Skip to main content

The feasibility of using life skills training in primary schools to improve mental health and academic performance: a pilot study in Kenya

Abstract

Background

There is no Kenyan evidence on the relationship between mental illness and academic performance. We aimed to determine the effect of life skills training on mental health and academic performance.

Methods

We administered to 1848 primary school children a researcher designed socio-demographic questionnaire, and the Youth Self Report (YSR) and Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) to their parents, followed by eight sessions of life skills training. We extracted data from the individual records of each child on overall performance pre and post training separated by one year. We conducted descriptive statistics, paired sample t-tests, multivariate linear regression analysis and linear mixed model analysis to assess changing patterns of academic performance and any predictive characteristics.

Results

There was significant (p < 0.05) improvement in overall academic performance (aggregate marks and all individual subjects) for both lower primary and upper primary classes after the life-skills training intervention. For lower classes (2-4 grades) increase in academic performance was significantly associated with fathers and mothers education levels, region and class. For upper classes, (5-7 grades) increase in academic performance was associated with region, class and age.

Conclusions

Life skills training is recommended as it could improve academic performance, but predicted by socio-demographic factors.

Peer Review reports

Highlights

  • School children.

  • Mental health.

  • Life skills training.

  • Academic performance.

Introduction

Evidence, mainly in high income countries (HICs) demonstrates a relationship between children’s mental disorders and poor academic performance: poor concentration [1, 2]; depression, conduct disorders, substance use [1]; and anxiety or school phobia [3] and suicidality [4]. The greater the number of conditions, the poorer the academic performance [5, 6]. Mental disorders are also associated with increased school drop-out [7,8,9], and truancy [10] due to psychosocial dysfunction [11] and perception of poor academic performance leading to low self-esteem. [12]. A Dutch study found that the negative effect of externalizing problems on academic achievement was not attributable to the Intelligent Quotient (IQ) of the children i.e. not to their intellectual potential but to other factors [13]. There is a dearth of literature on comparable studies in LMIC, creating a gap in our understanding on how HIC and LMIC compare and contrast. This study seeks to contribute towards addressing this gap. The finding from the Dutch study that factors other than 1Q alone contribute to externalizing problems calls for context appropriate determination of other possible contributors to externalizing behavior, not only in a HIC but also in LMIC.

School based approach to mental health can improve academic performance [14, 15]. It can also increase the chance of the students remaining in school [16]. Mental health disorders are highly prevalent ranging from 12 to 37% depending on the type of condition in school going children in Africa, for example South Africa [17] and Kenya [18,19,20,21]. These prevalence rates are similar to that found in HICs such as the USA [22]. These comparable rates in prevalence of mental disorders in youth in both HIC and LMIC is further justification to study how mental disorders are related to academic performance in LMIC as compared to HIC. A further justification is the importance of intervention as early as possible. Preliminary data shows that life skills training reduces the level of symptoms on Youth Self-Report (YSR) scores in primary school children in Kenya [23]. This study aims to test the feasibility of applying life skills training for schools in a Kenyan setting with the view to treat mental disorders and enhance academic performance. This information can inform policy and practice on school mental health in Kenya and other similar settings.

Methods

Study design

This was a one group pre-post intervention study design implemented as a program.

Study Site

This study was part of a bigger study titled The Kenya Integrated Intervention Model for Dialogue and Screening to Promote Children’s Mental Wellbeing (KIDS). The study had identified Makueni and Machakos counties in South East Kenya. Makueni is predominantly rural whereas Machakos has large peri-urban population. In Makueni County, we randomly picked Makindu sub-county, one of the 6 sub-counties in Makueni County and in Machakos County we randomly picked Machakos sub-county. For the purpose of this study, Machakos sub-county is referred to as peri-urban study site whereas Makindu sub-county is referred to as rural study site. These two counties were chosen for KIDS because Africa Mental Health Research and Training Foundation (AMHRTF) had been undertaking community mental health implementation research at the invitation of the local County Governments. School mental health had not been part of this community mental health. In order to facilitate effective supervision of schools by the school supervisors, the schools in each of sub-county are divided into several groups; each group being referred to by MoE as a cluster. We randomly chose six clusters per sub-county and then randomly selected two schools per cluster to meet our predetermined sample. We sampled a total of 23 schools, 11 from Machakos sub-county and 12 from Makindu sub-county.

Study Participants

Participants were primary school children and their parents in the participating lower primary (classes 2-4 aged 7 - 10 years) and upper primary (classes 5-7 aged 11 - 13 years) schools. The required school entry age in Kenya is 6 years. Because we wanted to have both the end of year examination results for the previous year and the current end of year, we excluded performance analysis on first year (class 1) who did not have any results and final year (class 8) because of preparation for the National Examinations which are different from those end of year examinations that are administered by the schools.

Measures

The Socio-Demographic Questionnaire

We used a researcher-designed socio-demographic questionnaire, completed by the children on themselves and also on their parents to include age, gender, region (rural or peri-urban) and class for the pupils, and parents marital status, employment status and education level.

Mental Health Assessment

The Youth Self-Report (YSR) has good psychometric properties [24] and has been used across different and multicultural societies [25] by children aged 11-18 years. It is a self-report on mental disorders. The Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) is administered to parents or caretakers to report mental health problems among children 6 to 18 years [26]. Both YSR and CBCL focus on the previous 2 weeks at the time of administration. [24, 26] have broken down the syndromes of CBCL and YSR, the summary scores and how to interpret the scores as follows; (i) The syndromes - Anxious/Depressed, Withdrawn/Depressed, Somatic Complaints, Social Problems, Thought Problems, Attention Problems, Rule-Breaking Behavior and Aggressive Behavior. (ii) The summary scores - Internalizing Problems (summarizing the Anxious/Depressed, Withdrawn/Depressed, and Somatic Complaints scores), Externalizing Problems (summarizing the Rule-Breaking Behavior and Aggressive Behavior scores) and Total Problems score (summarizing all 8 syndrome scale scores) and (iii) the interpretation of the scores - Each scale score is interpreted based on the T score whereby T score of (below 65) is considered to be in the normal range, (65 to 69) is considered to be in the borderline range and (70 and above) is considered to be in the clinical range.

Academic Performance

The Kenya Institute of Curriculum Development provides guidelines on subjects to be examined and how to grade them [27]. The subjects examined in the primary schools were as follows: Mathematics, English, Kiswahili, Science and Social Studies where each subject is worth a maximum of 100 marks and yielding a maximum aggregate of 500 marks for all subjects. The grading system was based on an expanded 12- letter grade ranging from A (highest) to F (Lowest). The subject letter grades and their corresponding scores were A (80-100), A-(75-79.99), B+(70-74.99), B(65-69.99), B-(60-64.99), C+(55-59.99), C(50-54.99), C-(45-49.99), D+(40-44.99), D(35-39.99), D-(30-34.99) and F(0-29.99). Alternatively, the aggregate letter grades and their corresponding marks were A(400-500), A-(375-399), B+(350-374), B(325-349), B-(300-324), C+(275-299), C(250-274), C-(225-249), D+(200-224), D(175-199), D-(150-174) and F(0-149). Cumulative end of year scores were collected for each student for the individual subject and an aggregate for all subjects. The baseline was the end of year scores before the intervention and the post-intervention score was on end of year scores in the following year. We extracted these scores from the school transcripts that normally provide this information. This extraction was part of the data collection and done at around the same time we were administering the other instruments.

The Ministry of Education (MoE) Life Skills Training Curriculum

The intervention took place early in the second term (May and June). The intervention focused on life skills training, using the standard life-skills training curriculum developed by MoE [28] with the help of expert consultants provided by World Health Organization (WHO) and United Nations International Children’s Emergency Fund (UNICEF) to the MoE Department of Curriculum Development. The joint MoE/UNICEF expert committee adapted the WHO life skills program [29] to the Kenyan socio-cultural context. The adapted curriculum had two versions; one for lower primary school (standard1-4) and one for upper primary school (standard 5-8). It was then piloted and adopted as the official standard life skills curriculum for all schools. It was designed to fit into the eight hours that are allowed for extra-curriculum activities, as part of all other curriculums by the MoE. The training was spread out with flexibility to suit the convenience of individual schools. We negotiated with each school and class the best time to train their children for the eight hours spread equally over four weeks. Thus, this curriculum has an inbuilt time line (a total of 8 h spread out to suit the convenience of each school) and has well-structured curriculum content covered in a systematic manner. Thematic lines of the adapted curriculum included: critical/creative thinking, effective communication, empathy, decision making, stress management and internal locus of control. Each student has their own booklet on items to be covered and a check out for completed skills. This approach ensured that every student in this study completed the 8 h, using a confirmed content for all students and same level of quality of fidelity of the training. This project facilitated every child in the study sites to have their own copy of the booklet so as to follow using their own copy what they were being trained by our consultant specifically hired for this project.

Study Procedures

We used consultant trainers. These trainers were professional teachers who had taken further training on life-skills and are used to train teachers, but we also used them to conduct life-skills training for the children. We sought consent from the parents during one of the parent-teacher meetings. We explained the nature of the study, the potential benefits of improving the mental health of the children and the academic performance in the children that there were no risks involved and that it was voluntary. We explained that we will conduct the interventions early in the second term (May and June) and that we will avoid the third term, which starts in September, because of the schools’ preparations for end of year examinations. All the parents consented and signed for their respective children. This was repeated for the children in the classroom situation.

Statistical analysis

We used descriptive statistics to determine socio-demographic characteristics (as summarized in Table 1) of the sample as well as CBCL and YSR syndrome scales; paired sample t-tests to assess the differences before and after intervention on the aggregate academic performance scores as well as the individual subject’s scores; linear mixed model to determine predictors of academic performance controlling for socio demographic characteristics on improvement and mental disorders. All the analyses were done using STATA version 14.

Results

Table 1 summarizes the socio-demographics of the children and their parents divided by lower and upper primary children, including the CBCL/YSR syndrome mean scores at pre- and post-intervention and the follow up completion rates (85-95%) for each variable. Only a small number of the participants were lost to follow-up while the majority were in the study from pretest to posttest as seen from the follow-up rates. The mean scores for attention, internalizing, externalizing and total scores were comparable for both lower and upper classes in pre and posttest. Fathers education level, Mothers education level, region and class are significantly associated with increase in academic performance in lower class while region, class and age are significantly associated with increase in academic performance in upper class.

Table 1 Demographic Characteristics of Participants and follow-up Rates

Table 2 summarizes comparison of mean pretest and posttest academic performance scores aggregate marks and per subject disaggregated by region for both primary and upper primary classes. There was significant improvement in all aggregate scores and in nearly all individual subjects, highlighted in bold. The only non-significant (p > 0.05) findings were on Science (rural lower classes and peri-urban upper classes), social studies (peri-urban upper classes) and Mathematics and Kiswahili - the national lingua franca (rural upper classes). There was significant change in all CBCL syndrome scores. The only non-significant change in YSR syndrome scores in were Attention and Externalizing (peri-urban).

Table 2 Academic performance and CBCL/YSR syndrome scores before and after intervention overall and by region

Table 3 summarizes the independent predictors of academic performance after the life-skills training intervention. All significant independent predictors of aggregate and individual subject scores in lower classes and upper classes are highlighted in bold.

Table 3 Independent Predictors of Academic performance in (Lower classes 2-4) and (Upper classes 5-7) after Interventiona

Table 4 summarizes the trends and significant change in academic performance after the life-skills training intervention adjusting for all the socio-demographics and CBCL indicators in the lower primary classes and YSR indicators in the upper primary classes. In almost all the scores (aggregate and individual subjects) in lower classes and upper classes, after controlling for other factors, the effect of time was significant in which there was increase in academic performance after intervention, highlighted in bold.

Table 4 Linear Mixed Model Assessing Predictors of Academic performance in (Lower classes 2-4) and (Upper classes 5-7) after Interventiona

As shown in Table 5 on correlations, there was positive association between improvement in aggregate scores; English and science scores with improvement in internalizing, externalizing and total problems. However, there was no association between academic improvement and attention problems. The same was also replicated when regressing academic performance and individual syndromes controlling for gender, guardianship, marital status, father education level, mother education level, father employment, mother employment, region, class and age. However, when all the syndromes were added to the regression model (Model 5), there was loss of this association except for attention problem on aggregate scores (< 0.05).

Table 5 Correlation between Academic Improvement and Symptom Reduction on Specific Problems and specific symptom reduction associated with improvement in Academic performance

Discussion

This is the first study in Kenya showing improvements in aggregate educational scores, English and science scores on internalizing, externalizing and total problems. It is also the first to demonstrate the impact of life-skills training, on mental health and academic performance in a Kenyan setting. An incidental positive finding of this study is that in Kenya, girls and boys are receiving equal access to education in both rural and urban areas (Table 1). We attribute this equity to the compulsory education for all children in Kenya.

There are some common findings with our and HIC studies. Firstly, attention problems were associated with least improvements even on interventions as has been found elsewhere [1, 9, 30, 31]. This is not surprising given that attention problems, regardless of whether they occur in LMICs or HICs, are associated with cognitive dysfunctions and organic brain syndromes [32, 33] and therefore less amenable to life skills training than other syndromes. This study population was drawn from LMIC where it is expected there are higher levels of malnutrition and in particular an average of 42% in Makueni County of stunted growth related to malnutrition which can be expected to result in and brain insults[34]. Another agreement with findings from HICs is that mental health syndromes that are amenable to interventions were associated with best academic outcomes confirming that mental disorders are associated with academic performance [4, 35,36,37]. Our findings further agree with findings from HICs that early treatment of mental disorders in children may improve academic performance [11, 38]. The urgency for intervention in LMICs is the same as in HICs given similar epidemiological patterns and prevalence of various mental disorders as pointed out under the Introduction. School forums allow for reach to critical numbers at much younger age, make maximal use of the resources that are available and afford more children the opportunity to manipulate and improve their trajectories in later life. We have demonstrated the feasibility of this [23, 39]. The fact that we used 2 different cohorts – rural and urban and demonstrated similar trends on outcomes on different syndromes points to the success of the interventions. We speculate that parental education (father and mother) was associated with better academic performance at lower classes (and therefore lower ages) because at lower age the children most important environment are the parents while at higher classes the physical environment becomes more noticeable by the children.

These feasibility findings have a particular relevance to a LMIC where there is a dearth of mental health expertise. The fact that these skills can be administered by teachers already operational within the existing system has implications for sustainability of the intervention using already existing resources. This is a good example of the task shifting model where complicated intervention best administered by highly qualified experts can be administered by teachers who have been trained on the administration of the skills

Strengths

There were high follow up rates (83.2 – 95.4%) which we attribute to minimal change of schools in the course of the study, also a reflection of the students’ interest in participation in the study and the support of the parents and the teachers for this study.

Limitation

The interpretations of our findings are limited in several ways. We have no prior data from Africa to compare with. Secondly, the outcomes between lower primary and upper primary classes are limited for purposes of comparison because the measures are different and by different participants in each year group. CBCL for lower primary relied on parent’s perception of problems and YSR for upper children was by the children themselves on how they perceived their own problems. Many studies from across the globe indicate disagreement between parents rating their children using CBCL and children rating themselves using YSR [40,41,42,43,44,45]. Other studies suggest some agreements on CBCL by parents and YSR [46, 47]. However, this is only applicable if there is the same cohort of parents and same cohort of students both focusing on the students at more or less the same time. Furthermore, the adapted versions for the life skills are different for lower primary and upper primary classes as they were designed to be age appropriate.

We employed a single group pretest and posttest design without a control group or waitlisted group for comparison. However, this limitation is mainly logistical to separate children in the same class to one group receiving an intervention and another one not receiving intervention – can have negative impacts – those receiving intervention being viewed as the ones with mental illness by those not receiving intervention. We used a subsample of Kenya, so our results are not necessarily representative of all Kenyan students. The socio-demographics of the guardians/ parents were given by the children. This most likely explains the high levels of missing information (7.8 – 12.8%) in both rural and peri-urban schools since the children may not be in the know of all socio-demographics of their parents.

Conclusions

Our study is an additional demonstration of the feasibility of life-skills training, in this case with the focus on academic improvement, probably mediated by improvements in mental health. We advocate for further mixed methods studies that will take into account these preliminary findings, to determine more precisely the design and then deliver randomized clinical trials to test school based interventions for mental health for impact on childhood mental health and academic performance.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Breslau J, Lane M, Sampson N, Kessler RC. Mental disorders and subsequent educational attainment in a US national sample. J Psychiatr Res. 2008;42(9):708–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Humensky J, Kuwabara SA, Fogel J, Wells C, Goodwin B, Voorhees BW Van. Adolescents with depressive symptoms and their challenges with learning in school. J Sch Nurs. 2010;26(5):377–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Kessler RC. The impairments caused by social phobia in the general population: implications for intervention. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2003;108:19–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Kantomaa MT, Tammelin TH, Demakakos P, Ebeling HE, Taanila AM. Physical activity, emotional and behavioural problems, maternal education and self-reported educational performance of adolescents. Health Educ Res. 2010;25(2):368–79.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Eisenberg D, Golberstein E, Hunt JB. Mental health and academic success in college. BE J Econ Anal Policy. 2009;9(1):1–40.

  6. McLeod JD, Uemura R, Rohrman S. Adolescent mental health, behavior problems, and academic achievement. J Health Soc Behav. 2012;53(4):482–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Provasnik S, Planty M. Community Colleges: Special Supplement to The Condition of Education 2008 (NCES 2008-033). [Internet]. National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. Washington, DC; 2008. Available from: https://nces.ed.gov/pubs2008/2008033.pdf.

  8. Ashby CM, Bascetta CA. YOUNG ADULTS WITH SERIOUS MENTAL ILLNESS: Some States and Federal Agencies Are Taking Steps to Address Their Transition Challenges. GAO Reports. 2008;1–81. Available from: https://www.gao.gov/assets/gao-08-678.pdf.

  9. Breslau J, Miller E, Breslau N, Bohnert K, Lucia V, Schweitzer J. The impact of early behavior disturbances on academic achievement in high school. Pediatrics. 2009;123(6):1472–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Stein MB, Kean YM. Disability and quality of life in social phobia: epidemiologic findings. Am J Psychiatry. 2000;157(10):1606–13.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Gall G, Pagano ME, Desmond MS, Perrin JM, Murphy JM. Utility of psychosocial screening at a school-based health center. J Sch Health. 2000;70(7):292–8.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Martin G, Richardson AS, Bergen HA, Roeger L, Allison S. Perceived academic performance, self-esteem and locus of control as indicators of need for assessment of adolescent suicide risk: implications for teachers. J Adolesc. 2005;28(1):75–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Masten AS, Roisman GI, Long JD, Burt KB, Obradović J, Riley JR, et al. Developmental cascades: linking academic achievement and externalizing and internalizing symptoms over 20 years. Dev Psychol. 2005;41(5):733.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Payton J, Weissberg RP, Durlak JA, Dymnicki AB, Taylor RD, Schellinger KB, et al. The Positive Impact of Social and Emotional Learning for Kindergarten to Eighth-Grade Students: Findings from Three Scientific Reviews [Internet]. Chicago: Collaborative for Academic, Social, and Emotional Learning (CASEL); 2008. Available from: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED505370.pdf.

  15. Walker SC, Kerns SEU, Lyon AR, Bruns EJ, Cosgrove TJ. Impact of school-based health center use on academic outcomes. J Adolesc Heal. 2010;46(3):251–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Brown MB, Bolen LM. The school-based health center as a resource for prevention and health promotion. Psychol Sch. 2008;45(1):28–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Cortina MA, Fazel M, Hlungwani TM, Kahn K, Tollman S, Cortina-Borja M, et al. Childhood psychological problems in school settings in rural Southern Africa. PLoS One. 2013;8(6):e65041.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Magai DN, Malik JA, Koot HM. Emotional and Behavioral Problems in Children and Adolescents in Central Kenya. Child Psychiatry Hum Dev. 2018 Aug;49(4):659–671.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Aillon J-L, Ndetei DM, Khasakhala L, Ngari WN, Achola HO, Akinyi S, et al. Prevalence, types and comorbidity of mental disorders in a Kenyan primary health centre. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2014 Aug;49(8):1257–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Ndetei DM, Ongecha FA, Khasakhala L, Syanda J, Mutiso V, Othieno CJ, et al. Bullying in public secondary schools in Nairobi, Kenya. J Child Adolesc Ment Health. 2007;19(1):45–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Khasakhala LI, Ndetei DM, Mutiso V, Mbwayo AW, Mathai M. The prevalence of depressive symptoms among adolescents in Nairobi public secondary schools: association with perceived maladaptive parental behaviour. Afr J Psychiatry. 2012 Mar;15(2):106–13.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Merikangas KR, He J, Burstein M, Swanson SA, Avenevoli S, Cui L, et al. Lifetime prevalence of mental disorders in US adolescents: results from the National Comorbidity Survey Replication–Adolescent Supplement (NCS-A). J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2010;49(10):980–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Ndetei DM, Mutiso V, Gitonga I, Agudile E, Tele A, Birech L, et al. World Health Organization life-skills training is efficacious in reducing youth self-report scores in primary school going children in Kenya. Early Interv Psychiatry. 2019 Oct;13(5):1146–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Achenbach TM, Dumenci L, Rescorla LA. DSM-oriented and empirically based approaches to constructing scales from the same item pools. J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2003 Sep;32(3):328–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Piper B, Gray H, Raber J, Birkett M. Reliability and Validity of the Brief Problem Monitor: An Abbreviated Form of the Child Behavior Checklist (P1. 099). Neurology. 2015;84(14 Supplement):P1-099.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Achenbach T, Rescorla L. “Manual for the ASEBA school-age forms & profiles: an integrated system of multi-informant assessment.” Burlington: University of Vermont; 2001.

  27. Kenya Institute of Curriculum Development. Basic Education Curriculum Framework. Kenya Institute of Curriculum Development. 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Kenya Insititute of Education. Life skills education for behaviour change. Facilitator’s handbook. 2002.

  29. WHO. Life skills education for children and adolescents in schools: Introduction and guidelines to facilitate the development and implementation of life skills programmes. Geneva, Switzerland: The Institute. 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Nelson JR, Benner GJ, Lane K, Smith BW. Academic achievement of K-12 students with emotional and behavioral disorders. Except Child. 2004;71(1):59–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Aguayo VM, Nair R, Badgaiyan N, Krishna V. Determinants of stunting and poor linear growth in children under 2 years of age in India: an in-depth analysis of Maharashtra’s comprehensive nutrition survey. Matern Child Nutr. 2016;12:121–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Ndetei DM, Mutiso V, Gitonga I, Agudile E, Tele A, Birech L, et al. World Health Organization life-skills training is efficacious in reducing youth self-report scores in primary school going children in Kenya. Early Interv Psychiatry. 2018;13(5):1146–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Achenbach TM, Ruffle TM. The Child Behavior Checklist and related forms for assessing behavioral/emotional problems and competencies. Pediatr Rev. 2000;21:265–71.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Macharia CW, Kogi-Makau W, Muroki NM. A comparative study on the nutritional status of children (6-59 months) in a World Vision Project area and a non-project area in Kathonzweni division, Makueni district, Kenya. African J Food, Agric Nutr Dev. 2005;5(1):1–13.

  35. DeSocio J, Hootman J. Children’s mental health and school success. J Sch Nurs. 2004;20(4):189–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Slap G, Goodman E, Huang B. Adoption as a risk factor for attempted suicide during adolescence. Pediatrics. 2001;108(2):e30–e30.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Blum RW, Beuhring T, Rinehart PM. Protecting Teens: Beyond Race, Income and Family Structure [Internet]. Minneapolis: Center for Adolescent Health, University of Minnesota; 2000. Available from: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED450075.pdf.

  38. Meinck F, Cluver LD, Orkin FM, Kuo C, Sharma AD, Hensels IS, et al. Pathways from family disadvantage via abusive parenting and caregiver mental health to adolescent health risks in South Africa. J Adolesc Heal. 2017;60(1):57–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Mutiso V, Tele A, Musyimi C, Gitonga I, Musau A, Ndetei D. Effectiveness of life skills education and psychoeducation on emotional and behavioral problems among adolescents in institutional care in Kenya: a longitudinal study. Child Adolesc Ment Health. 2018;23(4):351–8.

  40. Salbach-Andrae H, Klinkowski N, Lenz K, Lehmkuhl U. Agreement between youth-reported and parent-reported psychopathology in a referred sample. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2009;18(3):136–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Rescorla LA, Ewing G, Ivanova MY, Aebi M, Bilenberg N, Dieleman GC, et al. Parent–Adolescent Cross-Informant Agreement in Clinically Referred Samples: Findings From Seven Societies. J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2017;46(1):74–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Margari F, Craig F, Petruzzelli MG, Lamanna A, Matera E, Margari L. Parents psychopathology of children with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder. Res Dev Disabil. 2013;34(3):1036–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Vidair HB, Reyes JA, Shen S, Parrilla-Escobar MA, Heleniak CM, Hollin IL, et al. Screening parents during child evaluations: Exploring parent and child psychopathology in the same clinic. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2011;50(5):441–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Hemmingsson H, Ólafsdóttir LB, Egilson ST. Agreements and disagreements between children and their parents in health-related assessments. Disabil Rehabil. 2017 May;39(11):1059–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Vassi I, Veltsista A, Lagona E, Gika A, Kavadias G, Bakoula C. The generation gap in numbers: Parent-child disagreement on youth’s emotional and behavioral problems. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2008;43(12):1008–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Sourander A, Helstelä L, Helenius H. Parent-adolescent agreement on emotional and behavioral problems. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 1999;34(12):657–63.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Berg-Nielsen TS, Vika A, Dahl AA. When adolescents disagree with their mothers: CBCL‐YSR discrepancies related to maternal depression and adolescent self‐esteem. Child Care Health Dev. 2003;29(3):207–13.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to the Ministry of Education, National headquarters for authorizing and supporting this study and also the County Governments of Makueni and Machakos. We are also grateful to Ruth Ruhara, Darius Nyamai and Grace Mutevu of Africa Mental Health Research and Training Foundation (AMHRTF) for their valuable editorial inputs in the course of drafting the manuscript.

Guidelines

All the guidelines have been followed and adhered to as per the journal requirements.

Funding

This study was leveraged on another funded study but there was no funding for this particular study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

DMN - conceptualization and oversight of the study; drafting of the paper; VNM - oversight on data collection; drafting of the paper; CWM - Ethical conduct of the study and data management; RKA-data analysis; JRS-Critique on the manuscript ; KSB- Critique on the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David M. Ndetei.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was conducted in conformity with the World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki – ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. Ethical approval was granted by the Kenya Medical Research Institute (KEMRI) IRB Centre for Addiction and Mental Health Research Ethics Board, protocol reference number is #194/2013. Informed consent was obtained from parents of participants. Informed assent was obtained and signed for by the participants.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ndetei, D.M., Mutiso, V.N., Musyimi, C.W. et al. The feasibility of using life skills training in primary schools to improve mental health and academic performance: a pilot study in Kenya. BMC Psychiatry 22, 131 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-022-03781-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-022-03781-x

Keywords

  • Life skills training
  • Primary school children
  • Academic performance, Kenya