thus, the adaptability of university students can be improved [61].

This study suggests that irrational beliefs such as low tolerance to setbacks, awful beliefs and absolute requirements have a significantly positive correlation with maladaptation including insufficient learning motivation and poor interpersonal adaptation among university students. Personality is an inherent individual trait comprising a combination of stable and unique psychological qualities formed via interaction between genetics and environment. Individual hallmarks of personality include cognition, emotion and behavior [62]. The concept of individual cognition explains the formation and development of personality. Irrational beliefs can contribute to personality traits such as maladaptation among university students. Maladaptive behaviors can be generated by individual intolerance to setbacks or difficulties, or sheer pessimism [63]. Recent studies have shown that parental rearing patterns not only can significantly affect adolescents’ mental health [64], but also effect eating disorders and substance abuse [65]. Furthermore, students’ goal orientation, personality traits and parental rearing patterns are also closely related [66]. Although parental rearing patterns have various influences on young college students, universities can still do something for students. For example, universities should evaluate students’ parenting modes using surveys before beginning of term and then design different management strategies accordingly for accurate management, and improve management level and quality continuously. First, universities must accept students unconditionally, including their strengths and weaknesses. Second, universities should contribute to emotional experiences positively based on rational emotional therapy [67]. For example, universities can assist students with exploration of their potential positive emotions and strengths, promote development of positive qualities. They can facilitate exploration of personal values by establishing positive interpersonal relationships, setting up an accurate view of life, to inculcate the sense of success, formulate and realize goals based on their strengths. Thus, students can develop positive self-cognition.

Strengths and limitations

This study provides a few standard recommendations to prevent and improve maladaptation of university students. In addition to developing positive parenting modes, parents need to establish robust relationship with children, create a warm, ordered, respectful and tolerant family atmosphere, and avoid crude one-way communication. Universities should strengthen connections with families, enhance parental counseling and communication skills. In particular, parents with poor relations with children are encouraged to participate in relevant professional counseling programs to provide change and support. Finally, schools should alter students’ irrational beliefs by strengthening the support system and rational emotional behavioral interventions to reduce maladaptation.

This study still has some limitations. First, it does not provide insights into causal relationships between variables since it uses cross-sectional data. Second, data were collected from self-reports of students. Further studies with improved experimental design are needed to increase the accuracy of results. Third, this study did not distinguish the parenting modes of father and mother and their effects on maladaptation, suggesting the need for further studies.

Conclusions

A few major conclusions of the study are as follows:

  1. (1)

    Parenting mode can influence adaptability of university students.

  2. (2)

    Emotionally warm parenting mode strengthens the adaptability of university students. By contrast, negative parenting modes such as overprotection and rejection inculcate irrational beliefs, resulting in maladaptation of university students.

Availability of data and materials

Data may be subject to third-party rights and restrictions. The data sets used and/or analyzed in the present study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Vandenbos GR. APA dictionary of psychology. 2nd ed. Washington: American Psychological Association; 2015.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. Yoo YS. The effects of individuality and relationship of university freshman on college life adaptation. J Korea Entertain Ind Assoc. 2019;13(4):271–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Fei WJ, Gen YR, Wang SS, Ma QH, Peng XQ, Zhang M, et al. Association between parental control and subclinical depressive symptoms in a sample of college freshmen: roles of empathy and gender. J Affect Disorders. 2021;286:301–8.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Chen F. A survey on adaptability of freshmen in general undergraduate colleges: a study based on the case of Fuqing branch of Fujian Normal University and its countermeasures. J Fuqing Branch Fujian Norm Univ. 2013;3:47–52.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Li XY, Wang YZ, Wang WX. Research on the adjustment of freshman and its influence factors. China J Health Psychol. 2009;17:1354–6.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Lu SZ, Cheng SH. Research initially into the adaptable problems of freshmen. J Hubei Univ. 2004;31:230–3.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Watson JC. Native American racial identity development and college adjustment at two year institutions. J Coll Couns. 2009;12:125–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bi CH, Yao YH, Chen ZT. Relation between personality, family interpersonal dynamics and students’adaption to college. Chin Ment Health J. 2015;4:316–20.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Zhu LY, Li J. An empirical study on college freshmens’adaptation and its influence factors. J Northeast Univ. 2015;17:416–21.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Credé M, Niehorster S. Adjustment to college as measured by the student adaptation to college questionnaire: a quantitative review of its structure and relationships with correlates and consequences. Educ Psychol Rev. 2012;24:133–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Mandleco BL, Peery JC. An organizational framework for conceptualizing resilience in children. J Child Adol Ps Nurs. 2000;13:99–111.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Belsky J, Steinberg L, Draper P. Childhood experience, interpersonal development, and reproductive strategy: an evolutionary theory of socialization. Child Dev. 1991;62:647–70.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Darling N, Steinberg L. Parenting style as context: an integrative model. Psychol Bull. 1993;113:487–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Zakeri H, Esfahani BN, Razmjoee M. Parenting styles and academic procrastination. Procedia Soc Behav Sci. 2013;84:57–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Arrindell WA, Sanavio E, Aguilar G, Sica C, Ende J. The development of a short form of the EMBU: its appraisal with students in Greece, Guatemala, Hungary and Italy. Pers Indiv Differ. 1999;27:613–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Li J, Willems YE, Stok FM, Dekovic M, Bartels M, Finkenauer C. Parenting and self-control across early to late adolescence: a three-level meta-analysis. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2019;14:967–1005.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Ng-Knight T, Shelton KH, Riglin L, Mcmanus IC, Frederickson N, Rice F. A longitudinal study of self-control at the transition to secondary school: considering the role of pubertal status and parenting. J Adolescence. 2016;50:44–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Wang LX, Zhang LY, Chang SM,Ninth-Graders. Families’Socioeconomic status and their learning engagement: the multiple mediating effects of parental expectations for education and parenting styles,Chinese Journal of Special Education ( Monthly) 12th Issue, 2018, Serial No. 222.

  19. Baardstu S, Karevold EB, Soest TV. Childhood antecedents of agreeableness: a longitudinal study from preschool to late adolescence. J Res Pers. 2016;67:202–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Li DP, Zhang W, Li LD, Wang YH, Zhen SJ. The effects of parenting styles and temperament on adolescent aggression: examining unique, differential, and mediation effects. Acta Psychol Sinica. 2012;44:211–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Chen Q, Shum KKM. Relations between caregivers’ emotion regulation strategies, parenting styles, and preschoolers’ emotional competence in Chinese parenting and grandparenting. Early Child Res Q. 2022;59:121–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Marcone R, Affuso G, Borrone A. Parenting styles and children's internalizing-externalizing behavior: the mediating role of behavioral regulation. Curr Psychol. 2017;39:13–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Klein EM, Elmar B, Katja P, Tibubos AN, Mareike E, Jrg W, et al. The association between recalled parental rearing behavior and depressiveness: a comparison between 1st immigrants and non-immigrants in the population-based Gutenberg health study. BMC Psychiatry. 2020;20(1):367.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Balan R, Dobrean A, Roman GD, Balazsi R. Indirect effects of parenting practices on internalizing problems among adolescents: the role of expressive suppression. J Child Fam Stud. 2017;26:40–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Yap MBH, Jorm AF. Parental factors associated with childhood anxiety, depression, and internalizing problems: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Affect Disorders. 2015;175:424–40.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Nishikawa S, Sundbom E, Hägglӧf B. Influence of perceived parental rearing on adolescent self-concept and internalizing and externalizing problems in Japan. J Child Fam Stud. 2010;19:57–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Chao RK. Beyond parental control and authoritarian parenting style: understanding Chinese parenting through the cultural notion of training. Child Dev. 1994;65:1111–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Chao RK. Extending research on the consequences of parenting style for Chinese Americans and European Americans. Child Dev. 2001;72:1832–43.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. David D, Schnur J, Belloiu A. Another search for the "hot" cognitions: appraisal, irrational beliefs, attributions, and their relation to emotion. J Ration-Emot Cogn-B. 2002;20:93–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Bayram N, Bilgel N. The prevalence and socio-demographic correlations of depression, anxiety and stress among a group of university students. Soc Psych Psych Epid. 2008;43:667–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Baumrind D. Current patterns of parental authority. Dev Psychol. 1971;4(1, Pt.2):1–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Maccoby EE, Martin JA. Socialization in the context of the family: parent-child interaction. In: Mussen IPH, editor. Handbook of child psychology, vol. 4. New York: Wiley; 1983. p. 1–101.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Martinez I, Garcia F, Veiga F, Garcia OF, Rodrigues Y, Serra E. Parenting styles, internalization of values and self-esteem: a cross-cultural study in Spain, Portugal and Brazil. Int J Env Res Pub He. 2020;17(2370):1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Garcia OF, Fuentes MC, Gracia E, Serra E, Garcia F. Parenting warmth and strictness across three generations: parenting styles and psychosocial adjustment. Int J Env Res Pub He. 2020;17(7487):1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Martinez I, Murgui S, Garcia OF, Garcia F. Parenting and adolescent adjustment: the mediational role of family self-esteem. J Child Fam Stud. 2021;30:1184–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Leung JTY, Shek DTL. Family functioning, filial piety and adolescent psycho-social competence in Chinese single-mother families experiencing economic disadvantage: implications for social work. Brit J Soc Work. 2015;46:1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Sonego M, Llácer A, Galán I, Simón F. The influence of parental education on child mental health in Spain. Qual Life Res. 2013;22:203–11.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Jiang J. Revision of the short-form egna minnen av barndoms uppfostran for Chinese. Psychol Dev Educ. 2010;26:94–9.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Wang Y. Prediction of college students' irrational beliefs on their post-earthquake stress response. Sichuan: Sichuan Normal University; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Baker RW, Siryk B. Measuring adjustment to college. J Couns Psychol. 1984;31:179–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Baker RW. Student adaptation to college questionnaire (SACQ): manual. Los Angeles: Western Psychological Services; 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Selig JP, Preacher KJ. Mediation models for longitudinal data in developmental research. Res Hum Dev. 2009;6:144–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Hair JF, Black WC, Babin BJ, Anderson RE. Multivariate data analysis: a global perspective[M]. Upper Sadder River: Prentice-Hall; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Martinez-Escudero JA, Villarejo S, Garcia OF, Garcia F. Parental socialization and its impact across the lifespan. Behav Sci. 2020;10(101):1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Queiroz P, Garcia OF, Garcia F, Zacares JJ, Camino C. Self and nature: parental socialization, self-esteem, and environmental values in Spanish adolescents. Int J Env Res Pub He. 2020;17(3732):1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Miranda MC, Affuso G, Esposito C, Bacchini D. Parental acceptance-rejection and adolescent maladjustment: mothers’ and fathers’ combined roles. J Child Fam Stud. 2016;25(4):1352–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Higgins ET, Silberman I. Development of regulatory focus: promotion and prevention as ways of living. In: Heckhausen J, Dweck CS, editors. Motivation and self-regulation across the life span. New York: Cambridge University Press; 1998. p. 78–113.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  48. Bronfenbrenner U. The ecology of human development: experiments by nature and design. Cambridge: Harvard University Press; 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Barnes J, Katz I, Korbin J, O'Brien M. Children and families in communities: theory, research, policy and practice. Hoboken: Wiley. 2006.

  50. Parents T. The social structure of the family; 2022. p. 173–201.

  51. Gimenez-Serrano S, Alcaide M, Reyes M, Zacarés JJ, Celdrán M. Beyond parenting socialization years: the relationship between parenting dimensions and grandparenting functioning. Int J Env Res Pub He. 2022;19(4528):1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Crusec JE, Lytton H. Socialization and family, in social development: history, theory, and research. New York: Springer; 1988. p. 161–212.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Arnett PA, Randolph JJ. Longitudinal course of depression symptoms in multiple sclerosis. J Neurol Neurosur Ps. 2006;77:606–10.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Erikson EH. Childhood and society. New York: Norton; 1950.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Maxwell A, Reay RE, Huber A, Hawkins E, Woolnough E, Mcmahon C. Parent and practitioner perspectives on circle of security parenting (COS-P): a qualitative study. Infant Ment Health J. 2021;42:452–68.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Ross CE, Mirowsky J. Sex differences in the effect of education on depression: resource multiplication or resource substitution? Soc Sci Med. 2006;63:1400–13.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Bandura A. Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. Am Psychol. 1982;37:122–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Bandura A. Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychol Rev. 1977;2:191–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Lin N. Social support, life events and depression: Academic Press; 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Cobb S. Social support as moderator of life stress. Psychosom Med. 1976;38:300–14.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Cheng ZJ. Peer assistance: a new way to transform the paradigm of school education. Explor Higher Edu. 2015;3:27–30.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Krakau L, Tibubos AN, Beutel ME, Ehrenthal JC, Gieler U, Brähler E. Personality functioning as a mediator of adult mental health following child maltreatment. J Affect Disorders. 2021;291:126–34.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Wei R, Liu D. Research on children's attachment and family rearing style from the perspective of intellectualization. J China Youth Univ Politics. 2014;33:29–32.

    Google Scholar 

  64. Ding G, Xu LZ, Sun L. Association between parental parenting style disparities and mental health: an evidence from Chinese medical college students. Front Public Health. 2022;10:841140.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Ramsewak S, Moty N, Putteeraj M, Somanah J, Nirmala LP. Parenting style and its effect on eating disorders and substance abuse across the young population. Discov Psychol. 2022;2. https://doi.org/10.1007/S44202-022-00025-7.

  66. Faramarz A, Aghaei K, Fazaeli T, Vaezi A, Szczygieł M. A structural equation modeling of the relationships between parenting styles, students’ personality traits, and students’ achievement goal orientation. Front Psychol. 2022;12:805308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Ellis A. Rational emotive behavior therapy today. Newyork: Lyle Stuart; 1999.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We sincerely thank the great contributions of the study participants and the staffs who assisted with data collection in this research. Also, we are grateful to the adolescents’ teachers and parents for their supports.

Funding

The design of the study and the collection of data are supported by the Guangdong Provincial first-class undergraduate specialty construction project (JGTH[2019]No.46). The analysis and interpretation of data, as well as publication of the paper are supported by the 2020 new agricultural science research and reform practice project of the Ministry of Education (JGTH[2020]No.20) and the Scientific research fund project of Yunnan Provincial Department of Education (2022j0972).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

KH made substantive intellectual contributions to the design of the study, collection, analysis and interpretation of data and drafting the manuscript. XHW was involved in design of the study, analysis and interpretation of data. DYJ and WXF made outstanding contributions to the collection of data. ZW provided help to the design of the study, the interpretation of data, draft and revision of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhang Wei.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was conducted according to the Declaration of Helsinki and relevant policies in China. The study protocol was approved by the ethics committee of Guangdong Ocean University. The written form approval from relevant officials was obtained. The written informed consent had been obtained from the parents or guardians on behalf of the adolescents to participate in the research. Before administering any study-related questionnaires, all participants also signed an informed consent form.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that there are no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hua, K., Hongwang, X., Yujian, D. et al. Effects of parenting mode on student adaptability: the mediating effect of irrational beliefs. BMC Psychiatry 22, 592 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-022-04222-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-022-04222-5

Keywords

  • Students’ adaptation
  • Emerging adulthood
  • Parenting mode
  • Mediating effect
  • Irrational beliefs